This qualitative, phenomenological research study explored how 17 Latina undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors developed their STEM identities. The study focused on the role that self- and outside recognition as a STEM individual played in the process. Interviews revealed students’ self-recognition in many forms. Outside recognition came primarily from STEM peers, faculty members, and family members. Self- and outside recognition were often negotiated through the lens of intersectional identities held by the participants.
AschbacherP. R.LiE.RothE. J. (2009). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation, and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 564-582.
2.
BrickhouseN. W.LoweryP.SchultzK. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441-458.
3.
BurkeP. J.StetsJ. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
CarloneH. B.JohnsonA. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187-1218. doi:10.1002/tea.20237
5.
ChreimS.WilliamsB.HiningsC. (2007). Interlevel influences on the reconstruction of professional role identity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1515-1539.
6.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
DuttonJ.RobertsL. M.BednarJ. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review, 35, 265-293.
10.
Excelencia in Education. (2015). The condition of Latinos in education: 2015 Factbook. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
GiguetteM. S.LopezA. M.JrSchulteL. J. (2006, October). Perceived social support: Ethnic and gender differences in the computing disciplines. Paper presented at 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Session S1G: Student Perceptions of Engineering and Careers, University of New Orleans, LA.
GodwinA.PotvinG.HazariZ. (2014, June). Do engineers beget engineers? Exploring connections between the engineering-related career choices of students and their families. Paper presented at American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN.
14.
HazariZ.SadlerP. M.SonnertG. (2013). The science identity of college students: A gender and race/ethnicity comparison. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82-91.
15.
HollandD. C.LachiocotteW.SkinnerD.CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
HusserlE. (1931). Ideas (Boyce GibsonW. R., Trans.). London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
17.
JohnsonD. R. (2011). Women of color in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). New Directions for Institutional Research, 152, 75-85.
18.
LaveJ. (1992, April). Learning as participation in communities of practice. Paper presented at the American Education Researchers Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.
19.
LaveJ. (1998). The culture of acquisition and the practice of understanding. In KirshnerD.WhitsonJ. A. (Eds.), Situated cognition (pp. 17-36). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LeslieL. L.McClureG. T.OaxacaR. L. (1998). Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 69, 239-276.
22.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
23.
MalcomS. M.HallP. Q.BrownJ. W. (1976). The double bind: The price of being a minority woman in science. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
24.
Miles MatthewB.HubermanM. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
National Science Foundation (2017). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics: Arlington, VA. Retrieved from www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
27.
OngM.WrightC.EspinosaL. L.OrfieldG. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172-208.
28.
PackerM. J.GoicoecheaJ. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35, 227-241.
29.
RendónL. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Toward a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19, 33-51.
30.
SolorzanoD. G.Delgado BernalD. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and Latcrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308-342.
31.
SorgeC.NewsonH. E.HagertyJ. J. (2000). Fun is not enough: Attitudes of Hispanic middle school students toward science and scientists. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22, 332-345.
32.
StetsJ. E.BurkeP. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224-237.
33.
StevensT.OlivarezA.LanW. Y.Tallent-RunnelsM. K. (2004). Role of mathematics, self-efficacy and motivation in mathematics performance across ethicicty. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 208-221.
34.
StrayhornT. L. (2010). The role of schools, families, and psychological variables on math achievement of Black high school students. High School Journal, 93, 177-194.
35.
TonsoK. L. (1999). Engineering gender-gendering engineering: A cultural model for belonging. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 5, 365-405.
36.
TonsoK. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 1, 273-307.
37.
WegnerE. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
YossoT. (2000). A critical race and LatCrit approach to media literacy: Chicana/o resistance to visual microagressions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
