Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This qualitative study explored the perceptions of seven individuals who defined themselves as culturally Deaf about the nature of their participation in both Deaf and hearing communities. This study was conducted in partnership with a community group that advises a municipal administration about disability rights issues. Semi-structured interviews using a phenomenological approach were completed with the aid of American Sign Language interpreters. Data were analyzed using constant comparisons to determine whether emergent themes fit the Person-Environment-Occupation Model. Feedback about the analysis was sought through a member-checking group of participants and themes were adjusted as needed. Participants reported that the main barrier to participation within both the hearing and the Deaf communities was difficulty with communication. This “great divide” resulted in disadvantages in education, limited access to competitive employment, diminished social opportunities, and fewer financial and service resources. The Person-Environment-Occupation Model proved a useful framework for conceptualizing findings.

Keywords

Deaf culture participation Person-Environment-Occupation model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Battison

(1980). Signs have parts: A simple idea. In Baker

& Battison

(Eds.), Sign language and the deaf community: Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe (pp. 35–51). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of the Deaf.

Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists. (2002). Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective (Rev. ed.). Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications ACE.

Cripps

(2002, July). Deaf culture. Retrieved April 10, 2005, from http://www.ccsdeaf.com/culture.html.

Foster

(1989). Social alienation and peer identification: A study of the social construction of Deafness. Human Organization, 48, 226–235.

Foster

(1996). Doing research in deafness: Some considerations and strategies. In Higgins

P. C.

& Nash

J. E.

(Eds.), Understanding deafness socially: Continuities in research and theory (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Harris

, & Bamford

(2001). The uphill struggle: Services for Deaf and hard of hearing people—issues of equality, participation and access. Disability & Society, 16, 969–979.

Holloway

, & Todres

(2003). The status of method: Flexibility, consistency and coherence. Qualitative Research, 3, 345–357.

Jarman

(2004). What is occupation? Interdisciplinary perspectives on defining and classifying human activity. In Christiansen

C. H.

& Townsend

E. A.

, Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (pp. 47–61). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Jones

Atkin

, & Ahmad

W. I. U.

(2001). Supporting Asian Deaf young people and their families: The role of professionals and services. Disability & Society, 16, 51–70.

10.

Kaplan

(1996). The nature of Deaf culture: Implications for speech and hearing professionals. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 24, 71–84.

11.

Lane

(1992). The mask of benevolence: Disabling the deaf community. New York: Alfred Knopf.

12.

Lane

(1995). Constructions of deafness. Disability & Society, 10, 171–190.

13.

Law

Cooper

Strong

Stewart

Rigby

, & Letts

(1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23.

14.

Llewellyn

Cutler

S. K.

, & Stein

(2000). Qualitative research models. In Stein

& Cutler

S. K.

(Eds.), Clinical research in occupational therapy (4th ed., pp. 133–176). San Diego, CA: Singular.

15.

Mindess

Holcomb

T. K.

Langholtz

, & Moyers

P. P.

(1999). Reading between the signs: Intercultural communication for sign language interpreters. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.

16.

Nelson

D. L.

, & Jepson-Thomas

(2003). Occupational form, occupational performance, and a conceptual framework for therapeutic occupation. In Kramer

Hinojosa

, & Royeen

Brasic C.

(Eds.), Perspectives in human occupation: Participation in life (pp. 87–155). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.

17.

Rosen

R. S.

(2003). Jargons for deafness as institutional constructions of the deaf body. Disability & Society, 18, 921–934.

18.

Ryan

, & Bernard

H. R.

(2003). Techniques to identify themes in qualitative data [Electronic version]. Field Methods, 15, 85–109. Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://fmx.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/15/1/85.

19.

Sacks

O. W.

(1989). Seeing voices: A journey into the world of the deaf. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

20.

Stinson

M. S.

(1994). Research on deaf individuals by hearing persons: One deaf researcher's perspective. Journal of the American Deafness and Rehabilitation Association, 27(3), 17–21.

21.

van Manen

(1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario: The Althouse Press.

22.

World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

The Deaf: An Exploration of Their Participation in Community Life

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References