Endovascular therapy has become increasingly preferred in the diagnosis and treatment of various conditions. The choice of arterial access usually depends on the type of procedure being performed with most via the common femoral artery and increasingly via the radial artery. Percutaneous access via the brachial artery has however been approached with caution due to the perceived increased risk for development of complications. Percutaneous brachial artery access (pBAA) has insufficient evidence when compared to femoral and radial access, with no large-scale studies available. The objective of this study is to review the literature and report the clinical and radiological complications associated with pBAA.
Methods
EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL and Medline were searched for existing data on the complications associated with pBAA. Systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out on the data of 31 studies.
Results
The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicates that the probability of post procedural haematoma was 4.76%, haemorrhage 1.43%, perforation 1.11% pseudoaneurysm 1.06%, spasm 0.9%, thrombus 0.55%, neuropathy 0.53%, occlusion 0.51%, ischaemia 0.37% and infection 0.24 %. Non-target vessel puncture, stenosis and stroke had a 0% incidence among the assessed population.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence to support clinical decision making when it comes to the utility of pBAA in endovascular diagnosis or therapy. The results demonstrate that pBAA is relatively safe with a low incidence of serious complications and thereby provide the clinician with the option of an alternate access point when planning treatment.
DohertyMG. Value of interventional Radiology: past, present, and future. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2019;36(1):26-28. doi:10.1055/S-0039-1679951
2.
KwanSWTalenfeldADBrunnerMC. The top three Health Care developments impacting the practice of interventional Radiology in the Next decade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207(4):731-736. doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16435.
3.
ReubenBCWhittenMGSarfatiMKraissLW. Increasing use of endovascular therapy in acute arterial injuries: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(6):1222-1226. doi:10.1016/J.JVS.2007.08.023
4.
SrinivasanVMLangFFChenSR, et al.Advances in endovascular neuro-oncology: endovascular selective intra-arterial (ESIA) infusion of targeted biologic therapy for brain tumors. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(2):197-203. doi:10.1136/NEURINTSURG-2019-015137
5.
BrancoBCDuBoseJJZhanLX, et al.Trends and outcomes of endovascular therapy in the management of civilian vascular injuries. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(5):1297-1307. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.028
6.
MalkawiAHHinchliffeRJHoltPJLoftusIMThompsonMM. Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(6):676-682. doi:10.1016/J.EJVS.2010.02.001
7.
LinSKConwayAMZhouA, et al.Periprocedural outcomes of Popliteal vs upper extremity access in the treatment of Superficial femoral artery occlusive disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28(4):567-574. doi:10.1177/15266028211012402.
8.
RoczniakJKoziołekWPiechockiM, et al.Comparison of access site-related complications and quality of life in patients after invasive cardiology procedures according to the use of radial, femoral, or brachial approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6151. doi:10.3390/IJERPH18116151
9.
SlimanHEitanAShiranAZafrirBJaffeR. Transbrachial secondary vascular access in transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures: a single-centre retrospective analysis. Heart Lung Circ. 2022;31(7):1023-1028. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2022.01.013
10.
LentzCMZogajDWesselHKZeebregtsCJBokkersRPHvan der LaanMJ. Brachial and axillary artery vascular access for endovascular interventions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;81:292-299. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.09.052
AppeltKTakesMZechCJBlackhamKSchubertT. Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery puncture: effect of live ultrasound guidance. CVIR Endovasc. 2021;4(1):74-77. doi:10.1186/S42155-021-00262-2/FIGURES/3
13.
DeCarloCLatzCABoitanoLT, et al.Percutaneous brachial access associated with increased incidence of complications compared with open exposure for peripheral vascular interventions in a contemporary series. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(5):1723-1730. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.143
14.
FranzRWTangaCFHerrmannJW. Treatment of peripheral arterial disease via percutaneous brachial artery access. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(2):461-465. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.050
15.
GainesPAReidyJF. Percutaneous high brachial aortography: a safe alternative to the translumbar approach. Clin Radiol. 1986;37(6):595-597. doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(86)80036-8
16.
GanHWYipHKWuCJ. Brachial approach for coronary angiography and intervention: totally obsolete, or a feasible alternative when radial access is not possible?Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010;39(5):368-373. doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V39N5p368
17.
KamadaROFergussonDJGItagakiRK. Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1988;15(2):132-133. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810150214
18.
LaarmanGJKiemeneijFvan der WiekenRTijssenJGSuwargandaJSSlagboomT. A pilot study of coronary angioplasty in outpatients. Heart. 1994;72(1):12-15. doi:10.1136/HRT.72.1.12
19.
MaddenNJCalligaroKDZhengHTroutmanDADoughertyMJ. Outcomes of brachial artery access for endovascular interventions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;56:81-86. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2018.07.061
20.
MeertensMMde HaanMWSchurinkGWHMeesBME. A Stopped pilot study of the ProGlide closure device after transbrachial endovascular interventions. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26(5):727-731. doi:10.1177/1526602819862775.
21.
OnishiSSakamotoSSadatomoTShimizuKHaraTKurisuK. Stenting for Innominate artery stenosis under double-filter protection of the anterior and posterior circulation via the right brachial artery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;63:454. e5. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.07.012
22.
TalleyJDSmithSMWalton‐ShirleyM, et al.A prospective randomized study of 4.1 French catheters utilizing the percutaneous right brachial approach for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992;26(1):55-60. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810260113
23.
TamanahaYSakakuraKTaniguchiY, et al.Comparison of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysm between brachial access and femoral access. Int Heart J. 2019;60(5):1030-1036. doi:10.1536/IHJ.18-551
24.
van DijkLJDvan NoordDvan MierloMBijdevaateDCBrunoMJMoelkerA. Single-center retrospective comparative analysis of transradial, transbrachial, and transfemoral approach for Mesenteric arterial procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(1):130-138. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2019.08.026
25.
FergussonDJGKamadaRO. Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for left heart catheterization using a sheath. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1981;7(1):111-114. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810070116
26.
GordonLHBrownMBrownOWBrownEM. Alternative sites for continuous arterial monitoring. South Med J. 1984;77(12):1498-1500. doi:10.1097/00007611-198412000-00006
27.
HeenanSDGrubnicSBuckenhamTMBelliAM. Transbrachial arteriography: Indications and complications. Brain Lang. 1996;51(3):205-209. doi:10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80324-2
28.
KamiyaHOhsugiSOhnoMHoribaMHayashiH. Coronary angiography by means of the percutaneous transbrachial approach. 1991;179(3):863-866. doi:10.1148/RADIOLOGY.179.3.2028007
29.
MaouadJHebertJLFernandezFGayJ. Percutaneous brachial approach using the femoral artery sheath for left heart catheterization and selective coronary angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1985;11(5):539-546. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810110514
30.
MorinMEWillensBAKussPA. Carotid artery: percutaneous transbrachial selective arteriography with a 4-F catheter. 1989;171(3):868-870. doi:10.1148/RADIOLOGY.171.3.2717768
31.
ParvizYRoweRVijayanS, et al.Percutaneous brachial artery access for coronary artery procedures: feasible and safe in the current era. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015;16(8):447-449. doi:10.1016/J.CARREV.2015.08.004
32.
PepineCJvon GuntenCHillJA, et al.Percutaneous brachial catheterization using a modified sheath and new catheter system. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1984;10(6):637-642. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810100618
33.
WatkinsonAFHartnellGG. Complications of direct brachial artery puncture for arteriography: a comparison of techniques. Clin Radiol. 1991;44(3):189-191. doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80868-2
34.
CohenMRentropKPCohenBM. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous entry of the brachial artery versus cutdown and arteriotomy for left-sided cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57(8):682-684. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(86)90859-3
Ben AhmedSBenezitMHazartJBrouatADanielGRossetE. Outcomes of the endovascular treatment for the Supra-aortic Trunks occlusive disease: a 14-year Monocentric experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;33:55-66. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2016.02.003
37.
BushCAVanfossenDBKolibashAJ, et al.Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography using 5 French preformed (Judkins) catheters from the percutaneous right brachial approach: a comparative analysis with the femoral approach. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;29(4):267-272. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810290403
38.
SpaccaventoLJBreisblattWM. Use of femoral artery guiding catheters via the left brachial artery for transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990;20(3):182-184. doi:10.1002/CCD.1810200306
Alvarez-TostadoJAMoiseMABenaJF, et al.The brachial artery: a critical access for endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(2):378-385. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.017
41.
ArmstrongPJHanDCBaxterJAElmoreJRFranklinDP. Complication rates of percutaneous brachial artery access in peripheral vascular angiography. Ann Vasc Surg. 2003;17(1):107-110. doi:10.1007/s10016-001-0339-6
42.
OneissiMSweidATjoumakarisS, et al.Access-site complications in transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: a systematic review of incidence rates and management strategies. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19(4):353-363. doi:10.1093/ONS/OPAA096
43.
NarsinhKHMirzaMHCatonMT, et al.Radial artery access for neuroendovascular procedures: safety review and complications. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(12):1132-1138. doi:10.1136/NEURINTSURG-2021-017325
44.
GargNUmamaheswarKLKapoorA, et al.Incidence and predictors of forearm hematoma during the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. Indian Heart J. 2019;71(2):136-142. doi:10.1016/J.IHJ.2019.04.014
45.
BhattySCookeRJovinRS& I. Femoral vascular access-site complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: diagnosis and management. Interv Cardiol (Lond). 2011;3(4):503-514. doi:10.2217/ICA.11.49
46.
MadiaC. Management trends for postcatheterization femoral artery pseudoaneurysms. J Am Acad Physician Assist. 2019;32(6):15-18. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000558236.60240.02
RiangwiwatTBlankenshipJC. Vascular complications of transradial access for cardiac catheterization. US Cardiol. 2021;15:3. doi:10.15420/USC.2020.23
49.
RajuSEisenbergNMontbriandJ, et al.Vascular complications and procedures following Transcatheter aortic Valve Implantation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(3):437-444. doi:10.1016/J.EJVS.2019.03.014
50.
PandieSMehtaSRCantorWJ, et al.Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography/intervention in Women with acute coronary syndromes: Insights from the RIVAL trial (radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(4):505-512. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2014.11.017
51.
GhaithAKel NaamaniKMualemW, et al.Transradial versus transfemoral Approaches in diagnostic and therapeutic neuroendovascular interventions: a meta-analysis of current literature. World Neurosurg. 2022;164:e694-e705. doi:10.1016/J.WNEU.2022.05.031
52.
ProttyMGallagherSSharpASP, et al.Brachial arterial access for PCI: an analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database. EuroIntervention. 2022;17(13):1100-1103. doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00294
53.
SchellenbergMHawleyLBiswasSClarkDHCobbJP. Complications following brachial arterial catheterization in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg. 2020;86(10):1260-1263. doi:10.1177/0003134820964211
54.
SetoAHRobertsJSAbu-FadelMS, et al.Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (radial artery access with ultrasound trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):283-291. doi:10.1016/J.JCIN.2014.05.036
55.
KoziarzAKennedySAEl-KarimGA, et al.The Use of vascular closure devices for brachial artery access: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2023;34(4):677-684. e5. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2022.12.022
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
