The purpose of this study was to determine whether elderly individuals would demonstrate differences in quality of movement when completing a water-pouring task under different levels of perceived risk (i.e., pouring hot water vs. pouring cold water during beverage preparation). Fifty individuals over the age of 65 (M=72.1 years, SD=6.3) participated in the repeated measures, counterbalanced design. Results indicated that participants used less efficient movement dynamics when pouring hot water (higher risk) than when pouring cold water (lower risk). Elders tended to take longer and make more adjustments when pouring hot water than when pouring cold water. Occupational therapists can use this information to better understand the movement dynamics needed during everyday occupations and design therapeutic interventions that appropriately challenge clients.
AtchleyP., & KramerA.F. (2000). Age-related changes in the control of attention in depth. Psychology and Aging, 15, 78–87.
2.
AyresT.J.WoodC.T.SchmidtR.A., & McCarthyR.L. (1988). Risk perception and behavioral choice. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2(1–2), 35–52.
3.
BeauregardR.ThomasJ.J., & NelsonD.L. (1998). Quality of reach during a game and during a rote movement in children with cerebral palsy. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 18(3/4), 67–84.
4.
BrooksV.B. (1974). Some examples of programmed limb movement. Brain Research, 71, 299–308.
5.
BrooksV.B. (1986). The neural basis of motor control. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
CastielloU.BennettK.M., & PaulignanY. (1992). Does the type of prehension influence the kinematics of reaching?Behavioural Brain Research, 50, 7–15.
7.
ChaputS., & ProteauL. (1996). Aging and motor control. Journals of Gerontology. Series B. Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 51B(6), 346–355.
8.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
DeKuiperW.P.NelsonD.L., & WhiteB.E. (1993). Materials-based occupation versus imagery-based occupations versus rote exercise: A replication and extension. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 13, 183–197.
10.
DrorI.E.KatonaM., & MungurK. (1988). Age differences in decision making: To take a risk or not?Gerontology; 44, 67–71.
11.
FastenauP.S.DenburgN.L., & AbelesN. (1996). Age differences in retrieval: Further support for the resource-reduction hypothesis. Psychology and Aging, 11, 140–146.
12.
GeorgopoulosA.P. (1986). On reaching. Annual Review of neuro-science, 9, 147–170.
13.
HagemanP.A.LeibowitzJ.M., & BlankeD. (1995). Age and gender effects on postural control measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 76, 961–965.
14.
HsiehC.L.NelsonD.L.SmithD.A., & PetersonC.Q. (1996). A comparison of performance in added-purpose occupations and rote exercise for dynamic standing balance in persons with hemiplegia. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 10–16.
15.
KircherM.A. (1984). Motivation as a factor of perceived exertion in purposeful versus non-purposeful activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38, 165–170.
16.
KluzikJ.FettersL., & CoryellJ. (1990). Quantification of control: A preliminary study of effects of neurodevelopmental treatment on reaching in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Physical Therapy, 70, 65–78.
17.
KocejaD.M.AllwayD., & EarlesD.R. (1991). Age differences in postural sway during volitional head movement. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1537–1541.
18.
LangE.M.NelsonD.L., & BushM.A. (1992). Comparison of performance in materials-based occupation, imagery-based occupation, and rote exercise in nursing home residents. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 46, 607–611.
19.
MaH.TromblyC.A., & Robinson-PodolskiC. (1999). The effect of context on skill acquisition and transfer. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 138–144.
20.
MarteniukR.G.MacKenzieC.L.JeannerodM.AthenesS., & DugasC. (1987). Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 365–378.
21.
MillerL., & NelsonD.L. (1987). Dual-purpose activity versus single-purpose activity in terms of duration on task, exertion level, and affect. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 7(1), 55–67.
22.
NagasakiH. (1989). Asymmetric velocity and accelerations profiles of human arm movements. Experimental Brain Research, 74, 319–326.
23.
NelsonD.L. (1988). Occupation: Form and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42, 633–641.
24.
NelsonD.L. (1994). Form and function. In RoyeenC.B. (Ed.), AOTA self-study series: The practice of the future: Putting occupation back into therapy (lesson 2), Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.
25.
PohlP.S., & WinsteinC.J. (1998). Age-related effects on temporal strategies to speed motor performance. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity; 6, 45–61.
26.
PorterJ. (1996). Motor learning in the older adult. Issues on Aging, 19, 14–7.
27.
RiccioC.M.NelsonD.L., & BushM.A. (1990). Adding purpose to the repetitive exercise of elderly women through imagery. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44, 714–719.
28.
RiceM.S., & ThomasJ.J. (2000). Perceived risk as a constraint on occupational performance during hot and cold water pouring. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 525–532.
29.
SteinbeckT.M. (1986). Purposeful activity and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40, 529–534.
30.
ThomasJ.J. (1996). Materials-based, imagery-based, and rote exercise occupational forms: Effect on repetitions, heart rate, duration of performance, and self-perceived rest period in well elderly women. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 783–789.
31.
ThomasJ.J.VanderWyk S.A., & BoyerJ. (1999). Contrasting occupational forms: Effects on performance and affect in patients undergoing phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 19, 187–202.
