Correlated random-effects (Mundlak, 1978, Econometrica 46: 69–85; Wooldridge, 2010, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data [MIT Press]) and hybrid models (Allison, 2009, Fixed Effects Regression Models [Sage]) are attractive alternatives to standard random-effects and fixed-effects models because they provide within estimates of level 1 variables and allow for the inclusion of level 2 variables. I discuss these models, give estimation examples, and address some complications that arise when interaction effects are included.
BaltagiB. H.2008. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. 4th ed. New York: Wiley.
4.
BurnettK., and FarkasG.2009. Poverty and family structure effects on children's mathematics achievement: Estimates from random and fixed effects models. The Social Science Journal46: 297–318.
5.
CurranP. J., and BauerD. J.2011. The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology62: 583–619.
6.
EpsteinA. J., KetchamJ. D., RathoreS. S., and GroeneveldP. W.2012. Variations in the use of an innovative technology by payer: the case of drug-eluting stents. Medical Care50: 1–9.
7.
HalabyC. N.2003. Panel models for the analysis of change and growth in life course studies. In Handbook of the Life Course, ed. MortimerJ. T., and ShanahanM. J., 503–527. New York: Springer.
8.
HalabyC. N.2004. Panel models in sociological research: Theory into practice. Annual Review of Sociology30: 507–544.
9.
HausmanJ. A., and TaylorW. E.1981. A generalized specification test. Economics Letters8: 239–245.
10.
JannB.2007a. center: Stata module to center (or standardize) variables. Statistical Software Components S444102, Department of Economics, Boston College.http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s444102.html.
11.
JannB.2007b. Stata tip 44: Get a handle on your sample. Stata Journal7: 266–267.
12.
JonesA., RiceN., d'UvaT. B., and BaliaS.2007. Applied Health Economics.Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
13.
KaufmanR. L.1993. Decomposing longitudinal from cross-unit effects in panel and pooled cross-sectional designs. Sociological Methods and Research21: 482–504.
14.
KreftI. G. G., de LeeuwJ., and AikenL. S.1995. The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research30: 1–21.
15.
LandaleN. S., GormanB. K., and OropesaR. S.2006. Selective migration and infant mortality among Puerto Ricans. Maternal and Child Health Journal10: 351–360.
16.
MundlakY.1978. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica46: 69–85.
17.
NeuhausJ. M., and KalbfleischJ. D.1998. Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. Biometrics54: 638–645.
18.
NomaguchiK. M., and BrownS. L.2011. Parental strains and rewards among mothers: The role of education. Journal of Marriage and Family73: 621–636.
19.
OuseyG. C., and WilcoxP.2007. The interaction of antisocial propensity and life-course varying predictors of delinquent behavior: Differences by method of estimation and implications for theory. Criminology45: 313–354.
20.
ParkC. Y., LeeM. A., and EpsteinA. J.2009. Variation in emergency department wait times for children by race/ethnicity and payment source. Health Services Research Journal44: 2022–2039.
21.
PhillipsJ. A.2006. Explaining discrepant findings in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses: An application to U.S. homicide rates. Social Science Research35: 948–974.
22.
Rabe-HeskethS., and SkrondalA.2008. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
23.
RaudenbushS.1989a. “Centering” predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices and consequences. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter1(2): 10–12.
24.
RaudenbushS.1989b. A Response to Longford and Plewis. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter1: 8–11.
25.
SchempfA. H., KaufmanJ. S., MesserL. C., and MendolaP.2011. The neighborhood contribution to black–white perinatal disparities: An example from two North Carolina counties, 1999–2001. American Journal of Epidemiology174: 744–752.
26.
TeachmanJ.2011. Modeling repeatable events using discrete-time data: Predicting marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family73: 525–540.
27.
WooldridgeJ. M.2010. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
ZhouM.2011. Intensification of geo-cultural homophily in global trade: Evidence from the gravity model. Social Science Research40: 193–209.