Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2004-07
The Accommodation of University Students with Disabilities Inventory (AUSDI): Assessing American and Mexican Faculty Attitudes toward Students with Disabilities
An instrument was constructed to assess faculty attitudes toward university students with disabilities and accommodations in the United States and México. Faculty in the United States were more positive about their professional development and had more positive general assumptions about students with disabilities. Faculty in both countries were very similar in their willingness to accommodate most types of students with disabilities and to become friends with people with disabilities.
Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
2.
Baggett, D. (1994, March). A study of faculty awareness of students with disabilities Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Developmental Education, Kansas City, MO.
3.
Becker, M., Martin, L., Wajeeh, E., Ward, J., & Shern, D. (2002). Students with mental illness in a university setting: Faculty and student attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and experiences. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25, 359-367.
4.
Beilke, J. R., & Yseel, N. (1999). The chilly climate for students with disabilities in higher education. College Student Journal, 33, 364-371.
5.
Blacqua, T. C., Rapaport, R. J., & Kruse, B. G. (1996). Perceptions of classroom accommodations among college students with disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 400 640)
6.
Bourke, A. B., Strehorn, K. C., & Silver, P. (2000). Faculty members’ provision of instructional accommodations to students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 26-33.
7.
Cook, B. G. (2001). A comparison of teachers’ attitudes toward their included students with mild and severe disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 34(4), 203-214.
8.
Deshler, D. D., Ellis, E. S., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods. Denver, CO: Love Publishing.
9.
Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., Murphy, K., & Dempsey, K. (2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: A survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(4), 357-364.
10.
Harrison, L., & Gardner, D. (1999). Summer pre-college programs for students with disabilities (Report No. HE 032 371). Washington, DC: American Council on Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED434593)
11.
Hernandez, B., Keys, C., Balcazar, F., & Drum, C. (1998). Construction and validation of the disability rights attitude scale: Assessing attitudes toward the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Rehabilitation Psychology, 43(3), 203-218.
12.
Kercher, P., & Parisot, A. (1989). Access to postsecondary education: A faculty handbook (Report No. EC 221 740). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED313871)
13.
Leyser, Y. (1989). A survey of faculty attitudes and accommodations for students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 7(3 & 4), 97-108.
14.
Leyser, Y., Vogel, S., Wyland, S., Brulle, A., Sharoni, V., & Vogel, G. (2000). Students with disabilities in higher education: Perspectives of American and Israeli faculty members. International Education, 29(2), 47-67.
15.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). School-teacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
McCrink, C., & Wolman, C. (2002, March). Preparing persons with disabilities for the university to workforce transition: Employers’ attitudes and sensitivity training across cultures. Paper presented at the Oxford Round Table, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
17.
Morris, M., Leuenberger, J., & Aksamit, D. (1987). Faculty inservice training: Impact on the post-secondary climate for learning disabled students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 5, 57-66.
18.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Postsecondary students with disabilities: Enrollment, services, and persistence. Washington, DC: Author.
19.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary institutions: 1999-2000. Washington, DC: Author.
20.
Nelson, J. R., Dodd, J. M., & Smith, D. J. (1990). Faculty willingness to accommodate students with learning disabilities: A comparison among academic divisions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 185-189.
21.
Poppleton, P. (1992). The significance of being alike: The implications of similarities and differences in the work-perceptions of teachers in an international five-country study. Comparative Education, 28(2), 215-223.
22.
Ramos, E. G., & Fletcher, T. V. (1998). Special education and education reform in Mexico: Providing quality education to a diverse student population. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 13(1), 29-42.
23.
Reich-Erdmann, G. (1999). Educational opportunities for children with disabilities in Mexico. Bilingual Review, 24(1), 135-146.
24.
Scott, S. S. (1997). Accommodating college students with learning disabilities: How much is enough?Innovative Higher Education, 22(2), 85-99.
25.
Sweener, K., Kundert, D., May, D., & Quinn, K. (2002). Comfort with accommodations at the community college level. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 12-18.
26.
Szymanski, E. M., Hewitt, G. J., Watson, E. A., & Swett, E. A. (1999). Faculty and instructor perception of disability support services and student communication. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22, 117-128.
27.
Tait, K., & Purdie, N. (2000). Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian university. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1), 25-38.
28.
Voeltz, L. M. (1980). Children’s attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 455-464.
29.
Yuen, J. W. L., & Shaughnessy, B. (2001). Cultural empowerment: Tools to engage and retain postsecondary students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 16, 199-207.