Different endograft configurations (fenestrated, transrenal, infrarenal) may varyingly affect aortic side branch movement. Renal artery motion was evaluated with 64-slice dynamic cine-computed tomography angiography before and after endovascular aneurysm repair in 16 patients (46 renal arteries). Center-of-mass displacement of the renals was determined per heartbeat for before repair for 3 different endografts; differences were compared, with significance at P < 0.5. Preoperative renal artery motion is significant (1.2 [SD 0.5] mm, range, 0.6-2.). Neither transrenal nor infrarenal endografts alter renal artery motion compared with before repair (P < .05). Renal artery motion after fenestrated endovascular repair with renal stents reduces motion to 25% of the preoperative value (0.3 [SD, 0.1] mm, range, 0.2-0.5 mm; P = .01). Endograft implantation without stented side branches does not change renal artery motion, potentially allowing significant movement of the renal artery relative to the fenestration. Routine stenting of fenestrations limits postoperative renal artery motion to 0.3 mm, thereby preventing significant branch movement in relation the fenestration.
Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HDTransfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms . Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491-499.
2.
Prinssen M., Verhoeven EL, Buth J., et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607-1618.
3.
Prinssen M., Buskens E., Blankensteijn JD; DREAM trial participants. Quality of life endovascular and open AAA repair . Results of a randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg . 2004;27:121-127.
4.
Akkersdijk GJ , Prinssen M., Blankensteijn JDThe impact of endovascular treatment on in-hospital mortality following non-ruptured AAA repair over a decade: a population based study of 16,446 patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;28:41-46.
5.
Greenhalgh RM , Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG; EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364:843-848.
6.
Blankensteijn JD, de Jong SE, Prinssen M., et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:2398-2405.
7.
Fairman RM, Velazquez OC, Carpenter JP, et al. Midterm pivotal trial results of the Talent Low Profile System for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: analysis of complicated versus uncomplicated aortic necks. J Vasc Surg.2004;40:1074-1082.
8.
Arko FR, Filis KA, Seidel SA, et al. How many patients with infrarenal aneurysms are candidates for endovascular repair? The Northern California experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:33-40.
9.
Greenberg RK , Clair D., Srivastava S., et al. Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair? J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:990-996.
10.
Verhoeven EL , Zeebregts CJ, Kapma MR, Tielliu IF, Prins TR, van den Dungen JJFenestrated and branched endovascular techniques for thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair . J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2005;46:131-140.
11.
Verhoeven EL , Prins TR, Tielliu IF, et al. Treatment of short-necked infrarenal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated stent-grafts: short-term results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:477-483.
12.
Greenberg RK , Haulon S., Lyden SP, et al. Endovascular management of juxtarenal aneurysms with fenestrated endovascular grafting . J Vasc Surg . 2004;39:279-287.
Draney MT, Zarins CK, Taylor CAThree-dimensional analysis of renal artery bending motion during respiration . J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:380-386.
15.
Kaandorp DW , Vasbinder GB, de Haan MW, Kemerink GJ, van Engelshoven JMMotion of the proximal renal artery during the cardiac cycle. J Magn Reson Imaging . 2000; 12:924-928.
16.
Muhs BE, Teutelink A., Prokop M., Vincken KL, Moll FL, Verhagen HJEndovascular aneurysm repair alters renal artery movement: a preliminary evaluation using dynamic CTA. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:476-480.
17.
Haddad F., Greenberg RK, Walker E., et al. Fenestrated endovascular grafting: the renal side of the story . J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:181-190.
18.
Muhs BE, Verhoeven EL, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Mid-term results of branched and fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:9-15.
19.
Alric P., Hinchliffe RJ, Picot MC, et al. Long-term renal function following endovascular aneurysm repair with infrarenal and suprarenal aortic stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:397-405.
20.
Greenberg RK , Chuter TA, Lawrence-Brown M., Haulon S., Nolte L.; Zenith Investigators.Analysis of renal function after aneurysm repair with a device using suprarenal fixation (Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft) in contrast to open surgical repair . J Vasc Surg. 2004;39: 1219-1228.
21.
Lobato AC, Quick RC, Vaughn PL, Rodriguez-Lopez J., Douglas M., Diethrich EBTransrenal fixation of aortic endografts: intermediate follow-up of a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:273-278.
22.
Malina M., Lindh M., Ivancev K., Frennby B., Lindblad B., Brunkwall J.The effect of endovascular aortic stents placed across the renal arteries . Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;13: 207-213.
23.
Malina M., Brunkwall J., Ivancev K., Lindh M., Lindblad B., Risberg B.Renal arteries covered by aortic stents: clinical experience from endovascular grafting of aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14:109-113.
24.
Mehta M., Cayne N., Veith FJ, et al. Relationship of proximal fixation to renal dysfunction in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2004;45:367-374.
25.
Teutelink A. , Rutten A., Muhs BE, et al. Pilot study of dynamic cine CT angiography for the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for endograft treatment. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:139-144.
