Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-10
Complications and Failure of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation Procedures in Patients With Lower Extremity Varicose Veins in a 5-Year Follow-Up
Thermal ablation techniques have gradually replaced Babcock procedure in varicose vein treatment.
Aim:
A comparative quantitative–qualitative analysis of complications and failure of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in a 5-year follow-up.
Materials and Methods:
One hundred ten adult participants with varicose veins clinical grade C2 to C6, treated for isolated great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) insufficiency in a single lower extremity in 2009 to 2010, were enrolled and subdivided into EVLA (n = 56) and RFA (n = 54) groups. Both groups were compared for demography, disease stage, affected veins, perioperative, and postoperative complications as well as treatment efficacy.
Results:
The perioperative and postoperative complications were statistically insignificant. Treatment efficacy, expressed as the number of participants with recurrent varicosity and recanalization, was comparable in both groups. The clinically significant recanalization rate was 3.6% and 5.6% in EVLA and RFA groups, respectively.
Conclusion:
Endovenous laser ablation and RFA for the management of lower extremity varicose vein offer comparable efficacy and safety in a 5-year follow-up.
NavarroLMinRJBonéC. Endovenous laser: a new minimally invasive method of treatment for varicose veins—preliminary observations using an 810 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(2):117–122.
3.
ProebstleTMGülDKarglAKnopJ. Endovenous laser treatment of the lesser saphenous vein with a 940-nm diode laser: early results. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(4):357–361.
4.
DunnCWKabnickLSMerchantRFOwensRWeissRA. Endovascular radiofrequency obliteration using 90 degrees C for treatment of great saphenous vein. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20(5):625–629.
5.
WeissRA. Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency versus 810 nm diode laser occlusion of large veins in an animal model. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(1):56–61.
6.
ProebstleTMVagoBAlmJGöckeritzOLebardCPichotO. Treatment of the incompetent great saphenous vein by endovenous radiofrequency powered segmental thermal ablation: first clinical experience. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47(1):151–156.
7.
NicoliniP; Closure Group. Treatment of primary varicose veins by endovenous obliteration with the VNUS closure system: results of a prospective multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(4):433–439.
8.
PichotOKabnickLSCretonDMerchantRFSchuller-PetroviaeSChandlerJG. Duplex ultrasound scan findings two years after great saphenous vein radiofrequency endovenous obliteration. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(1):189–195.
9.
OgawaTHoshinoSMidorikawaHSatoK. Clinical results of radiofrequency endovenous obliteration for varicose veins. Surg Today. 2005;35(1):47–51.
10.
ZanSContessaLVarettoG. Radiofrequency minimally invasive endovascular treatment of lower limbs varicose veins: clinical experience and literature review [in English, Italian]. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2007;55(4):443–458.
11.
ProebstleTMMoehlerTGülDHerdemannS. Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1320 nm Nd: YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(12):1678–1683.
12.
AlmeidaJIRainesJK. Radiofrequency ablation and laser ablation in the treatment of varicose veins. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20(4):547–552.
13.
GibsonKDFerrisBLPolissarNNeradilekBPepperD. Endovenous laser treatment of the small [corrected] saphenous vein: efficacy and complications. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(4):795–801.
14.
RaviRRodriguez-LopezJATraylerEABarrettDARamaiahVDiethrichEB. Endovenous ablation of incompetent saphenous veins: a large single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13(2):244–248.
15.
DesmyttèreJGrardCWassmerBMordonS. Endovenous 980-nm laser treatment of saphenous veins in a series of 500 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(6):1242–1247.
16.
MerchantRFDePalmaRGKabnickLS. Endovascular obliteration of saphenous reflux: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35(6):1190–1196.
17.
PerrinM. Recurrent varicose veins: etiology and management. In: GloviczkiP, ed. Handbook of Venous Disorders. London, UK: Hodder Arnold Publishers Ltd; 2009:447–456.
18.
KostasTIoannouCVTouloupakisE. Recurrent varicose veins after surgery: a new appraisal of a common and complex problem in vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27(3):275–282.
19.
MerchantRFPichotO; Closure Study Group. Long-term outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration of saphenous reflux as a treatment for superficial venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(3):502–509.
20.
HolmeJBSkajaaKHolmeK. Incidence of lesions of the saphenous nerve after partial or complete stripping of the long saphenous vein. Acta Chir Scand. 1990;156(2):145–148.
21.
WoodJJChantHLaugharneMChantTMitchellDC. A prospective study of cutaneous nerve injury following long saphenous vein surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30(6):654–658.
22.
ChandlerJGPichotOSessaCSchuller-PetrovićSOsseFJBerganJJ. Defining the role of extended saphenofemoral junction ligation: a prospective comparative study. J Vasc Surg. 2002;32(5):941–953.
23.
SybrandyJEWittensCH. Initial experiences in endovenous treatment of saphenous vein reflux. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(6):1207–1212.
24.
LurieFCretonDEklofB. Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(2):207–214.
25.
SubramoniaSLeesT. Randomized clinical trial of radiofrequency ablation or conventional high ligation and stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2010;97(3):328–336.
26.
FernándezCFRoizentalMCarvalloJ. Combined endovenous laser therapy and microphlebectomy in the treatment of varicose veins: efficacy and complications of a large single-center experience. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(4):947–952.
SharifMASoongCVLauLLCorvanRLeeBHannonRJ. Endovenous laser treatment for long saphenous vein incompetence. Br J Surg. 2006;93(7):831–835.
29.
MunavalliGSWeissRA. Complications of sclerotherapy. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2007;26(1):22–28.
30.
GoldmanMPSadickNSWeissRA. Cutaneous necrosis, telangiectatic matting, and hyperpigmentation following sclerotherapy. etiology, prevention, and treatment. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(1):19–29.
31.
AngioDynamics, Inc. VenaCure Procedure Kit Featuring NeverTouch Gold-Tipped Fiber Instructions For Use. Queensbury, NY: AngioDynamics, Inc; 2007.
32.
VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc. VNUS ClosureFAST Catheter Instructions For Use. San Jose, CA: VNUS Medical Technologies, Inc; 2007.
33.
FerreiraARamosJCerqueiraASampaioSDe AlbuquerqueRR. Radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation in chronic venous disorders: a single center experience [in Portuguese]. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2011;18(2):123–127.
34.
MlosekRKWoźniakWMalinowskaSMigdaBSerafin-KrólMMiłekT. The removal of post-sclerotherapy pigmentation following sclerotherapy alone or in combination with crossectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(1):100–105.
35.
MlosekRKMigdaBWoźniakWMalinowskaSSłapaR. Ultrasound image of hyperpigmentation in chronic venous insufficiency [in Polish]. Ultrasonografia. 2011;47(4):28–35.
