Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

To analyze the current status of various techniques for vascular access in patients with chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis, a retrospective review of 113 patients over a period of nineteen years undergoing either radiocephalic (direct) shunts or polytetra-fluoroethylene (PTFE) shunts was conducted. Accessibility rate was determined as total time of graft function until ultimate failure. Direct shunt was undergone by 93 patients (82%). Accessibility was 89% and 80% at one and five years, respectively. Twenty patients (18%) underwent PTFE shunts. Accessibility was 61% and 29% at one and five years, respectively. Thrombosis, which was the main complication accounting for graft failure, occurred earlier and more frequently in the PTFE group. Results in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were also significantly worse. A direct shunt at the most peripheral site is the most favorable option for vascular access for hemodialysis. Because of poorer results with PTFE, more proximal native vessels (ie, brachial artery to antecubital vein) are preferable if distal shunts are not possible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Burger H , Kootstra G , de Charro F , et al: A survey of vascular access for hemodialysis in the Netherlands. Nephrol Dial Transplant 6:5-10, 1991.

2. Lennard TWJ : Vascular access. Current Practice in Surgery 2:99-105, 1990.

3. Van Gement MJC , Bruymincky CMA : Simulated hemodynamic comparison of arteriovenous fistulas. J Vasc Surg 6:39-44, 1987.

4. Tordoir JH , Heman JM , Kwan TS , et al: Long-term follow-up of the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prosthesis as an arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. Eur J Vasc Surg 2:3-7, 1988.

5. Bitker MO , Barrou B , Monquet C , et al: Biological grafts for vascular access in patients with end-stage renal failure. Vasc Surg 25:353-356, 1991.

6. Anderson CB , Sicard GA , Etheredge EE : Bovine carotid artery and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis. J Surg Res 29:184-188, 1986.

7. Schulak JA , Lukens ML , Mayes JT : Salvage of thrombosed forearm polytetrafluoroethylene vascular access grafts by reversal of flow direction and venous bypass grafting. Am J Surg 161:485-487, 1991.

8. Thomsen MB , Deurell SI , Elfsfrom J , et al: What causes the failures in surgically constructed arteriovenous fistulas. Acta Clin Scand 149:371-371, 1982.

9. Fillinger MF , Kerns B , Bruch D , et al: Does the end-to-end venous anastomosis offer a functional advantage over the end-to-side venous anastomosis in highoutput arteriovenous grafts? J Vasc Surg 12:676-690, 1990.

10.

10. Smith RA , Mallory DL , Wilson GL , et al: Vascular access, past, present, and future. Probl Crit Care 2:200-210, 1988.

11.

11. Domoto DT , Bauman JE , Joist H : Combined aspirin and sulfinpyrazone in the prevention of recurrent hemodialysis vascular access thrombosis. Thromb Res 62:737-743, 1991.

12.

12. Winsett OE , Wolme FJ : Complications of vascular access for hemodialysis. South Med J 5:513-517, 1985.

A Survey of Vascular Access for Hemodialysis

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References