LederleFAFreischlagJAKyriakidesTC. Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009; 302(14): 1535–1542.
4.
RamananBGuptaPKSundaramA. Development of a risk index for prediction of mortality after open aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 58(4): 871–878.
5.
BirkmeyerJDSiewersAEFinlaysonEV. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15): 1128–1137.
6.
McCutcheonBATalaminiMAChangDCRoseJABandykDFWilsonSE. The comparative effectiveness of surgeons over interventionalists in endovascular repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Surg. 2013; 258(3): 476–482.
7.
LawsonEHGibbonsMMIngrahamAMShekellePGKoCY. Appropriateness criteria to assess variations in surgical procedure use in the United States. Arch Surg. 2011; 146(12): 1433–1440.
8.
SchwarzeMLShenYHemmerichJDaleW. Age-related trends in utilization and outcome of open and endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50(4): 722–729.
9.
KraissLWConteMSGearyRLKibbeMOzakiCK. Setting high-impact clinical research priorities for the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2013; 57(2): 493–500.
10.
CronenwettJLKraissLWCambriaRP. The society for vascular surgery vascular quality initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(5):1529–1537.
