This article presents a synthesized historiography of higher education in American prisons, exploring interactions of federal, state, and institution-level policies within six specific states: California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New York, and Texas. We define considerations for researchers, policymakers, and advocates regarding efforts to sustain educational access for incarcerated students. Findings suggest access is inextricably linked to policies relying on the social construction of crime and incarceration. As such, sole reliance on federal support may be detrimental for programs. A focus on diversifying funding sources will likely better ensure the long-term durability of support for higher education in prison programming.
Alliance for Higher Education in Prison. (2023). National directory of HEP. Alliance for Higher Education in Prison. https://www.nationaldirectoryhep.org/
3.
AndrewsD. A.BontaJ. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018362
4.
ApplebyA. M. (2023). The history and operation of prison education programs today. In ConyersA.LynnV.LeigeyM. (Eds.), Mass incarceration in the 21st century: Realities and reflections (pp. 107–116). Routledge.
5.
Atkin-PlunkC. A.SloasL. B. (2019). Support for balanced justice and rehabilitation for justice-involved veterans. Criminal Justice Review, 44(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016818793698
BoyceA. (2019). A re-imagining of evaluation as social justice: A discussion of the Education Justice Project. Critical Education, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v10i1.186323
9.
BrewerD. D. (1970, November). A study of adult and juvenile correctional institutions in the state of Mississippi conducted for the Penal Institutions Legislative Committee (Report to the Joint Committee of the Mississippi Legislature).
10.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1992). Census of state and federal correctional facilities. Government Printing Office.
CarnavaleA. P.MabelZ.CampbellK. P. (2023). Race-conscious affirmative action: What’s next. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED627999.pdf
14.
ChaseL. J.DickoverR. (1983). University education at Folsom Prison: An evaluation. Journal of Correctional Education, 34(3), 92–95. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41971191
15.
ConwayP. F. (2022). Talking past each other: The debate over college-level prison education as represented in New York print media, 2013-2020. Sociological Forum, 37(4), 1160–1181. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12861
16.
ConwayP. F. (2023). Beyond recidivism: Exploring formerly incarcerated student perspectives on the value of higher education in prison. The Review of Higher Education, 46(4), 453–483. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.0187
CoyneC. M. (2019). 50 years and counting: The higher education act of 1965. Journal of Higher Education Management, 34(1), 23–34.
20.
CrowH. L. (1964). A political history of the Texas penal system, 1829-1951 (Publication No. 6411788) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
21.
DavisL.BozickR.SteeleJ.SaundersJ.MilesJ. (2013). Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional education. RAND. https://doi.org/10.7249/rr266
EnnsP. K. (2014). The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12098
24.
EnnsP. K. (2016). Incarceration nation: How the United States became the most punitive democracy in the world. Cambridge University Press.
FranklinH. B. (1979). Rehabilitating prison education. Change, 11(8), 18–21.
28.
GándaraD.JonesS. (2020). Who deserves benefits of higher education? A policy discourse analysis of a process surrounding reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. The Review of Higher Education, 44(1), 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0037
29.
GehringT. (1997). Post-secondary education for inmates: An historical inquiry. Journal of Correctional Education, 48(2), 46–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23294132
30.
GouldM. R.SpearIt. (2014). Twenty years after the education apocalypse: The ongoing fallout from the 1994 omnibus crime bill. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 33(2), 283–301. https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr/vol33/iss2/4/
HammondJ. C. (2012). Slavery, settlement, and empire: The expansion and growth of slavery in the interior of the North American continent, 1770-1820. Journal of the Early Republic, 32(2), 175–206.
33.
HeitzegN. (2009). Education or incarceration: Zero tolerance policies and the school to prison pipeline. Forum on Public Policy, 9(2), 1–21.
JacobsA.WeissmanM. (2019). Mapping the landscape of higher education in New York state prisons. John Jay College of Criminal Justice Prisoner Reentry Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED594766.pdf
McLaughlinM.Pettus-DavisC.BrownD.VeehC.RennT. (2016). The economic burden of incarceration in the U.S. Institute for Advancing Justice Research and Innovation, Washington University in St. Louis.
Mississippi Department of Archives and History. (n.d.). Mississippi State Penitentiary (Parchman) photo collections. https://da.mdah.ms.gov/series/parchman
MontenegroD. A. (2021). Reaching at-risk student populations during a pandemic: The impacts of COVID-19 on prison education. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.604963
45.
NatowR. S.ReddyV.IoannouV. (2023). State-level responses to U.S. federal policy on state authorization for higher education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7522
46.
NorwegE. L. (2023). Mass(achusetts) incarceration and higher education: The deep origins and contested history of college behind bars in the Bay State [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/122/78
47.
NovakA. (2019). The school-to-prison pipeline: An examination of the association between suspension and justice system involvement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(8), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819846917
RhoadesG. (2023). Markets, states, and higher education: Trends in academic capitalism. In BastedoM. N.AltbachP. G.GumportP. (Eds.), American higher education in the 21st century: Social, political, and economic challenges (5th ed., pp. 506–532). Johns Hopkins University Press.
52.
RobinsonG.EnglishE. (2017). The second chance Pell Pilot program: A historical overview. American Enterprise Institute.
53.
RoseC.NyreG. F. (1979). Inmate and ex-offender postsecondary education programs in California. California Postsecondary Education Commission. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED175347
54.
RyanT. A.WoodardJ. C. (1987, July). Correctional education: A state of the art analysis. National Institute of Corrections [NIC].
SchermerhornC. (2015). The business of slavery and the rise of American capitalism, 1815–1860. Yale University Press.
57.
SchneiderA. L.IngramH.DeleonP. (2014). Democratic policy design: Social construction of target populations. In SabatierP. A.WeibleC. M. (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 105–150). Westview Press.
58.
SchragZ. M. (2021). The Princeton guide to historical research. Princeton University Press.
59.
SchuddeL.RyuW. (2023) Extending opportunity, perpetuating privilege: Institutional stratification & educational expansion. In BastedoM. N.AltbachP. G.GumportP. (Eds.), American higher education in the 21st century: Social, political, and economic challenges (5th ed., pp. 343–369). Johns Hopkins University Press.
60.
SeashoreM. J.HaberfeldS. (1976). Prisoner education: Project Newgate and other college programs. Praeger.
61.
SkibaR. J.ArredondoM. I.WilliamsN. T. (2014). More than a metaphor: The contribution of exclusionary discipline to a school-to-prison pipeline. Equity and Excellence in Education, 47(4), 546–564.
S.B. 1391. California Legislature 2016. (Calif. 2016).
65.
TewksburyR. A.TaylorJ. M. (1996). The consequences of eliminating Pell Grant eligibility for students in post-secondary education programs. Federal Probation, 60, 60–63.
ThelinJ. R. (2019). A history of American higher education (3rd ed.). John Hopkins University Press.
68.
UbahC. B. (2004). Abolition of Pell Grants for higher education of prisoners: Examining antecedents and consequences. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v39n02_05
WardT. (2021, January28). Advocates call on New York state to restore tuition assistance program for incarcerated students after Pell Victory in congress. Turn on the TAP. https://bpi.bard.edu/turnonthetap/
WrightM. C. (2001). Pell Grants, politics and the penitentiary: Connections between the development of U.S. higher education and prisoner post-secondary programs. Journal of Correctional Education, 52(1), 11–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23294027
76.
YettickH. (2015). One small droplet: News media coverage of peer-reviewed and university-based education research and academic expertise. Educational Researcher, 44(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15574903
77.
ZookJ. (1994). Ban on Pell Grants to inmates crushes prison-education efforts. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 41(11), A32–A34.
