This study uses narrative analysis to understand the ways in which Mexican university faculty members used their self-motivational resources to persist in an instructional technology training program within adverse work conditions. The methodology included interviews and participant observation. Findings suggest that faculty’s academic resilience was based on faculty’s self-definition as permanent learners and innovators, the perception of instruction as a field of reflection-in-action and systematization, and the caring instructional approach used by training instructors.
AdamyP. H.HeineckeW. (2005). The influence of organizational culture on technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 233-255.
2.
ÁlvarezA. E.BozaA. O.HernándezC. Z.LópezE. B.ContrerasM. Y. G.TovarN. T. (2003). Estudio sobre el uso de las tecnologías de comunicación e información para la virtualización de la educación superior en México [An examination on the use of information and communication technology for the virtualization of higher education in Mexico]. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto Internacional para la Educación Superior en América, Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior.
3.
AssafL. C. (2008). Professional identity of a reading teacher: Responding to high-stakes testing pressures. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14, 239-252.
4.
BessJ. L. (1998). Contract systems, bureaucracies, and faculty motivation: The probable effects of a non-tenure policy. The Journal of Higher Education, 69, 1-22.
5.
BlockerL. S.CopelandE. P. (1994). Determinants of resilience in high-stressed youth. The High School Journal, 77, 286-293.
6.
BondyE.McKenzieJ. (1999). Resilience building and social reconstructionist teaching: A first-year teacher’s story. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 129-150.
7.
BormanG. D.OvermanL. T. (2004). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 177-195.
8.
BrunnerJ. J. (1989). La educacion superior y la formación profesional en América Latina. [Higher education and profesionalization in Latin America]. Revista Mexicana de Sociología, 51, 237-249.
9.
BurgessR. (1984). In the field: An introduction to field research. London: George Allen and Unwin.
10.
CameronD. (1999). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In JaworskiA.CouplandN. (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 419-432). New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
EastmondD. (2000). Realizing the promise of distance education in low technology countries. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(2), 99-111.
13.
EcclesJ. S.WigfieldA. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
14.
Economic Commission for Latin America. (2005). Public policies for the development of information societies in Latin America and the Caribbean (No. LC/W.19). Santiago de Chile: Author.
15.
FineG. A. (1996). Justifying work: Occupational rhetorics as resources in restaurant kitchens. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 90-115.
16.
GreenhalghS. (2002). Under the medical gaze: Facts and fictions of chronic pain. Berkeley: The University of California.
17.
HansonJ. (2009). Displaced but not replaced: The impact of e-learning on academic identities in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 553-564.
18.
HendersonN.MilsteinM. (1996). Resiliency in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
19.
Houser-MarkoL.SheldonK. M. (2006). Motivating behavioral persistence: The self-as-doer construct. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1037-1049.
20.
JacobsJ. A.WinslowS. E. (2004). Overworked faculty: Job stresses and family demands. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596, 104-129.
21.
JarrettR. L. (1997). Resilience among low-income African American youth: An ethnographic perspective. Ethos, 25, 218-229.
22.
KentR. (1993). Higher education in Mexico: From unregulated expansion to evaluation. Higher Education, 25, 73-83.
23.
KleinmanS. (1981). Making professionals into persons: Discrepancies in traditional and humanistic expectations of professional identity. Work and Occupations, 8, 61-87.
24.
LabovW. (1999). The transformation of experience in narrative. In JaworskiA.CouplandN. (Eds.), The discourse reader (2nd ed., pp. 214-226). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
López-GuerraS.Flores-ChávezM. (2006). Las reformas educativas neoliberales en Latinoamérica [Neoliberal educational reforms in Latin America]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 8(1), 2-14.
26.
LutharS. S.CicchettiD.BeckerB. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543-562.
27.
McKeonJ.GillhamJ.BersaniC. (1981). Professional identity and interaction: The case of a juvenile court. Work and Occupations, 8, 353-380.
28.
McMillanJ. H.ReedD. F. (1994). At-risk students and resiliency: Factors contributing to academic success. Clearing House, 67, 137-140.
29.
MuirheadB. (2005). A Canadian perspective on the uncertain future of distance education. Distance Education, 26, 239-254.
30.
NeumannY.Finaly-NeumannE. (1990). The support-stress paradigm and faculty research publication. The Journal of Higher Education, 61, 565-580.
OlsenD. (1993). Work satisfaction and stress in the first and third year of academic appointment. The Journal of Higher Education, 64, 453-471.
33.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2006). OECD thematic review of tertiary education: Country background report for Mexico. Mexico City: Ministry of Education in Mexico.
34.
Orozco-SilvaL. E. (1996). Transformation dynamics for higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Higher Education Policy, 9, 67-74.
35.
PeresJ. F.Moreira-AlmeidaA.NaselloA. G.KoenigH. G. (2007). Spirituality and resilience in trauma victims. Journal of Religion & Health, 46, 343-350.
36.
Pérez-JácomeD. (2012). Agenda digital.mx. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaria de Comunicaciones y Transportes.
37.
PerlbergA.KeinanG. (1986). Sources of stress in academe: The Israeli case. Higher Education, 15, 73-88.
38.
PrattM. G.RockmannK. W.KaufmannJ. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 235-262.
39.
RapleyT. J. (2001). The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analyzing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1, 303-323.
40.
RiessmanC. (2002). Analysis of personal narratives. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 695-710). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
RutterM. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316-331.
42.
SagorR. (1996). Building resiliency in students. Educational Leadership, 54(1), 38-43.
43.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
ShihM. (2004). Positive stigma: Examining resilience and empowerment in overcoming stigma. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 175-185.
46.
SESIC, Subsecretaría de Educación Superior e Investigación Científica (2003). Informe nacional sobre la educación superior en México [National report on higher eductaion in Mexico]. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaria de Educación Superior.
47.
SlaughterS.RhoadesG. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
StromquistN. P. (2002). Education in a globalized world: The connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
49.
SutzJ. (2003). Inequality and university research agendas in Latin America. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28, 52-68.
50.
TabataL. N.JohnsrudL. K. (2008). The impact of faculty attitudes toward technology, distance education, and innovation. Research in Higher Education, 49, 625-646.
51.
ThamC. M.WernerJ. M. (2005). Designing and evaluating e-learning in higher education: A review and recommendations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(2), 15-25.
52.
ThompsonC. J.DeyE. L. (1998). Pushed to the margins: Sources of stress for African American college and university faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 69, 324-345.
53.
ThorsenE. J. (1996). Stress in academe: What bothers professors?Higher Education, 31, 471-489.
54.
TienF. F.BlackburnR. T. (1996). Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 2-22.
55.
TorresC. A.SchugurenskyD. (2002). The political economy of higher education in the era of neoliberal globalization: Latin America in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 43, 429-455.
56.
TrowM. (2001). The development of information technology in American higher education. In GraubardS. R. (Ed.), The American academic profession (pp. 293-313). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Van der WendeM. C. (2003). Globalization and access to higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7, 193-206.
59.
VolkmannM. J.AndersonM. A. (1998). Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. Science Education, 82, 293-310.
60.
WatsonC. (2006). Narratives of practice and the construction of identity in teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12, 509-526.
61.
WhiteS. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning and institutional change: Some organisational perspectives on campus-wide e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 840-850.
62.
YoungK. (1999). Narrative embodiments: Enclaves of the self in the realm of medicine. In JaworskiA.CouplandN. (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 407-418). New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
ZimmermanB. J.BanduraA.Martinez-PonsM. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 663-676.
64.
Zorrilla-AbascalM. L. (2012). e-UAEM: Espacio de formacion multimodal [e-UAEM: A multimodal education space]. In VelandiaS. A. T.RiosC. B. (Eds.), Los profesores universitarios y las TIC: Uso, apropiacion, experiencias (pp. 133-163). Mexico City, Mexico: Juan Pablos.
