Using the framework of physical campus ecology and socio-academic integration moments theory, the researcher sought to identify physical university spaces that successful Latina/o transfer students turned to as sites of positive socio-academic integration. Findings revealed that students developed a keen spatial awareness of comfort spaces where they selectively engaged in moments of socio-academic, nonsocial, and nonacademic integration. This study is important to understand students’ perceptions about educational environments and whether universities can provide safe spaces for Latina/os.
AbregoL. J. (2006). I can’t go to college because I don’t have papers: Incorporation patterns of Latino undocumented youth. Latino Studies, 4, 212-231.
AndradeL. M.Hoppe NagaoA.MedranoE.LoweJ. M.CurrieD.-J. (2015). Applying organizational leadership theory to evaluate a community college orientation and preparation program with predominantly Latino/a students: Qualitative interviews in a service-learning project. SAGE Research Methods Cases. doi:10.4135/978144627305014554890
BairdL. L. (1976). Structuring the environment to improve outcomes. In LenningO. T. (Ed.), New directions for higher education: Improving educational outcomes (pp. 1-23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BanningJ. H. (Ed.). (1978). Campus ecology: A perspective for student affairs. Cincinnati, OH: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators,
7.
BanningJ. H. (1984). Retention: An ecological perspective. The Campus Ecologist, 2(2), 1-3.
8.
BanningJ. H. (1989a). Ecotherapy: A life space application of the ecological perspective. The Campus Ecologist, 7(3), 1-3.
9.
BanningJ. H. (1989b). Environmental scanning: A tool for campus ecologist. The Campus Ecologist, 7(4), 1-3.
10.
BanningJ. H. (1989c). Impact of college environments on freshman students. In UpcraftM. L.GardnerJ. N. (Eds.), The freshman year experience (pp. 53-63). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
BanningJ. H. (1991). Student affairs: Are we helping in the search for community?The Campus Ecologist, 9(2), 1-2.
BanningJ. H. (1995b). Environmental scanning: Application to college and university housing. The Journal of College and University Student Housing, 25, 30-34.
16.
BanningJ. H. (2000). Brick and mortarboards: How student union buildings learn and teach. College Services Administration, 23(3), 16-19.
17.
BanningJ. H.BrynerC. (2001). A framework for organizing the scholarship of campus ecology. Journal of Student Affairs, 10, 9-20.
18.
BanningJ. H.ClemonsS.McKelfreshD.GibbsR. W. (2010). Special places for students: Third place and restorative place. College Student Journal, 44, 906-912.
19.
BanningJ. H.LunaF. C. (1992). Viewing the campus ecology for messages about Hispanic/Latino culture. The Campus Ecologist, 10(4), 1-6.
20.
BanningJ. H.MiddletonV.DenistonT. L. (2008). Using photographs to assess equity climate: A taxonomy. Multicultural Perspectives, 10, 41-46. doi:10.1080/15210960701869611
21.
BloorM. (1997). Addressing social problems through qualitative research. In SilvermanD. (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (pp. 221-238). London, England: SAGE.
BorregoS. E. (2006). Mapping the learning environment. In KeelingR. P. (Ed.), Learning reconsidered 2: A practical guide to implementing a campus-wide focus on the student experience (1st ed., pp. 11-16). Washington, DC: ACPA, ACUHOI, ACUI, NACA, NACADA, NASPA, and NIRSA.
24.
BridgerL. (2013). Seeing and telling households: A case for photographic elicitation and graphic elicitation in qualitative research. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 10, 132-151.
25.
Camacho LiuM. (2011, July). Investing in higher education for Latinos: Trends in Latino college access and success. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/documents/educ/trendsinlatinosuccess.pdf
26.
CastellanosJ.GloriaA. M. (2007). Research considerations and theoretical application for best practices in higher education: Latina/os achieving success. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 378-396. doi:10.1177/1538192707305347
27.
ClemonsS. A.McKelfreshD.BanningJ. (2005). Importance of sense of place and sense of self in residence hall design: A qualitative study of first-year students. Journal of the First-Year Experience, 17, 73-86.
28.
ConyneR. K.BanningJ. H.ClarkR. J.CorazziniJ.HuebnerL.KeatingL.WrennR. (1979). The campus environment as client: A new direction for college counselors. Journal of College Student Personnel, 20, 437-442.
29.
CreswellJ. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
CrispG.NoraA. (2010). Hispanic student success: Factors influencing the persistence and transfer decisions of Latino community college students enrolled in developmental education. Research in Higher Education, 51, 175-194.
32.
DealT.PetersonK. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Deil-AmenR. (2011). Socio-academic integrative moments: Rethinking academic and social integration among two-year college students in career-related programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 55-91.
34.
DouglasK. B. (1997, November). Impressions: How first-year, African American students pictured a research university. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Albuquerque, NM.
35.
DouglasK. B. (1998, November). Seeing as well as hearing: Responses to the use of an alternative form of data representation in a study of students’ environmental perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, FL.
36.
EarthmanG. I.LemastersL. (2011). The influence of school building conditions on students and teachers: A theory-based research program (1993-2011). The ACEF Journal, 1, 15-36.
37.
FernándezL. (2002). Telling stories about school: Using critical race and Latino critical theories to document Latina/Latino education and resistance. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(45), 45-65.
38.
FloresL. Y.OjedaL.HuangY. P.GeeD.LeeS. (2006). The relation of acculturation, problem-solving appraisal, and career decision-making self-efficacy to Mexican American high school students’ educational goals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 260-266.
GloriaA. M.CastellanosJ.OrozcoV. (2005). Perceived educational barriers, cultural fit, coping responses, and psychological well-being of Latina undergraduates. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27, 161-183.
44.
GloriaA. M.RodriguezE. R. (2000). Counseling Latino university students: Psychosociocultural issues for consideration. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78, 145-154.
45.
HarperD. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photographic elicitation. Visual Studies, 17, 13-26.
HillJ. (2013). Using participatory and visual methods to address power and identity in research with young people. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 10, 106-131.
48.
KenneyD. R.DumontR.KenneyG. (2005). Mission and place: Strengthening learning and community through campus design. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
KuhG. D.SchuhJ. H. (1991). The ecology of involving colleges. The Campus Ecologist, 9(4), 1-3.
51.
MarreroF. A. (2016). Barriers to school success for Latino students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5, 180-186.
52.
MarshallC. B.RossmanG. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
53.
McCarthyL. J. (2013). “It’s coming from the heart”: Exploring a student’s experiences of “home” using participatory visual methodologies. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 10, 76-105.
54.
NoraA.CrispG. (2009). Hispanics in higher education: An overview of research, theory, and practice. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory of research (pp. 317-353). New York, NY: Springer.
55.
O’NeillD.OatesA. (2001). The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate in Central Texas middle schools. Educational Facility Planner, 36(3), 14-22.
OwenW. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287.
58.
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59.
ReinardJ. C. (2008). Introduction to communication research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
60.
RendónL. I. (1994). Validating culturally diverse students: Towards a new model of learning and student development. Innovative Higher Education, 19, 33-50.
61.
RendónL. I.MuñozS. M. (2011). Revisiting validation theory: Theoretical foundations, applications, and extensions. Enrollment Management Journal: Student Access, Finance, and Success in Higher Education, 5(2), 12-33.
62.
RobinsonN. (2013). Picturing social inclusion: Photography and identity in Downtown Eastside Vancouver. Graduate Journal of Social Science, 10, 20-42.
63.
SternG. G. (1970). People in context: Measuring person-environment congruence in education and industry. New York, NY: John Wiley.
TempleP.BatchelorD. (2008, June). Space and place in the university. Lecture presented at Exploring the Hinterlands: Mapping an Agenda for Institutional Research in the UK, Southampton Solent University, Southampton, UK.
66.
TempleP. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6, 229-241. doi: 10.1080/14748460802489363
TorresV. (2003). Influences on ethnic identity development of Latino students in the first two years of college. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 532-547.
69.
TorresV. (2006). A mixed method study testing data-model fit of a retention model for Latino/students at urban universities. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 299-318. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0037
70.
TownsendB. K.WilsonK. (2006). “A hand hold for a little bit”: Factors facilitating the success of community college transfer students to a large research university. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 439-456. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0052
71.
ValenciaR. R.BlackM. S. (2002). “Mexican Americans don’t value education!” On the basis of the myth, mythmaking, and debunking. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1, 81-103.
72.
WalshW. B. (1978). Person/environment interaction. In BanningJ. H. (Ed.), Campus ecology: A perspective for student affairs (pp. 6-16). Cincinnati, OH: National Association Student Personnel Administrators.
73.
WawrzynskiM. R.SedlacekW. E. (2003). Race and gender differences in the transfer student experience. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 489-501.
74.
WaxmanL.ClemonsS.BanningJ.McKelfreshD. (2007). The library as place: Providing students with opportunities for socialization, relaxation, and restoration. New Library World, 108, 424-434. doi: 10.1108/03074800710823953
75.
WestberryN.McNaughtonS.BillotJ.GaetaH. (2013). Lost in space: Physically, virtually, and pedagogically. In FrielickS.Buissink-SmithN.WyseP.BillotJ.HallasJ.WhiteheadE. (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: The place of learning and teaching (pp. 502-513). Milperra, New South Wales: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
76.
WilliamsT. E. (1986). Optimizing student institutional fit: An interactive perspective. College and University, 61, 141-152.
77.
WittP. H.HandalP. J. (1984). Person-environment fit: Is satisfaction predicted by congruency, environment, or personality?Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 503-508.
