The Upper-Arm Basilic-Cephalic Loop: A Valueable Alternative for Below-Knee Arterial Reconstruction

Abstract

Introduction:

Despite advances of endovascular interventions, bypass surgery remains the gold standard for treatment of long and complex arterial occlusions in the lower limb. Autologous vein is regarded superior to other options. As the graft of first choice, the great saphenous vein (GSV) is often not available due to previous bypass, stripping or poor quality. Other options like arm veins (AV) are important alternatives. As forearm portions of AVs are often unusable, a graft created from the upper arm basilic and cephalic veins provides a valuable alternative.

Patients and Methods:

We analyzed consecutive patients treated at an academic tertiary referral center between 01/1998 and 07/2018 using arm veins as the main peripheral bypass graft. Study endpoints were primary patency, secondary patency, limb salvage and survival.

Results:

In the observed time period 2702 bypass procedures were performed at our institution for below-knee arterial reconstructions. Vein grafts used included the ipsilateral GSV (iGSV; n = 1937/71.7%), contralateral GSV (cGSV; 192/7.1%), small saphenous vein (SSV; 133/4.9%), prosthetic conduits (61/2.3%) and different configurations of AV (379/14%). In the majority of patients receiving AV grafts a complete continuous cephalic or basilic vein (CAV) was used (n = 292/77%). If it was not possible to use major parts of these 2 veins, either spliced arm vein grafts (SAV) (42/11%) or an upper arm basilic-cephalic loop graft (45/12%) were used. Median follow-up was 27 (interquartile range: 8-50) months. After 3 years secondary patency (CAV: 85%; SAV: 62%; loop: 66%; p = 0.125) and limb salvage rates (CAV: 79%, SAV: 68%; loop: 79%; p = 0.346) were similar between the 3 bypass options.

Conclusion:

The encouraging results of alternative AV configurations highlight their value in case the basilic or cephalic veins are not useable in continuity. Especially for infragenual redo-bypass procedures, these techniques should be considered to offer patients durable revascularization options.

Keywords

peripheral vein bypass alternative vein bypass arm vein peripheral artery disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Taylor

Edwards

Brant

Phinney

Porter

. Autogenous reversed vein bypass for lower extremity ischemia in patients with absent or inadequate greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg. 1987;153(5):505–510.

Kent

Donaldson

Attinger

Couch

Mannick

Whittemore

. Femoropopliteal reconstruction for claudication. The risk to life and limb. Arch Surg. 1988;123(10):1196–1198.

Londrey

Bosher

Brown

Stoneburner

Pancoast

Davis

. Infrainguinal reconstruction with arm vein, lesser saphenous vein, and remnants of greater saphenous vein: a report of 257 cases. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20(3):451–456; discussion 456-457.

Gentile

Lee

Montea

Taylor

Edwards

Porter

. Results of bypass to the popliteal and tibial arteries with alternative sources of autogenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(2):272–279; discussion 279-280.

Hölzenbein

Pomposelli

Miller

, et al. Results of a policy with arm veins used as the first alternative to an unavailable ipsilateral greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(1):130–140.

Chang

Paty

Shah

Leather

. The lesser saphenous vein: an underappreciated source of autogenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15(1):152–156; discussion 156-157.

Nierlich

Metzger

Enzmann

, et al. The small saphenous vein: an underestimated source for autologous distal vein bypass. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(4):556–563.

Avgerinos

Sachdev

Naddaf

, et al. Autologous alternative veins may not provide better outcomes than prosthetic conduits for below-knee bypass when great saphenous vein is unavailable. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(2):385–391.

McPhee

Barshes

Ozaki

Nguyen

Belkin

. Optimal conduit choice in the absence of single-segment great saphenous vein for below-knee popliteal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(4):1008–1014.

10.

Brochado Neto

Sandri

Kalaf

, et al. Arm vein as an alternative autogenous conduit for infragenicular bypass in the treatment of critical limb ischaemia: a 15 year experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;47(6):609–614.

11.

Arvela

Söderström

Albäck

Aho

Venermo

Lepäntalo

. Arm vein conduit vs prosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(3):616–623.

12.

Kakkar

. The cephalic vein as a peripheral vascular graft. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;128(3):551–556.

13.

Park

Kim

Yang

Dong-Lk

. Comparisons between prosthetic vascular graft and saphenous vein graft in femoro-popliteal bypass. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;87(1):35–40.

14.

LoGerfo

Paniszyn

Menzoian

. A new arm vein graft for distal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5(6):889–891.

15.

Grigg

Wolfe

. Combination reversed and non-reversed upper arm vein for femoro-distal grafting. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1988;2(1):49–52.

16.

Hölzenbein

Pomposelli

Miller

, et al. The upper arm basilic-cephalic loop for distal bypass grafting: technical considerations and follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 1995;21(4):586–592; discussion 592-584.

17.

Enzmann

Nierlich

Aspalter

, et al. Nitinol stent versus bypass in long femoropopliteal lesions: 2-year results of a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2019;12(24):2541–2549.

18.

Aboyans

Ricco

Bartelink

MEL

, et al. 2017 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018;71(2):111.

19.

Klinkert

Schepers

Burger

van Bockel

Breslau

. Vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(1):149–155.

20.

Arvela

Venermo

Söderström

Albäck

Lepäntalo

. Outcome of infrainguinal single-segment great saphenous vein bypass for critical limb ischemia is superior to alternative autologous vein bypass, especially in patients with high operative risk. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012;26(3):396–403.

21.

Michaels

. Choice of material for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass graft. Br J Surg. 1989;76(1):7–14.

22.

Linni

Aspalter

Butturini

, et al. Arm veins versus contralateral greater saphenous veins for lower extremity bypass reconstruction: preliminary data of a randomized study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(3):551–559.

23.

Calligaro

Syrek

Dougherty

Rua

Raviola

DeLaurentis

. Use of arm and lesser saphenous vein compared with prosthetic grafts for infrapopliteal arterial bypass: are they worth the effort? J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(6):919–924; discussion 925-917.

24.

Schulman

Badhey

. Late results and angiographic evaluation of arm veins as long bypass grafts. Surgery. 1982;92(6):1032–1041.

25.

Varcoe

Chee

Subramaniam

Roach

Benveniste

Fitridge

. Arm vein as a last autogenous option for infrainguinal bypass surgery: it is worth the effort. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(6):737–741.

26.

Wilson

Davies

Currie

, et al. Vein graft stenosis: incidence and intervention. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11(2):164–169.

27.

Mills

. Mechanisms of vein graft failure: the location, distribution, and characteristics of lesions that predispose to graft failure. Semin Vasc Surg. 1993;6(2):78–91.

28.

Venermo

Sprynger

Desormai

, et al. Editor’s choice—follow-up of patients after revascularisation for peripheral arterial diseases: a consensus document from the European society of cardiology working group on aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(5):641–653.

29.

Bradbury

; BASIL trial Investigators and Participants. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial in perspective. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5 suppl):1S–4S.

30.

Bodewes

TCF

Ultee

KHJ

Soden

, et al. Perioperative outcomes of infrainguinal bypass surgery in patients with and without prior revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(5):1354–1365.e1352.