Social network analyses, combined with qualitative analyses, are examined to understand key components of the college trajectories of 261 Latina/o students. Their social network ties reveal variation in extensity and the relevance. Most ties facilitate social capital relevant to getting into college, fewer engage social capital relevant to strategizing success in college, and even fewer provide social capital benefits useful for planning career/professional trajectories.
AttinasiJ. (1989). Getting in: Mexican Americans’ perceptions of university attendance and the implications for freshman year persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 60, 247-277.
2.
AuerbachS. (2007). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of color. Urban Education, 42, 250-283.
3.
BernierA.LaroseS.SoucyN. (2005). Academic mentoring in college: The interactive role of student’s and mentor’s interpersonal dispositions. Research in Higher Education, 46, 29-51.
4.
BerryT. A. (2008). The role of social capital in human capital investment: A social network approach to college success in the first year (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.
5.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
6.
CabreraA.Deil-AmenR.PrahbuK.TerenziniP.LeeC. (2006). Increasing the college preparedeness of at-risk students. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5(2), 79-97.
7.
CammarotaJ.MollL.CannellaC.GonzalezM. (2010). Sociocultural perspectives on inter-personal relationships in school. In NietoS.RiveraM. (Eds.), Charting a new course: Understanding the sociocultural, political, economic, and historical context of Latino/a education in the United States. Austin, TX: National Latino Education Research Agenda Project.
8.
CejaM. (2004). Chicana college aspirations and the role of parents: Developing educational resiliency. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3, 338-362.
9.
ClarkeC. G.AntonioA. (2009). Re-thinking research on the impact of racial diversity in higher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. Vancouver, BC.
10.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.
11.
CoffeyA.AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
DegenneA.ForséM. (1999). Introducing social networks (BorgesA., Trans.). London, UK: SAGE.
13.
DurkheimE. (1951). Suicide. (SpauldingJ.SimpsonG., Trans.). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press. (Original work published in 1897).
14.
GándaraP. (1995). Over the ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
15.
GándaraP.MejoradoM. (2005). Putting your money where your mouth is: Mentoring as a strategy to increase access to higher education. In TierneyW. G.CorwinZ. B.ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 89-110). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
16.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
17.
GonzálezK.StoneC.JovelJ. (2003). Understanding the role of social capital in access to college for Latinas: Toward a college opportunity framework. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 2, 146-170.
18.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
JunA.ColyarJ. (2002). Parental guidance suggested: Family involvement in college preparation programs. In TierneyW. G.HagedornL. S. (Eds.), Increasing access to college: Extending possibilities for all students (pp. 195-215). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21.
LinN. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467-487.
22.
MarinP.YunJ. T.LeeC.HellerD. E.KurlaenderM.FeltsE.. . . OrfieldG. A. (2008). The educational pipeline and its consequences for students: Realizing Bakke’s legacy. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
23.
MollicaK.GrayB.TreviñoL. ( 2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14(2), 123-136.
24.
MollL. (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In LeeC.SmagorinskyP. (Eds.), Vygostkyan perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 256-268). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
National Center on Educational Statistics. (2010). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
26.
PérezP. A.McDonoughP. M. (2008). Understanding Latina and Latino college choice: A social capital and chain migration analysis. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 7, 249-265.
27.
PernaL. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartJ. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XXI, pp. 99-157). New York, NY: Agathon.
28.
PernaL.ThomasS. (2006). A framework for reducing the college success gap and promoting success for all. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
29.
PernaL.TitusM. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Journal of Higher Education, 76, 485-518.
30.
PersonA.RosenbaumJ. (2006). Chain enrollment and college enclaves: Benefits and drawbacks of Latino college students’ enrollment decisions. New Directions for Community Colleges, 133, 51-60.
31.
PlankS. B.JordanW. J. (2001). Effects of information, guidance, and actions on postsecondary destinations: A study of talent loss. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 947-979.
32.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1-24.
33.
Rios-AguilarC.KiyamaJ. (2012). Funds of knowledge: A proposed approach to study Latina/o students’ transition to college. Journal of Latinos and Education, 11(1), 2-16.
34.
Rios-AguilarC.KiyamaJ.GravittM.MollL. (2011). Funds of knowledge for the poor and forms of capital for the rich?: A capital approach to examining funds of knowledge. Theory and Research in Education, 9, 163-184.
35.
SandefurR. L.LaumannE. O. (1998). A paradigm for social capital. Rationality and Society, 10, 481-501.
36.
Stanton-SalazarR.DornbuschS. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116-135.
37.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
38.
TerenziniP. T.PascarellaE. T. (1980). Student/faculty relationships and freshman year educational outcomes: A further investigation. Journal of College Student Personnel, 21, 521-528.
39.
ThomasS. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 591-615.
40.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
TurleyR. N. L. (2006). When parents want children to stay home for college. Research in Higher Education, 47, 823-846.
42.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.–Mexican youth and the politics of caring. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
43.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1995). Social network analysis. Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
