The work of personal assistants is crucial to the quality of life, health, and participation of consumers with spinal cord injuries. The purpose of this study was to describe the barriers and satisfaction experienced by consumers and personal assistants. Transcripts were taken from five focus groups conducted with 24 consumers with spinal cord injuries and 15 personal assistants. Results revealed that both groups experienced problems with the consumer and personal assistant relationship, inadequate reimbursement, and restrictive policies. Satisfaction was experienced when a positive working relationship existed for both groups. Assistants derived satisfaction from the altruistic nature of their work. Future research is needed to identify the most effective methods for personal assistant recruitment, training, and retention. Specific methods to be tested include increasing personal assistant reimbursement, providing training programs for both consumers and assistants, and increasing the flexibility of personal assistance services policies.
Americans with Disabilities Act, U.S.C. 42 §12101 (1990).
2.
BartoldusE.GilleryB.SturgesP. J. (1989). Job-related stress and coping among home-care workers with elderly people. Health and Social Work, 14, 204–210.
3.
BataviaA. I.DeJongG.McNewL. B. (1991). Toward a national personal assistance program: The independent living model of long-term care for persons with disabilities. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 16, 523–545.
4.
BeattyP. W.RichmondG. W.TepperS.DeJongG. (1998). Personal assistance for people with physical disabilities: Consumer direction and satisfaction with services. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 79, 674–677.
5.
BenjaminA. E.MatthiasR.FrankeT. M. (2000). Comparing consumer-direct and agency models for providing supportive services at home. Health Services Research, 35(1, Pt. 2), 351–366.
6.
BenjaminA. E.MatthiasR. E.FrankeT.StoddardS.KrausL. (1998). Comparing client-directed and agency models for providing supportive services at home (Contract Award No. 100-94-00022). Los Angeles: UCLA.
7.
BrownR.FosterL. (2000, December). Cash and counseling: Early experiences in Arkansas (Issue Brief No. 1). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
8.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2003). Demonstration to improve the direct service community workforce in 2003, part of the President's New Freedom Initiative. Retrieved October 29, 2003, from http://www.cms.hhs.gov/newfreedom.
9.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120.
10.
Commonwealth Fund Commission. (1993). The unfinished agenda: Improving the well-being of elderly people living alone. Oakland, CA: World Institute on Disability.
11.
DentonM. A.ZeytinogluI. U.DavisS. (2002). Working in clients' homes: The impact on the metal health and well-being of visiting home care workers. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 21(1), 1–27.
12.
Department of Health and Human Services & Department of Labor. (2003). The future supply of long-term care workers in relation to the aging baby boom generation: Report to Congress. Retrieved October 24, 2003, from http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/ltcwork.htm.
13.
DotyP.KasperJ.LitvakS. (1996). Consumer-directed models of personal care: Lessons from Medicaid. Milbank Quarterly, 74, 377–409.
14.
DotyP.KasperJ.LitvakS.TaylorH. (1994). Consumer choice and the frontline worker. Generations, 18, 65–70.
15.
GlendinningC.HalliwellS.JacobS.RummeryK.TyrerJ. (2000). New kinds of care, new kinds of relationships: How purchasing services affects relationships in giving and receiving personal assistance. Health and Social Care in the Community, 8, 201–211.
16.
Government Accounting Office. (2001). Nursing workforce: Recruitment and retention of nurses and nurse aides is a growing concern (GAO-01-75OT). Washington, DC: General Printing Office.
17.
HagglundK. J.ClarkM. J.FarmerJ. E.ShermanA. K. (2004). A comparison of consumer-directed and agency-directed personal assistance service programs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26, 518–527.
18.
KappM. B. (1996). Enhancing autonomy and choice in selecting and directing long-term care services. Elder Law Journal, 4, 55–97.
Mattson-PrinceJ. (1997). A rational approach to long term care: Comparing the independent living model with agency-based care for persons with high spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord, 35, 326–331.
21.
MitchellJ. M.KempB. J. (1999). Satisfaction ratings and problems experienced with paid personal attendant care: Ethnic comparisons. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 14, 53–67.
22.
MokelkeE. K.HagglundK. J.FarmerJ. E.ShermanA. K.SchoppL. H.ClarkM. J. (2002, March). Personal assistant and consumer satisfaction: Preliminary results.Paper presented at Rehabilitation Psychology 2002: Integrating Science, Practice, and Public Policy, New Orleans, LA.
23.
National Institute on Consumer-Directed Long-Term Services. (1996). Principles of consumer-directed home and community-based services. Washington, DC: The National Council on the Aging, Inc.
24.
North Carolina Division of Facility Services. (1999). Comparing state efforts to address the recruitment and retention of nurse aide and other paraprofessional aide workers. Retrieved October 27, 2003, from http://facility-services.state.nc.us/recruit.pdf.
Paraprofessional Health Care Institute. (2003). The personal assistance services and direct-support workforce: A literature review. New York: Author.
28.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
PrinceJ. M.ManleyM. S.WhiteneckG. G. (1995). Self-managed versus agency-provided personal assistance care for individuals with high level tetraplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 919–923.
30.
SalsbergE. S.MartinianoR. (2002). Health care employment projections: An analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational projections, 2000–2010. Rensselaer, NY: Center for Health Workforce Studies, School of Public Health, SUNY Albany.
31.
ShapiroJ. P. (1994). No pity. New York: Random House.
32.
StoneR. I.WienerJ. M. (2001). Who will care for us?: Addressing the long-term care workforce crisis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
33.
SuperN. (2002). Who will be there to care?: The growing gap between caregiver supply and demand. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
34.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1997). Americans with Disabilities: 1997, Household Economic Studies, Current Population Reports P70–73. Retrieved April 30, 2003, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/disable.
35.
WilnerM. A. (2000). Toward a stable and experienced caregiving workforce. Generations, 24, 60–65.
