Researchers interviewed higher education professionals, asking: How do professionals working in higher education equity and access sectors, both public and private, assign responsibility for improving access, and what solutions do they propose? Informed by Kingdon’s multiple streams framework and Guajardo et al.’s theory of change in action, researchers spoke with professionals to analyze inequities in college access. Respondents disagreed on responsibility for improving access, with solutions varying based on vantage points, values, and privilege.
AkunvabeyS. (2018). How can NYC public high schools collaborate with non-profit organizations to promote college access for Black and Latino youth? A case study evaluation of Sound Business Inc. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New York University, NY.
2.
AuerbachS. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 125–145.
3.
BersudskayaV.WeiC. C. (2011). Trends in student financing of undergraduate education: Selected years, 1995-96 to 2007-08. Web Tables. NCES 2011-218. National Center for Education Statistics.
4.
BondN. (2019). Effective legislative advocacy: Policy experts’ advice for educators. The Educational Forum, 83(1), 75–89.
5.
BoundJ.TurnerS. (2002). Going to war and going to college: Did World War II and the G.I. Bill increase educational attainment for returning veterans?Journal of Labor Economics, 20(4), 784–815.
6.
CarnevaleA. P.FasulesM. L. (2017). Latino education and economic progress: Running faster but still behind. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://cew.georgetown.edu/cew-reports/latinosworkforce/
7.
CahalanM.PernaL.YamashitaM.RuizR.FranklinK. (2016). Indicators of higher education equity in the United States: 2016 Historical Trend Report. Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.
8.
CrowD. A. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs, issue experts, and water rights policy change in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 27(3), 299–315.
9.
DynarskiS. (2003). Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. American Economic Review, 93(1), 279–288.
10.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. Future of Children, 23(1), 67–91.
11.
FloresS. M.ShepherdJ. C. (2014). Pricing out the disadvantaged? The effect of tuition deregulation in Texas public four-year institutions. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 99–122.
12.
GreenT. C. (2005). Financial aid, access, and America’s social contract with higher education. College & University, 80(3), 9–13.
13.
GuajardoM. A.GuajardoF.JansonC.MilitelloM. (2015). Reframing community partnerships in education: Uniting the power of place and wisdom of people. Routledge.
HurshD. W. (2016). The end of public schools: The corporate reform agenda to privatize education. Routledge.
16.
KennamerM. K.KatsinasS. G.HardyD. E.RoesslerB. (2010). Closing doors of opportunity? Trends in enrollment, college costs, and direct grant aid at community colleges in the United States, 2000-2001 to 2005-2006. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 34(1–2), 7–24.
17.
KingdonJ. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers.
Lund-ChaixA.GellesE. (2014). A cultural capital perspective of the effect of a government-voluntary sector partnership for enhancing access to postsecondary education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(3), 436–454.
22.
MalinJ. R.LubienskiC. (2013). Whose opinions count in educational policymaking?Current Issues in Education, 16(2), 1–12.
23.
McKeown-MoakM. P. (2013). The “New” performance funding in higher education. Educational Considerations, 40(2), 1–10.
24.
McSwainC.CunninghamA.KeselmanY.MerisotisJ. (2005). Private scholarships count: Access to higher education and the critical role of the private sector. Institute for Higher Education Policy.
25.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.
Musu-GilletteL.RobinsonJ.McFarlandJ.KewalRamaniA.ZhangA.Wilkinson-FlickerS. (2016). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2016 (NCES 2016-007). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education. Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
28.
ParedesR. A. (2019, February). The State of Latino Education Texas Association of Chicanos in Higher Education. Presentation at the 44 Annual Conference of Texas Association of Chicanos in Higher Education.
29.
RineP. J. (2016). A shell game by any other name: The economics and rationale behind tuition discounting. jCENTER for Innovative Higher Education. www.cehd.umn.edu/OLPD/PCLN/Rine-WhitePaper.pdf
30.
SantosJ. L.SáenzV. B. (2014). In the eye of the perfect storm: The convergence of policy and Latina/o trends in access and financial concerns, 1975-2008. Educational Policy, 28(3), 393–424.
