In our country, outcome measures are needed to evaluate the results of occupational therapy in amputees. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of a Turkish version of the RNLI. The Turkish version of the RNLI was applied to 120 amputees. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to determine internal consistency and test–retest reliability, respectively. Criterion validity was assessed using Short Form 36 (SF-36). The Turkish version of the RNLI presented reliable results in repeated assessments (ICC = .88), and the internal consistency of the RNLI was high (Cronbach’s α coefficient = .89). A statistically significant relationship was found between RNLI and SF-36 (p < .05). The Turkish RNLI is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the level of reintegration to normal living for amputees.
AkyurekG.BuminG.CroweT. K. (2020). The factors associated with community participation: Employment and education of people with disabilities in Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 27(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2019.1587502
2.
AlparR. (2006). Spor bilimlerinde uygulamalı istatistik [Applied Statistics in Sport Sciences]. Nobel Academic Publishing.
3.
AnderssonN.LexellJ.BrogardhC. (2020). Test-Retest Reliability of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL-I) to Assess Perceived Participation in Adults With Late Effects of Polio. Pm r, 12(2), 147–153. doi:10.1002/pmrj.12162
4.
AticR.AydinA. (2018). Comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics, functional status and quality of life of lower extremity amputees to identify the reason for undergoing amputation. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 31(5), 973–979. https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-181148
5.
Ayganİ.Tuncayİ.TosunN.VuralS. (1999). Amputations. Turkısh Journal of Arthroplasty and Arthroscopic Surgery, 10(2), 179–183.
6.
BayramlarK.ErgunN. (2009). Engelli Masa Tenisi Oyuncularında Yaşam Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesi [Assessment of Quality of Life in Disabled Table Tennis Players]. Turkiye Klinikleri/Journal of Sports Sciences, 1(1), 53–57.
7.
BeatonD. E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
BourgetN.Deblock-BellamyA.BlanchetteA. K.BatchoC. S. (2018). Use and psychometric properties of the reintegration to Normal Living Index in rehabilitation: A systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 61(4), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.0041
10.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
11.
DajprathamP.TantiniramaiS.LukkapichonchutP.KaewnareeS. (2008). Factors associated with vocational reintegration among the Thai lower limb amputees. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand/Chotmaihet thangphaet, 91(2), 234–239.
12.
DaneskiK.CoshallC.TillingandK.WolfeC. D. (2003). Reliability and validity of a postal version of the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, modified for use with stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17(8), 835–839. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215503cr686oa
13.
DavisA. M.DevlinM.GriffinA. M.WunderJ. S.BellR. S. (1999). Functional outcome in amputation versus limb sparing of patients with lower extremity sarcoma: A matched case-control study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80(6), 615–618. https://doi.org/0.1016/s0003-9993(99)90161-2
14.
DoganA.SungurI.BilgicS.UsluM.AtikB.TanO.. . .AkpinarF. (2008). Amputations in eastern Turkey (Van): A multicenter epidemiological study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 42(1), 53–58.
15.
EbelR. L. (1951). Estimation of the reliability of ratings. Psychometrika, 16(4), 407–424.
16.
FernandezA.IsusiI.GomezM. (2000). Factors conditioning the return to work of upper limb amputees in Asturias, Spain. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 24(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640008726537
17.
GretschelD.VisagieS.InglisG. (2017). Community integration of adults with disabilities post discharge from an in-patient rehabilitation unit in the Western Cape. South African Journal of Physiotherapy, 73(1), Article 361. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v73i1.361
18.
GuchanZ.BayramlarK.ErgunN. (2017). Determination of the effects of playing soccer on physical fitness in individuals with transtibial amputation. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 57(6), 879–886. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06336-2
19.
HitzigS. L.EscobarE. M. R.NoreauL.CravenB. C. (2012). Validation of the reintegration to Normal Living Index for community-dwelling persons with chronic spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(1), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.200
20.
KarakoçA. G. D. F. Y.DönmezL. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler [Basic Principles of Scale Development]. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 13(40), 39–49.
21.
KocyigitH. (1999). Kisa Form-36 (KF-36)’nm Turkce versiyonunun guvenilirligi ve gecerliligi [The Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Short Form-36 (SF-36)]. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi, 12, 102–106.
22.
KohlerF.CiezaA.StuckiG.GeertzenJ.BurgerH.DillonM. P.. . .KostanjsekN. (2009). Developing Core Sets for persons following amputation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 33(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640802652029
23.
LiuY.-W.MaK. W. (2017). The psychometric properties of the Chinese version—Reintegration to Normal Living Index (C-RNLI) for identifying participation restriction among community-dwelling frail older people. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0424-5
24.
LusardiM. M.JorgeM.NielsenC. C. (2013). Orthotics and prosthetics in rehabilitation (e-book). Elsevier.
25.
MerzZ. C.Van PattenR.MulhauserK.FucetolaR. (2017). Exploratory factor analysis of the reintegration to Normal Living Index in a stroke population. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 24(2), 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1215398
26.
MillerA.ClemsonL.LanninN. (2011). Measurement properties of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a community-dwelling adult rehabilitation population. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(21–22), 1968–1978. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.553707
27.
NissenS. J.NewmanW. P. (1992). Factors influencing reintegration to normal living after amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 73(6), 548–551.
28.
OkoyeE. C.OyedumS. O.AkosileC. O.OnwuakagbaI. U.IbikunleP. O.OkonkwoU. P.OkekeI. A. (2019). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the reintegration to Normal Living Index into IGBO language among individuals with mobility disability. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 3(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0139-9
29.
ØstlieK.LesjøI. M.FranklinR. J.GarfeltB.SkjeldalO. H.MagnusP. (2012). Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: A population-based survey. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 7(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.635405
30.
PangM. Y.LauR. W.YeungP. K.LiaoL.-R.ChungR. C. (2011). Development and validation of the Chinese version of the reintegration to Normal Living Index for use with stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(3), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0660
31.
PortneyL. G.WatkinsM. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (Vol. 892). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
32.
SchoppenT.BoonstraA.GroothoffJ. W.van SonderenE.GöekenL. N.EismaW. H. (2001). Factors related to successful job reintegration of people with a lower limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10), 1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26074
33.
ŞenerG.GüvenÖ.YiğiterK.ErbahçeciF., & K., B. (1999). Evaluation of amputes, whose prostheses were made between 1974-1999 in Hacettepe University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation in Prosthetics-Biomechanics Unit. In ErdemH. (Ed.), Congress Book of 2. National Congress of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 10–12 October 1999 (pp. 295–303). Ankara.
34.
StarkS. L.EdwardsD. F.HollingsworthH.GrayD. B. (2005). Validation of the reintegration to Normal Living Index in a population of community-dwelling people with mobility limitations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86(2), 344–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.020
35.
TatarY. (2010). Body image and its relationship with exercise and sports in Turkish lower-limb amputees who use prosthesis. Science & Sports, 25(6), 312–317.
36.
ÜnverB.ŞahanT. Y.TürkyılmazS.KaragözoğluA.ÜlgerÖ. (2016). The status of application and physiotherapy-rehabilitation of prosthetics in Turkey. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 28(5), 1534–1537. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1534
37.
WhyteA.CarrollL. (2002). A preliminary examination of the relationship between employment, pain and disability in an amputee population. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(9), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110105213
38.
Wood-DauphineeS.OpzoomerM.WilliamsJ. I.MarchandB.SpitzerW. (1988). Assessment of global function: The reintegration to Normal Living Index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69(8), 583–590.
39.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF).
40.
World Health Organization. (2002). Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF.
41.
YaziciogluK.TaskaynatanM. A.GuzelkucukU.TugcuI. (2007). Effect of playing football (soccer) on balance, strength, and quality of life in unilateral below-knee amputees. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86(10), 800–805. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e318151fc74
42.
YesilS.AkinciB.YenerS.BayraktarF.KarabayO.HavitciogluH.. . .EraslanS. (2009). Predictors of amputation in diabetics with foot ulcer: Single center experience in a large Turkish cohort. Hormones, 8(4), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.14310/horm.2002.1245
