Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) enroll the majority of Latina/o students in higher education; however, it is unclear how HSIs influence Latina/os’ postsecondary experiences. In this study, we examined how the Latina/o student experience differed between students who did and did not attend 4-year HSIs. The results suggest that HSIs generally have positive, but modest, effects on Latina/o’s student engagement and self-perceived gains. The differences were more pronounced for first-year students than seniors.
AllisonP. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
AnayaG. (1999). College impact on student learning: Comparing the use of self-reported gains, standardized test scores, and college grades. Research in Higher Education, 40, 499-526.
3.
AranaR.Castañeda-SoundC.BlanchardS.AguilarT. E. (2011). Indicators of persistence for Hispanic undergraduate achievement: Toward an ecological model. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10, 237-251.
4.
AstinA. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
5.
AstinA. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
6.
BlinderA. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8, 436-455.
CerezoA.ChangT. (2013). Latina/o achievement at predominantly White universities: The importance of culture and ethnic community. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12, 72-85.
9.
CuellarM. (2014). The impact of Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs), emerging HSIs, and non-HSIs on Latina/o academic self-concept. The Review of Higher Education, 37, 499-530.
10.
DaytonB.Gonzalez-VasquezN.MartinezC. R.PlumC. (2004). Hispanic-serving institutions through the eyes of students and administrators. New Directions for Student Services, 105, 29-40.
FloresS. M.ParkT. J. (2013). Race, ethnicity, and college success: Examining the continued significance of the minority-serving institution. Educational Researcher, 42, 115-128.
13.
FloresS. M.ParkT. J. (2015). The effect of enrolling in a minority-serving institution for Black and Hispanic students in Texas. Research in Higher Education, 56, 247-276.
14.
GarciaG. A. (2013). Does percentage of Latinas/os affect graduation rates at 4-year Hispanic serving institutions (HSIs), emerging HSIs, and Non-HSIs?Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12, 256-268.
15.
GarciaG. A. (2015). Culturally relevant practices that “serve” students at a Hispanic serving institution. Innovative Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9318-7
16.
HarperS. R.QuayeS. J. (2015). Making engagement equitable for students in U.S. higher education. In QuayeS. J.HarperS. R. (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (2nd ed., pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
HubbardS. M.StageF. K. (2009). Attitudes, perceptions, and preferences of faculty at Hispanic serving and predominantly black institutions. Journal of Higher Education, 80, 270-289.
20.
HurtadoS.CuellarM.Guillermo-WannC. (2011). Quantitative measures of students’ sense of validation: Advancing the study of diverse learning environments. Enrollment Management Journal, Summer 2011, 53-71. Retrieved from http://www.tgslc.org/emj/summer2011.cfm.
21.
JannB. (2008). The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal, 8, 453-749.
22.
KuhG. D. (2000). Understanding campus environments. In BarrM. J.DeslerM. K., & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of student affairs administration (2nd ed., pp. 50-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
KuhG. D.SchuhJ. H.WhittE. J. & Associates. (1991). Involving colleges: Successful approaches to fostering student learning and development outside the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
LadenB. V. (2001). Hispanic-serving institutions: Myths and realities. Peabody Journal of Education, 76, 73-92.
25.
LadenB. V. (2004). Hispanic-serving institutions: What are they? Where are they?Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(3), 181-198.
26.
LiX. (2007). Characteristics of minority-serving institutions and minority undergraduates enrolled in these institutions (NCES 2008-156). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27.
MaestasR.VaqueraG. S.Muñoz ZehrL. (2007). Factors impacting sense of belonging at a Hispanic-serving institution. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 6, 237-256.
28.
MusobaG. D.CollazoC.PlacideS. (2013). The first year: Just surviving or thriving at an HSI. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12, 356-368.
29.
National Survey of Student Engagement. (2014). NSSE 2013: Conceptual framework and validity. Unpublished manuscript.
30.
Nelson LairdT. F.BridgesB. K.Morelon-QuainooC. L.WilliamsJ. M.Salinas HolmesM. (2007). African American and Hispanic student engagement at minority serving and predominantly white institutions. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 39-56.
31.
NúñezA. M.BowersA. J. (2011). Exploring what leads high school students to enroll in Hispanic-serving institutions: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 1286-1313.
32.
OaxacaR. (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14, 693-709.
33.
PaceC. R. (1984). Measuring the quality of college student experiences: An account of the development and use of the College Student Experiences Questionnaire. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
34.
QuayeS. J.GriffenK. A.MuseusS. D. (2015). Engaging students of color. In QuayeS. J.HarperS. R. (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (2nd ed., pp. 15-36). New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
RainesR. T. (1998). Collaboration and cooperation among minority serving institutions. New Directions in Higher Education, 102, 69-80.
36.
RocconiL. M.GonyeaR. M. (2015, May). Contextualizing student engagement effect sizes: An empirical analysis. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum, Denver, CO.
37.
SmartJ. C.FeldmanK. A.EthingtonC. A. (2000). Academic disciplines: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
38.
TorresV. (2006). A mixed method study testing data-model fit of a retention model for Latino/a students at urban universities. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 299-318.
39.
van BuurenS. (2007). Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 219-242.
40.
Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education. (2012). Knocking at the college door: Projections of high school graduates (8th ed.). Boulder, CO: Author.
41.
YuL. M.BurtonA.Rivero-AriasO. (2007). Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 16, 243-258.
42.
YunM.-S. (2005). A simple solution to the identification problem in detailed wage decompositions. Economic Inquiry, 43, 766-772.
