Treatment of Varicose Veins: Proximal Saphenofemoral Ligation Comparing Adjunctive Varicose Phlebectomy with Sclerotherapy at a Military Medical Center

Abstract

There is no consensus as to the single best approach to the treatment of varicose veins. There has been a trend toward less invasive procedures to reduce the number of incisions and provide more selective ablation of varicosities. Ultimately, therapeutic decisions have depended on surgeon preference and the patient population. The active duty military population presents a unique challenge in the treatment of varicose veins. This mobile and active population requires a treatment method that provides maximum relief with the lowest possible morbidity and rapid recovery. The authors previously reported their experience with 104 patients who underwent saphenofemoral ligation combined with perforator point ligation and staged sclerotherapy. This group was compared to 103 patients who underwent saphenofemoral ligation, point perforator ligation, and stab avulsion phlebectomy as a single procedure. Follow-up for the sclerotherapy group included patient satisfaction surveys and documentation of recurrent varicosities. All ambulatory phlebectomy patients responded positively with respect to symptomatic and cosmetic results. Overall satisfaction was favorable and there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the ambulatory phlebectomy and sclerotherapy groups. Twelve per cent of the sclerotherapy patients developed true recurrences or new varicosities compared to 1 1% in the ambulatory phlebectomy group. The most common complication was superficial thrombophlebitis (20% ambulatory phlebectomy,16. sclerotherapy) which was mild in all cases. All but three patients in the ambulatory phlebectomy group returned to work within 7 days and 75% returned to full duty within 72 hours. Completion of therapy was accomplished in a much shorter period for the ambulatory phlebectomy group. Overall patient satisfaction was achieved for both ambulatory phlebectomy and sclerotherapy patients. Completion of therapy was achieved in a shorter period with fewer clinic visits in the ambulatory phlebectomy group and this has become our procedure of choice for active duty military patients.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. O'Leary DP , Chester JF , Jones SM : Management of varicose veins according to reason for presentation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:214-216,1996.

2. Bradbury A , Evans C , Allan P , et al: What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edinburgh vein study 58 cross-sectional population survey. Br Med J 318:353-356,1999.

3. Conrad P : Groin-to-knee downward stripping of the long saphenous vein. Phlebology 7:20-22,1992.

4. Baccaglini U , Spreafico G , Sorrentino P , et al: Outpatient surgery of varices of the lower limbs: Experience of 2568 cases at four universities. Int Angiol 14:397-399,1995.

5. Sarin S , Scurr JH , Coleridge Smith PD : Stripping of the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg 81:1455-1458,1994.

6. Sadick NS , Schanzer H : Combined high ligation and stab avulsion for varicose veins in an outpatient setting. Dermatol Surg 24:475-479,1998.

7. Schanzer H , Skladany M : Varicose vein surgery with preservation of the saphenous vein: A comparison between high ligation-avulsion versus saphenofemoral banding valvuloplasty-avulsion. J Vasc Surg 20:684-687,1994.

8. van der Stricht J , van Dale PI van Bellingen N , et al: Long-term results of associated surgery and sclerotherapy for primary varicose disease. In: Phlebology '85. Negus D , Jantet G (eds). London: John Libbey & Co,1985. pp 189-192.

9. Greason KL , Murray JD : Outpatient management of superficial venous insufficiency at a Naval medical facility. Ann Vasc Surg 10:524-529,1996.

10.

10. Neglen P , Einarsson E , Eklof B : High tie sclerotherapy for saphenous vein insufficiency. Phlebology 1:105-111,1986.

11.

11. Smith SR , Goldman MP : Tumescent anesthesia in ambulatory phlebectomy. Dermatol Surgery 24:453-561,1998.

12.

12. Munn SR , Morton JB , MacBeth WAAG , et al: To strip or not to strip the long saphenous vein? A varicose veins trial. Br J Surg 68:426-428,1981.

13.

13. Melliere D : Pourquoi et quand preserver les saphenes des malades variqueux pouvant servir a underneath pontage arteriel? J Mal Vasc (Paris) 19:216-221,1994.

14.

14. Rutherford RB , Sawyer JD , Jones DN : The fate of residual saphenous vein after partial removal or ligation. J Vasc Surg 12:422-428,1990.

15.

15. Friedell ML , Samson RH , Cohen MJ , et al: High ligation of the greater saphenous vein for treatment of lower extremity varicosities: The fate of the vein and therapeutic results. Ann Vasc Surg 6:5-8,1992.

16.

16. Fligelstone L , Carolan G , Pugh N , et al: An assessment of the long saphenous vein for potential use as a vascular conduit after varicose vein surgery. J Vasc Surg 18:836-840,1993.

17.

17. Hammarsten J , Pedersen P , Cederlund C-G , et al: Long saphenous saving surgery for varicose veins: A long-term follow-up. Eur J Vasc Surg 4:361-364,1990.