Caregiver appraisal influences care decisions and may place the person with dementia at risk. The Functional Capacity Card Sort (FCCS) was developed to determine caregiver appraisal. The objective of this study was to examine FCCS psychometric properties and utility, using data from a cross-sectional study (N = 86). The FCCS had moderately positive association (convergent validity) with a related activities of daily living (ADL) index (r = .43, p < .0001), weak negative association (discriminant validity) with an unrelated neuropsychiatric symptom index (r = −.14, p = .16), and strong caregiver agreement (interrater reliability) in ranking cards from high to low function, Kendall’s W(5, 72) = 0.83, p = .0001. When compared with occupational therapy assessment, the FCCS distinguished caregiver concordant estimation (17%), underestimation (22%), and overestimation (61%) of function. The FCCS is a valid and reliable tool used in conjunction with formal assessment to identify caregiver over- or underestimation, which has implications for patient safety and caregiver education.
AllenC. K.BlueT. (1998). Cognitive disabilities model: How to make clinical judgments. In KatzN. (Ed.), Cognition and occupation in rehabilitation: Cognitive models for intervention in occupational therapy (pp. 225-280). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
2.
AllenC. K.BlueT.EarhartC. A. (1995). Understanding cognitive performance modes. Ormond Beach, FL: Allen Conferences.
3.
AllenC. K.AustinS. L.DavidS. K.EarhartC. A.McCraithD. B.Riska-WilliamsL. (2007). Manual for the Allen cognitive level screen-5 (ACLS -5) and Large Allen cognitive level screen-5 (LACLS-5). Camarillo, CA: ACLS and LACLS Committee.
ArgüellesS.LoewensteinC. E.EisdorferC.ArgüellesT. (2001). Caregivers’ judgments of the functional abilities of the Alzheimer’s disease patient: Impact of caregivers’ depression and perceived burden. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 14, 91-98.
6.
ArltS.HornungJ.EichenlaubM.JahnH.BullingerM.PetersenC. (2008). The patient with dementia, the caregiver and the doctor: Cognition, depression and quality of life from three perspectives. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23, 604-610.
7.
Bar-YosefC.WeinblattN.KatzN. (1999). Reliability and validity of the cognitive performance test (CPT) in an elderly population in Isreal. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 17(1), 65-79.
8.
BlessedG.TomlinsonB. E.RothM. (1968). The association between quantitative measures of dementia and of senile change in the cerebral gray matter of elderly subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 114, 797-811.
9.
ClarkC. M.EwbankD. C. (1996). Performance of the Dementia Severity Rating Scale: A caregiver questionnaire for rating severity in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 10, 31-39.
10.
CotterE. M.BurgioL. D.RothD. L.GerstleJ.RichardsonP. (2008). Comparison of caregiver and occupational therapist ratings of dementia patients’ performance of activities of daily living. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27, 215-225.
11.
CullumC. M.SaineK.ChanL. D.Martin-CookK.GrayK.WeinerM. F. (2001). Performance-based instrument to assess functional capacity in dementia: The Texas Functional Living Scale. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 14, 103-108.
12.
CummingsJ. L. (1997). The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology, 48, 510-516.
13.
DavisB. A.Martin-CookK.HynanL. S.WeinerM. F. (2006). Caregivers’ perception of dementia patients’ functional ability. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias, 21, 85-91.
14.
DobleS. E.FisherA. G. (1998). The dimensionality and validity of the Older Americans Resources and Services (OARS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 2-23.
15.
DobleS. E.FiskJ. D.RockwoodK. (1999). Assessing the ADL functioning of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: Comparison of family informants’ ratings and performance-based assessment findings. International Psychogeriatrics, 11, 399-409.
16.
EarhartC. A. (2006). Allen diagnostic modules: Manual (2nd ed.). Colchester, CT: S&S Worldwide.
17.
Family Caregiver Alliance. (2006). Caregiver assessment: Principles, guidelines and strategies for change. Report from a national consensus development conference (Vol. 1). San Francisco, CA: Author.
18.
FeldmanH.SauterA.DonaldA.GélinasI.GauthierS.TorfsK.. . . MehnertA. (2001). The Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale: A 12-month study of functional ability in mild to moderate severity Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 15, 89-95.
19.
FisherA. G.Bray JonesK. (2010). Assessment of motor and process skills. Vol. 1: Development, standardization, and administration manual (7th ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
20.
FolsteinM.FolsteinS.McHughP. R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
21.
GelinasI.GauthierL.McIntyreM.GauthierS. (1999). Development of a functional measure for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: The Disability Assessment for Dementia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 471-481.
22.
GitlinL. N.HodgsonN.PiersolC. V.HauckW. W.HessE. (2013). Correlates of quality of life for individuals with dementia living at home: The role of home environment, caregiver and patient-related characteristics. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 587-597.
23.
GitlinL. N.RothD. L.BurgioL. D.LoewensteinD. A.WinterL.NicholsL.. . . MartindaleJ. (2005). Caregiver appraisals of functional dependence in individuals with dementia and associated caregiver upset: Psychometric properties of a new scale and response patterns by caregiver and care recipient characteristics. Journal of Aging and Health, 17, 148-171.
24.
KaragiozisH.GrayS.SaccoJ.ShapiroM.KawasC. (1998). The Direct Assessment of Functional Abilities (DAFA): A comparison to an indirect measure of instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 38, 113-121.
25.
KiyakH. A.TeriL.BorsonS. (1994). Physical and functional health assessment in normal aging and in Alzheimer’s disease: Self-reports vs family reports. The Gerontologist, 34, 324-331.
26.
LoewensteinD. A.ArgüellesS.BravoM.FreemanR. Q.ArgüellesT.AcevedoA.EisdorferC. (2001). Caregivers’ judgments of the functional abilities of the Alzheimer’s disease patient: A comparison of proxy reports and objective measures. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 56, 78-84.
27.
PollardD.OlinD. W. (2005). Allen’s Cognitive Levels: Meeting the challenges of client focused services. Monona, WI: SelectOne Rehab.
28.
RogersJ. C.HolmM. B.BurgioL. D.HsuC.HardinJ. M.McdowellB. J. (2000). Excess disability during morning care in nursing home residents with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 12, 267-282.
29.
RoitmanD. M.KatzN. (1996). Predictive validity of the large Allen Cognitive Levels Tests using the Allen Diagnostic Module in an aged, non-disabled population. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 14(4), 43-59.
30.
WadleyV. G.HarrellL. E.MarsonD. C. (2003). Self- and informant report of financial abilities in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: Reliable and valid?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51, 1621-1626.
31.
YuryC. A.FisherJ. E. (2007). Preventing excess disability in an elderly person with Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical Case Studies, 6, 295-306.
32.
ZanettiO.FrisoniG. B.RozziniF. L.BianchettiA.TrabucchiM. (1998). Validity of direct assessment of functional status as a tool for measuring Alzheimer’s disease severity. Age and Aging, 27, 615-622.
33.
ZanettiO.GeroldiC.FrisoniG. B.BianchettiA.TrabucchiM. (1999). Contrasting results between caregiver’s report and direct assessment of activities of daily living in patients affected by mild and very mild dementia: The contribution of the caregiver’s personal characteristics. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 47, 196-202.
34.
ZankS.FrankS. (2002). Family and professional caregivers’ ratings of dementia symptoms and activities of daily living of day care patients: Do differences change over time?Aging & Mental Health, 6, 161-165.
