This article examines six cases of publicly funded Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy for Latino children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to contribute to thinking about occupational justice. In this ethnographic study of six Latino families of children with ASD in Los Angeles County, all families were offered ABA for their children, but five families experienced occupational challenges leading them to insist on modifications of ABA or to opt out of the service. We consider in each case (a) how the families’ experiences can be understood occupationally, (b) how ABA affected the functionings and capabilities of the children and their families, and (c) how the parents’ accounts relate to occupational justice. Applying the capabilities approach can help operationalize the concept of occupational justice as a tool to evaluate social policy across cases.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
AngellA. M. (2014). Occupation-centered analysis of social difference: Contributions to a socially responsive occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 21(2), 104-116. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.71123.
3.
AngellA. M. (2016). Understanding bilingual Latino parents’ experiences of their children’s autism services in Los Angeles: A critical ethnography (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Los Angeles, USA: University of Southern California.
4.
AngellA. M.SolomonO. (2014). The social life of health records: Understanding families’ experiences of autism. Social Science & Medicine, 117, 50-57. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.02
5.
BailliardA. (2016). Justice, difference, and the capability to function. Journal of Occupational Science, 23, 3-16. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.957886
6.
BlancheE. I.DiazJ.BarrettoT.CermakS. A. (2015). Caregiving experiences of Latino families with children with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69, 1-11. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.017848
ClarkF. A.ParhamD.CarlsonM. E.FrankG.JacksonJ.PierceD.. . . ZemkeR. (1991). Occupational science: Academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 300-310.
10.
DurocherE.GibsonB. E.RappoltS. (2013). Occupational justice: A conceptual review. Journal of Occupational Science, 21, 418-430. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.775692
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
FariasL.Laliberte RudmanD. (2016). A critical interpretive synthesis of the uptake of critical perspectives in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 23, 33-50. doi:10.1080/14427591.2014.989893
14.
FrankG. (2012). The 2010 Ruth Zemke lecture in occupational science occupational therapy/occupational science/occupational justice: Moral commitments and global assemblages. Journal of Occupational Science, 19, 25-35. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.607792
15.
HammellK. W. (2015). Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective. AustralianOccupational Therapy Journal, 62, 78-85. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12183.
16.
HuntL. M.de VoogdK. B. (2005). Clinical myths of the cultural “other”: Implications for Latino patient care. Academic Medicine, 80, 918-924.
17.
Laliberte RudmanD. (2013). Enacting the critical potential of occupational science: Problematizing the “individualizing of occupation.”Journal of Occupational Science, 20, 298-313. doi:10.1080/14427591.2013.803434
18.
LawlorM. C.MattinglyC. (2014). Family perspectives on occupation, health, and disability. In Boyt SchellB. A.GillenG.ScaffaM. E. (Eds.), Willard & Spackman’s occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 150-162). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
19.
LeafJ. B.LeafR.McEachinJ.TaubmanM.Ala’i-RosalesS.RossR. K.. . . WeissM. J. (2016). Applied behavior analysis is a science and, therefore, progressive. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 720-731. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2591-6
20.
LeighJ. P.GrosseS. D.CassadyD.MelnikowJ.Hertz-PicciottoI. (2016). Spending by California’s Department of Developmental Services for persons with autism across demographic and expenditure categories. PLoS ONE, 11(3), e0151970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151970
21.
LovaasO. I. (1987). Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 3-9. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.55.1.3
22.
PattonM. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
PickardK. E.IngersollB. R. (2016). Quality versus quantity: The role of socioeconomic status on parent-reported service knowledge, service use, unmet service needs, and barriers to service use. Autism, 20, 106-115. doi:10.1177/1362361315569745
25.
ReichowB.BartonE. E.BoydB. A.HumeK. (2014). Early intensive behavioral intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 10, 9. doi:10.4073/csr.2014.9
26.
ReissmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
SanjekR. (Ed.). (1990). Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
SegalR.FrankG. (1998). The extraordinary construction of ordinary experience: Scheduling daily life in families with children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5, 141-147. doi:10.3109/11038129809035739
30.
SenA. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
31.
South Central Los Angeles Regional Center. (2015). Total annual expenditures and authorized services by ethnicity or race. Retrieved from http://sclarc.org/pdf/ServByEthnicity.pdf
32.
StadnykR.TownsendE. A.WilcockA. A. (2010). Occupational justice. In ChristiansenC.TownsendE. A. (Eds.), Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed., pp. 329-358). Thorofare, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
TownsendE. A. (2012). Boundaries and bridges to adult mental health: Critical occupational and capabilities perspectives of justice. Journal of Occupational Science, 19, 8-24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.639723
34.
TownsendE. A.MarvalR. (2013). Can professionals actually enable occupational justice?Cadernos de Terapia Ocupacional Da UFSCar, 21, 215-228. doi:10.4322/cto.2013.025
WhitefordG. E.TownsendE. A. (2011). Participatory Occupational Justice Framework (POJF 2010): Enabling occupational participation and inclusion. In KronenbergF.PollardN.SakellariouD. (Eds.), Occupational therapies without borders: Towards an ecology of occupation-based practices (Vol. 2, pp. 65-84). New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
37.
WilcockA. A. (1998). Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65, 248-256. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1630.1999.00174.x
38.
YerxaE. J. (1990). An introduction to occupational science, a foundation for occupational therapy in the 21st century. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 6(4), 1-17. doi:10.1080/J003v06n04_04
