The ideal measurement of cardiac output (CO) would be a system that is ac curate, noninvasive, reproducible, continuous, and technician-free. Impedence cardiography (ICG) has the promise of meeting these criteria. The authors have developed a unique ICG system that analyzes the analog signals from an impe dence cardiograph by an original software program. This was compared against standard thermodilution (TD) measurement of CO (CO TD) in patients in the in tensive care and heart surgical units.
Simultaneous measurements by COTD and by COICG were performed in 65 patients. A good correlation was noted between COTD and COICG over a range of 2.4 to 9.7 L/min (r = 0.73, p < 0.002). If patients with factors known to inter fere with ICG were excluded, an improved correlation was found (r = 0.89, p < .002). COICG followed a similar trend as COTD even in these excluded pa tients. The reproducibility of the COICG was good (coefficient of variation = 0.071).
The COICG was found to be simple and automatic. The results show that it is reproducible and correlates well with COTD. It also has the added advantages of being continuous and noninvasive. Factors such as arrhythmias, severe COPD, and mitral regurgitation were found to interfere with the COICG values. Over all, the versatility of. COICG gives the promise of very good noninvasive monitoring in critical care units and preoperative evaluation in the outpatient setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, et al: Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system . Aerosp Med37:1208-1212, 1966 .
2.
Kubicek WG, Kottke, FJ, Ramos MU, et al: The Minnesota Impedance Cardiograph—theory and applications . Biomed Eng9:140-144, 1974.
3.
Salandin V., Zussci C., Gabriele R., et al: Comparison of cardiac output estimation by thoracic electrical bioimpedance, thermodilution, and Fick methods. Crit Care Med6:1157-1158, 1988.
4.
Spinale FG, Reines HD, Crawford FA: Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: Experimental and clinical studies. Ann Thoric Surg45:421-425, 1988.
5.
Introna Rps, Pruett JK, Crumrine RC, et al: Use of transthoracic bioimpedance to determine cardiac output in pediatric patients. Crit Care Med16:1101-1105, 1988.
6.
Wang X., Sun HH, Adamson D., et al: An impedance cardiography system: A new design. Ann Biomed Eng17:535-566,. 1989.
7.
Judy WV, Langley FM, McCowen KD, et al: Comparative evaluation of the thoracic impedance and isotope dilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Aerosp Med40:532-536, 1969.
8.
Keim HJ, Wallace JM, Thurston H., et al: Impedance cardiography for determination of stroke index. J Appl Physiol41:797-799, 1976.
9.
Naggar CZ, Dobnik DB, Flessas AP, et al: Accuracy of the stroke index as determined by the transthoracic electrical impedence methods. Anesthesiology42:201-205, 1975.
10.
Denniston JC , Maher JT, Reeves JT, et al: Measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance at rest and during exercise. J Appl Physiol40:91-95, 1976.
11.
Kinnen E.: Cardiac output from transthoracic impedance variations. Ann NY Acad Sci170:747-752, 1970.
12.
Miller JC, Horvath SM: Impedance cardiography. Psychopathology15:80-91. 1978.
13.
Bernstein DP : Continuous noninvasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit Care Med14:898-901, 1985.
14.
Donovan KDDobb GJWoods Wpd. et al: Comparison of transthoracic electrical impedance and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output. Crit Care Med14:1038-1044, 1986.
15.
Sramek BB: Noninvasive technique for measurement of cardiac output by means of electrical impedance. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance, Tokyo , Japan 1981, pp 39-42.
16.
Sramek BB, Rose KM, Miyamoto A.: Stroke volume equation with a linear base impedance model and its accuracy, as compared to thermodilution and magnetic flow meter techniques in humans and animals. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Electrical Bioimpedance, Zudar , Yugoslavia, 1983, p 38.
17.
Bernstein DP : A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: Theory and rationale. Crit Care Med14:904-909, 1986.
18.
Appel PL, Kram HB, Mackabee J., et al: Comparison of measurements of cardiac output by bioimpedance and thermodilution in Severely ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med14:933-935, 1986.
19.
Goldstein DS , Cannon RO, Zimlichman R., et al: Clinical evaluation of impedance cardiography . Clin Physiol6:235-251, 1986.
20.
Tremper KK: Continuous noninvasive cardiac output: Are we getting there?Crit Care Med15:278-279, 1987.
21.
Muze M., Ebert TJ, Tristani FE, et al: Determination of cardiac output using ensemble averaged impedance cardiograms. J Appl Physiol58:200-205, 1985.
22.
Quail AW, Traugott FM: Effects of changing hematocrit, ventricular rate, and myocardial inotropy on the accuracy of impedance cardiography. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol8:335-341, 1981.
23.
Mohaptra SN , Costeloe KL, Hill DW: Blood resistivity and its implications for the calculation of cardiac output by the thoracic electrical impedance technique . Intensive Care Med3:63, 1977.
24.
Demeter RJ, Toth PD, Hawk T., et al: The use of noninvasive impedance to determine cardiac output: Factors affecting its accuracy. Am J Noninvasive Cardiol2:112-118, 1988.
25.
Gastfriend RJ, Van De Water JM, Leonard ML, et al: Impedance cardiography—current status and clinical applications. Am Surg52:636-640, 1986.
26.
Williams BO , Caird FI: Accuracy of the impedance cardiogram in the measurement of cardiac output in the elderly. Age Ageing14:277-281, 1985.
27.
Penny BC: Theory and cardiac applications of electrical impedance measurements. CRCCrit Rev Biomed Eng13:227 = 281, 1986.
28.
Enghoff E., Lovheim O.: A comparison between the transthoracic electrical impedance method and the direct Fick and dye dilution methods for cardiac output measurements in man . Scand J Clin Lab Invest39:585-590, 1979.
29.
Berman IR, Scheetz WL, Jenkins EB, et al: Transthoracic electrical impedance as a guide to intravascular overload. Arch Surg102:61-64, 1971.
30.
Pomerantz M. , Delgado F., Eiseman B.: Clinical evaluation of transthoracic electrical impedance as a guide to intrathoracic fluid volumes . Ann Surg171:868-891, 1970.
31.
Van De Water JM, Watring WG, Linton LA, et al: Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications. Surg Gynecol Obstet135:229-233, 1972.
32.
Van De Water JM, Mount BG, Barela JR, et al: Monitoring the chest with impedance . Chest64:597-603, 1973.
33.
Van De Water JM, Miller IT, Milne Enc, et al: Impedance plethysmography: Noninvasive means of monitoring the thoracic surgery patient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg60:641-647, 1970.
34.
Levett JM, Replogle RL: Thermodilution cardiac output: A critical analysis and review of the literature . J Surg Res27:392, 1979.
35.
van Grondelle A., Ditchey RV, Groves BM, et al: Thermodilution method overestimates low cardiac output in humans. Am J Physiol245:H690-695, 1986.
