Despite the importance of STEM careers in nations’ development, they are not the preferred careers to study in Ecuador. Although the decision to pursue a STEM career has been analyzed, most studies use data from developed countries. This article analyzes the factors that characterize Ecuadorian STEM professionals using socioeconomic and demographic variables. Results show that women and individuals from households in the lowest quintile of per-capita income are less likely to have a STEM degree.
Arredondo TraperoF. G.Vázquez ParraJ. C.Velázquez SánchezL. M. (2019). STEM y brecha de género en Latinoamérica. Revista de El Colegio de San Luis, 9(18), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.21696/rcsl9182019947
2.
AvolioB.ChávezJ.Vílchez-RománC. (2020). Factors that contribute to the underrepresentation of women in science careers worldwide: A literature review. Social Psychology of Education, 23(3), 773–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09558-y
3.
Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). (2018). Las brechas de género en ciencia, tecnología e innovación en América Latina y el Caribe: resultados de una recolección piloto y propuesta. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Nota Técnica NºIDB-TN-1408. http://doi.org/10.18235/0001082
CarnevaleA. P.SmithN.MeltonM. (2011). STEM: Science technology engineering mathematics. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED525297
7.
ChesakS. S.CutshallS.AndersonA.PulosB.MoeschlerS.BhagraA. (2020). Burnout among women physicians: A call to action. Current Cardiology Reports, 22(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01300-6
García-HolgadoA.DíazA. C.García-PeñalvoF. J. (2019). Engaging women into STEM in Latin America: W-STEM project[Conference session]. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 232–239). https://doi.org/10.1145/3362789.3362902
14.
GarciaS. (2019). Trayectorias de mujeres: educación técnico-profesional y trabajo en el Ecuador, In serie Asuntos de Género, N° 156 (LC/TS.2019/28), Santiago, Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). https://hdl.handle.net/11362/44641
15.
GaylesJ. G.AmpawF. D. (2011). Gender matters: An examination of differential effects of the college experience on degree attainment in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.405
16.
HangoD.ZarifaD.Pizarro MilianR.SewardB. (2021). Roots and stems? Examining field of study choices among northern and rural youth in Canada. Studies in Higher Education, 46(3), 563–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1643308
17.
MoaklerM. W.KimM. M. (2014). College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. The Career Development Quarterly, 62(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.x
18.
MunozE. A.WeaverF. S. (1997). “Out of Place” Ecuadorian women in science and engineering programs. Latin American Perspectives, 24(4), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X9702400406
Producción. (2023). Proyectos Público Privados Gobierno Nacional – Ecuador Open for Business. https://www.appecuador.gob.ec/
21.
RittmayerA. D.BeierM. E. (2008). Overview: Self-efficacy in STEM. SWE-AWE CASEE Overviews, 1(3), 12.
22.
RoebuckD. B.SmithD. N.El HaddaouiT. (2017). Cross-generational perspectives on work-life balance and its impact on women's opportunities for leadership in the workplace. Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 33, 52–62. https://doi.org/10.21423/awlj-v33.a96
23.
SadlerP. M.SonnertG.HazariZ.TaiR. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
TobarL.GámezA. (2020). The gender gap broad the path for women in STEM [Conference session]. Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 187–192). https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436685
