This study describes the effects of neo-liberal restructuring for universities upon the reconfiguration of academics’ work context in a public state university in Mexico. Findings show that implementation of the federal program titled Faculty Enhancement Program during the late 1990s created a separation between traditional and new academic practices and values in the university. Analysis of the context illustrates ways in which State interventions lead to tensions over institutional goals and specifically the work of faculty.
AgarM. H. (1996). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. New York: Academic Press.
2.
AguerrondoI. A. (2004). Challenges in educational policy and reforms about teacher education. In PuryearJ. M.GajardoM. (Eds.), Schoolteachers in Latin America: New perspectives about teacher education and development. (pp. 97-141). Santiago de Chile: San Marino.
3.
AsklingB. (2001). Higher education and academic staff in a period of policy and system change. Higher Education, 41(1/2), 157-181.
4.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1992). Qualitative research in education. An introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
BrownA. D.StarkeyK. (2000). Organizational identity and learning: A psychodynamic perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 102-120.
6.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7.
ChavoyaM. L.BaronaC.ReynagaS. (2006). El trabajo académico en la encrucijada de las políticas. Estudios de caso en la Universidad de Guadalajara [Academic work in the midst of educational policies. The case study of the University of Guadalajara]. Guadalajara, Jalisco: Universidad de Guadalajara.
8.
ColeA. L.KnowlesG. (2000). Researching teaching. Exploring teacher development through reflexive inquiry. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2005). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sange handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sange.
10.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1991). Introduction. In DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
EmersonR.FretzR.ShawL. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
EricksonF. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
13.
EricksonF. (1987). Conceptions of school culture: An overview. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 11-24.
14.
FeldmanM. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611-629.
15.
FeldmanM. S.PentlandB. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
16.
FriendlandR.AlfordR. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In DiMaggioP.PowellW. (Eds.), New institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
GeertzC. (1973a). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
18.
GeertzC. (1973b). Thick description: Toward and interpretative theory of culture. In GeertzC. (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
19.
Gil-AntónM. (1994). Los rasgos de la diversidad. Un estudio estudio sobre los académicos mexicanos [Features of diversity. A study about Mexican academics]. Mexico, DF: UAM-A.
20.
Gil-AntónM. (2000). Los académicos en los noventa: ¿Actores, sujetos, espectadores o rehenes? [Academics in the 1990s: ¿Actors, subjects, spectator, or hostages?Electronic Review in Educational Research, 2(1), 101-116]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2(1), 101-116.
21.
Gil-AntónM. (2003). Big city love: The academic workplace in Mexico. In AltbachP. G. (Ed.), The decline of the guru. The academic profession in developing and middle-income countries (pp. 23-51). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
GioiaD. A.SchultzM.CorleyK. G. (2000). Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 63-81.
23.
GraysonG. W. (2010). Mexico: Narco-violence and a failed state?New Brunswick: Transaction.
24.
Guevara-NieblaG. (1992). La catastrofe silenciosa [The silent catastrophe]. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
25.
GuevaraP. G. (2004). Mujeres académicas. El caso de una universidad estatal mexicana [Academic women. A case study of a Mexican state university]. México, DF: Plaza y Valores Editores.
26.
Hernández-RodríguezR. (2003). The renovation of old institutions: State governors and the political transition in Mexico. Latin American Politics and Society, 45(4), 97-127.
27.
HiskeyJ. (2005). The political economy of subnational economic recovery in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 40(1), 30-55.
28.
Ibarra-ColadoE. (2002). La “nueva universidad” en México: Transformaciones recientes y perspectivas [The new university in México: Current transformations and perspectives. Mexican Journal in educational Research, 7(14), 75-105]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 7(14), 75-105.
29.
Ibarra-ColadoE.Porter-GaletarL. (2007). Dilemas de la evaluación del trabajo académico: Estamos preparados para transitar del castigo a la valoración? In BarrigaA. D.MéndezT. P. (Eds.), Evaluación y cambio institucional (pp. 146-172) [Dilemmas about the evaluation of academic work: Are we prepared to shift from punihsment to assessment? In BarrigaA. D.MéndezT. P. (Eds.), Evaluation and institutional change (pp. 146-172)]. México: Paidós.
30.
Izquierdo-SánchezM. A. (2000). Sobrevivir a los estimulos: Académicos, estrategias y conflictos (Vol. 15) [Surviving to reward structures:Academics, strategies, and conflicts (Vol. 15)]. México, Distrito Federal: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
31.
JermierJ. M.SlocumJ. W.FryL. W.GainesJ. (1991). Organizational subcultures in a soft bureaucracy: Resistance behind the myth and facade of an official culture. Organization Science, 2(2), 170-194.
32.
KlesnerJ. L. (2001). Adiós to the PRI? Changing voter turnout in Mexico's political transition. Mexican Studies, 17(1), 17-39.
MerriamS. B. (2002). The nature of qualitative inquiry. In MerriamS. B. (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice. Examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 3-36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
MintzbergH. (1991). The professional bureaucracy. In PetersonM. (Ed.), Organization and governance in higher education. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
39.
MoralesS. L.McGinnN. F. (1982). Faculty Development in Mexican Universities. Journal of Higher Education, 53, 532-551.
OrdorikaI. (1996). Reform at Mexico’s national autonomous university: Hegemony or bureaucracy. Higher Education, 31, 403-427.
42.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). OECD thematic review of tertiary education. Country background report for Mexico. Mexico City: Ministry of Education in Mexico.
43.
OrtnerS. (2006). Anthropology and social theory. Culture, power, and the acting subject. London: Duke Univeristy Press.
44.
PatenostroS. (1995). Mexico as a narco-democracy. World Policy Journal, 12(1), 41-47.
45.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, London: Sage.
46.
PawsonR. (1996). Theorizing the interview. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 295-314.
47.
PorterL. (2003). La universidad de papel: Ensayos sobre la educacion superior en México [The university made of paper: Essays about higher education in Mexico]. México, DF: Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades.
48.
PusserB.KempnerK.MarginsonS.OrdorikaI. (2012). Universities and the public sphere: Knowledge creation and state building in the era of globalization. New York: Routledge.
49.
RockwellE. (1995). The everyday school. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica
50.
RockwellE. (1996). Keys to appropriation: Rural school in Mexico. In LevinsonB. A.HollandD.FoleyD. (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person (pp. 301-324). New York: State University of New York Press.
51.
RockwellE. (1999). Recovering history in the study of schooling: From the Longue Duree to everyday co-construction. Human Development, 42(3), 1-10.
52.
SeddonT.OzgaJ.LevinJ. S. (In press). Global Transitions and Teacher Professionalism. In SeddonT.LevinJ. S. (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2013. Educators, professionalism and politics: Global transitions, national spaces, and professional projects. London: Routledge.
53.
SilvaA. A. (2000). Estado, políticas y universidades en un periodo de transición: Analysis de tres experiencias institucionales en México [State, policies, and universities in an age of transition:An analysis of institutional experiences in Mexico]. Guadalajara: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
54.
SlaughterS.LeslieL. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
SpiggleS. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491-503.
56.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action. Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
57.
SwidlerA. (2001). Talk of love. How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
VairaM. (2004). Globalization and higher education organizational change: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 48, 483-510.
59.
VidalesG. U.SahagúnG. A.OcaJ. R. (2006). Programa de Mejoramiento del Profesorado: Un primer análisis de su operación e impactos en el proceso de fortalecimiento académico de las universidades públicas. PROMEP [Faculty Enhancement Program: A first analysis about its implementation and impact on the betterment of academic life at public universities. PROMEP]. Retrieved from http://ses4.sep.gob.mx/pe/promep/PROMEPanalisis1.pdf
60.
WanderseeJ. H. (2001). Using concept mapping as a knowledge mapping tool. In FisherK. M.WanderseeJ. H.MoodyD. E. (Eds.), Mapping biology knowledge (pp. 127-143). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
61.
YangR. (2003). Globalisation and higher education development: A critical analysis. International Review of Education, 49, 269-291.