Carotid Endarterectomy in Octogenarians with Symptomatic High-Grade Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Long-Term Clinical and Duplex Follow-up

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and duplex outcome after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in recently symptomatic patients aged 80 years or older. Information was assembled from a prospective data collection of all CEAs performed from January 1986 to December 1999. Included were all patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis who were aged 80 years or older at time of operation. Thirty-two patients, with a mean age of 82 years, were included. Outcome events were stroke, death, and restenosis (more than 50% diameter reduction) during routine duplex scan follow-up. Conventional surgical technique was used regarding anesthesia and selective shunting or patching. None of the operated-on patients suffered a stroke at any time during follow-up. One patient (3.1%) died in the early postoperative phase (< 30 days). An additional 8 patients died during follow-up. None of these deaths were of cerebrovascular origin. Survival at 3 years was 73% (life table analysis). Routine duplex scan follow-up showed 2 patients with a diameter reduction of more than 50%, both 3 months after CEA. Restenosis rate on duplex scan was 7.4% after 1 year. The authors conclude that there seems to be no reason to deny the very elderly the benefits of CEA. Stroke-free survival and survival rates show that carotid surgery is a safe procedure in patients aged 80 and over who are in apparently good health. These findings are supported by a low incidence of restenosis on duplex scan follow-up, indicating a durable repair.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group (ECST) : Randomized trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: Final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial. Lancet 351:1379-1387, 1999.

2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists' Collaborative Group : The final results of the NASCET trial. N Engl J Med 339:1415-1425, 1998.

3. Rothwell PM , Warlow CP , on behalf of the ECST: Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: A risk modelling study. Lancet 353:2105-2110, 1999.

4. Maxwell GJ , Taylor AJ , Maxwell BG , et al: Carotid endarterectomy in the community hospital in patients aged 80 and older. Ann Vasc Surg 231:781-788, 2000.

5. Schneider JR , Droste JS , Schindler N , et al: Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Comparison with patient characteristics and outcomes in younger patients. J Vasc Surg 31:927-935, 2000.

6. O'Hara PJ , Hertzer NR , Mascha EJ , et al: Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Early results and late outcome. J Vasc Surg 27:860-871, 1998.

7. Coyle KA , Smith RB III , Salam AA , et al: Carotid endarterectomy in the octogenarian. Ann Vasc Surg 8:417-420, 1994.

8. Favre JP , Guy JM , Frering V , et al: Carotid surgery in the octogenarian. Ann Vasc Surg 8:421-426, 1994.

9. Rosenthal D , Randal H , Jones DH , et al: Carotid endarterectomy in the octogenarian: Is it appropriate? J Vasc Surg 3:782-787, 1986.

10.

10. Alamowitch S , Eliasziw M , Algra A , et al, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group : Risk, causes, and prevention of ischemic stroke in elderly patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery disease. Lancet 357:1154-1160, 2001.

11.

11. Rothwell PM : Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of stroke in the very elderly. Lancet 357:1142-1143, 2001.

12.

12. Roth SM , Back MR , Bandyk DF , et al: A rational algorithm for duplex scan surveillance after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 30:453-460, 1990.

13.

13. Rutherford Vascular Surgery , ed. 5. Original University of Washington internal carotid artery stenosis grading criteria, pp 192-199.

14.

14. de Borst GJ , Moll FL , van de Pavoordt HDWM , et al: Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: When and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 21:484-489, 2001.

15.

15. Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics : Yearbook for Health Statistics, 2000, pp 60-61.

16.

16. Sander EACM , Hoeneveld H , Eikelboom BC , et al: Residual lesions and early recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 5:731-737, 1987.

17.

17. Ten Holter JBM , Ackerstaff RGA , Thoe Schwartzenberg GWS , et al: The impact of vein patch angioplasty on long-term surgical outcome after carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg 31:58-65, 1990.