Do Women Have Worse Amputation-Free Survival Than Men Following Endovascular Procedures for Peripheral Arterial Disease? An Evaluation of the California State-Wide Database
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2015
Do Women Have Worse Amputation-Free Survival Than Men Following Endovascular Procedures for Peripheral Arterial Disease? An Evaluation of the California State-Wide Database
Female gender has been shown to negatively affect the outcomes of surgical bypass for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We examined gender-related disparities in outcomes of endovascular PAD procedures in a large population-based study.
Methods:
We used discharge data from California hospitals to identify patients who had PAD interventions during 2005 to 2009. Logistic regression was used for 12-month reintervention, and Cox proportional hazard regression was used for amputation-free survival comparisons.
Results:
A total of 25 635 patients had endovascular procedures (11 389 [44.4%] women). Women were more likely than men (34.5% vs 30.1%, P < .0001) to have critical limb ischemia (CLI). Twelve-month reintervention rate in women was similar to men. Amputation-free survival was better among women than men (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.93, P = .0006).
Conclusion:
Despite presenting more frequently with CLI, women had better amputation-free survival than men following endovascular procedures. Future research should determine whether findings favor one type of PAD treatment modality over another for women.
GoodneyPPBeckAWNagleJWelchHGZwolakRM. National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(1):54–60.
2.
EgorovaNVouyoukaAGQuinJ. Analysis of gender-related differences in lower extremity peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(2):372–378. e1; discussion 378–379.
3.
VouyoukaAGEgorovaNNSalloumA. Lessons learned from the analysis of gender effect on risk factors and procedural outcomes of lower extremity arterial disease. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(5):1196–1202.
4.
CoxD. Regression models and life-tables. J Royal Stat Soc. 1972;34(2):187–220.
5.
DiehmCSchusterAAllenbergJR. High prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and co-morbidity in 6880 primary care patients: cross-sectional study. Atherosclerosis. 2004;172(1):95–105.
6.
OstchegaYPaulose-RamRDillonCFGuQHughesJP. Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and risk factors in persons aged 60 and older: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(4):583–589.
7.
EslamiMHZayaruznyMFitzgeraldGA. The adverse effects of race, insurance status, and low income on the rate of amputation in patients presenting with lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(1):55–59.
8.
NormanPESemmensJBLawrence-BrownMHolmanCD. The influence of gender on outcome following peripheral vascular surgery: a review. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8(2):111–115.
9.
BelkinMConteMSDonaldsonMCMannickJAWhittemoreAD. The impact of gender on the results of arterial bypass with in situ greater saphenous vein. Am J Surg. 1995;170(2):97–102.
10.
MagnantJGCronenwettJLWalshDBSchneiderJRBessoSRZwolakRM. Surgical treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease in women. J Vasc Surg. 1993;17(1):67–76; discussion 76-78.
11.
NguyenLLBrahmanandamSBandykDF. Female gender and oral anticoagulants are associated with wound complications in lower extremity vein bypass: an analysis of 1404 operations for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(6):1191–1197.
12.
NguyenLLHeveloneNRogersSO. Disparity in outcomes of surgical revascularization for limb salvage: race and gender are synergistic determinants of vein graft failure and limb loss. Circulation. 2009;119(1):123–130.
13.
Al-OmranMTuJVJohnstonKWMamdaniMMKuceyDS. Use of interventional procedures for peripheral arterial occlusive disease in Ontario between 1991 and 1998: a population-based study. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(2):289–295.
14.
BallottaEGruppoMLorenzettiRPiattoGDaGiauGToniatoA. The impact of gender on outcome after infrainguinal arterial reconstructions for peripheral occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(2):343–352.
DeRubertisBGVouyoukaARheeSJ. Percutaneous intervention for infrainguinal occlusive disease in women: equivalent outcomes despite increased severity of disease compared with men. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(1):150–157; discussion 157-158.
17.
BushRLKallenMALilesDRBatesJTPetersenLA. Knowledge and awareness of peripheral vascular disease are poor among women at risk for cardiovascular disease. J Surg Res. 2008;145(2):313–319.
18.
HealdCLFowkesFGMurrayGDPriceJF; Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration. Risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease associated with the ankle-brachial index: Systematic review. Atherosclerosis. 2006;189(1):61–69.
19.
HirschATCriquiMHTreat-JacobsonD. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286(11):1317–1324.
20.
AbandoAAkopianGKatzSG. Patient sex and success of peripheral percutaneous transluminal arterial angioplasty. Arch Surg. 2005;140(8):757–761.
21.
KrikorianRKKramerPHVacekJL. Percutaneous revascularization of lower extremity arterial disease in females compared to males. J Invasive Cardiol. 1997;9(5):333–338.
22.
TimaranCHStevensSLFreemanMBGoldmanMH. External iliac and common iliac artery angioplasty and stenting in men and women. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34(3):440–446.
23.
TimaranCHStevensSLFreemanMBGoldmanMH. Predictors for adverse outcome after iliac angioplasty and stenting for limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(3):507–513.
24.
SchluterMReimersBCastriotaF. Impact of diabetes, patient age, and gender on the 30-day incidence of stroke and death in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting with embolus protection: a post-hoc subanalysis of a prospective multicenter registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14(3):271–278.
25.
FeinglassJSohnMWRodriguezHMartinGJPearceWH. Perioperative outcomes and amputation-free survival after lower extremity bypass surgery in California hospitals, 1996-1999, with follow-up through 2004. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50(4):776–783. e1.
