An Evaluation of the Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound in an Endovascular Practice

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been shown to be superior to arteriography for measuring luminal stenosis and characterizing plaque morphology and content. However, IVUS has not been routinely adopted during endovascular interventions, which may be due to the added time, expense, and general perception of the efficacy of arteriography. The authors performed a prospective study to assess the utility of IVUS in a typical vascular surgery practice consisting of open and catheter-based procedures. Over a recent 7-month period, IVUS was used by one vascular surgeon during 21 procedures in 20 patients at the Emory University affiliated hospitals. The procedures included 11 cases of iliac artery angioplasty or stenting (with or without concomitant infrainguinal reconstruction), six diagnostic iliac arteriograms, three cases of supraaortic trunk stenting, and an innominate arteriogram. Useful information given by IVUS was noted. Estimates of the percent cross-sectional area stenoses of 19 lesions were made by IVUS and arteriography for comparison.

In 6 of 21 (29%) of cases, information from IVUS changed or facilitated intraoperative plans that were made on the basis of arteriography. Three modified procedures included redilating an underexpanded iliac artery stent, dilating a fold in an iliac artery stent-graft, and stenting an iliac artery stenosis, all of which were not detected with arteriography. In three additional cases, IVUS proved to be valuable for precisely positioning stents in the supraaortic vessels when intraoperative arteriography was suboptimal. The mean percent cross-sectional area of the stenoses was not significantly different when measured by IVUS (43.7%) or by arteriography (49.1%) (p=0.42).

IVUS is especially advantageous during complicated stenting procedures and supraaortic revascularization and should be available to the surgeon who performs catheter-based interventions. Diagnostic arteriography will detect most hemodynamically significant lesions, but IVUS can be used to clarify the anatomy in selected cases.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Benenati JF : Intravascular ultrasound, the role in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 33:31-50, 1995.

2. Yamada E , Matsumura M , Kyo S , et al: Usefulness of a prototype intravascular imaging in evaluation of aortic dissection and comparison with angiographic study, transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 75:161-165, 1995.

3. Verbin CS , White RA , Donayre CE , et al: The ideal guidance system for endovascular interventions. J Cardiovasc 37 (Suppl 1 to No. 3):5-9, 1996.

4. White RA , Donayre C , Kopchok G , et al: Intravascular ultrasound: The ultimate tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm assessment and endovascular graft delivery. J Endovasc Surg 4:45-55, 1997.

5. Wilson EP , White RA , Kopchok GE : Utility of intravascular ultrasound in carotid stenting. J Endovasc Surg 3:63-68, 1996.

6. Arko F , McCollough R , Manning L , et al: Use of intravascular ultrasound in the endovascular management of atherosclerotic aortoiliac occlusive disease. Am J Surg 172:546-550, 1996.

7. Scoccianti M , Verbin CS , Kopchok GE , et al: Intravascular ultrasound guidance for peripheral vascular interventions. J Endovasc Surg 1:71-80, 1994.

8. van der Lugt A , Gussenhoven EJ , The SHK , et al: Femorodistal venous bypass evaluated with intravascular ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 9:394-402, 1995.

9. Waller BF , Pinkerton CA , Slack JD : Intravascular ultrasound: A histologic study of vessels during life. Circulation 85:2305-2310, 1992.

10.

10. Tabbara M , Kopchok G , White R : In vitro and in vivo evaluation of intraluminal ultrasound in normal and atherosclerotic arteries. Am J Surg 160:556-560, 1990.

11.

11. Tabbara M , White R , Cavaye D , et al: In vivo human comparison of intravascular ultrasonography and angiography. J Vasc Surg 14:496-504, 1991.