The use of flexible models for the relationship between a quantitative covariate and the response variable can be limited by the difficulty in interpreting the regression coefficients. In this article, we present a new postestimation command, xblc, that facilitates tabular and graphical presentation of these relationships. Cubic splines are given special emphasis. We illustrate the command through several worked examples using data from a large study of Swedish men on the relation between physical activity and the occurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms.
BuisM. L.2008. postrcspline: Stata module containing postestimation commands for models using a restricted cubic spline. Statistical Software Components S456928, Department of Economics, Boston College.http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456928.html.
2.
DurrlemanS., and SimonR.1989. Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Statistics in Medicine8: 551–561.
3.
GreenlandS.1995a. Avoiding power loss associated with categorization and ordinal scores in dose–response and trend analysis. Epidemiology6: 450–454.
4.
GreenlandS.1995b. Dose–response and trend analysis in epidemiology: Alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology6: 356–365.
5.
GreenlandS.1995c. Previous research on power loss associated with categorization in dose–response and trend analysis. Epidemiology6: 641–642.
6.
GreenlandS.1995d. Problems in the average-risk interpretation of categorical dose–response analyses. Epidemiology6: 563–565.
7.
GreenlandS.2008. Introduction to regression models. In Modern Epidemiology, ed. RothmanK. J., GreenlandS., and LashT. L., 3rd ed., 381–417. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8.
GreenlandS., and LashT. L.2008. Bias analysis. In Modern Epidemiology, ed. RothmanK. J., GreenlandS., and LashT. L., 3rd ed., 345–380. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
9.
GreenlandS., MichelsK. B., RobinsJ. M., PooleC., and WillettW. C.1999. Presenting statistical uncertainty in trends and dose–response relations. American Journal of Epidemiology149: 1077–1086.
10.
GreenlandS., and PooleC.1995. Interpretation and analysis of differential exposure variability and zero-exposure categories for continuous exposures. Epidemiology6: 326–328.
11.
HarrellF. E.Jr.2001. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis.New York: Springer.
12.
HarrellF. E.Jr., LeeK. L., and PollockB. G.1988. Regression models in clinical studies: Determining relationships between predictors and response. Journal of the National Cancer Institute80: 1198–1202.
13.
MarrieR. A., DawsonN. V., and GarlandA.2009. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology62: 511–517.
14.
OrsiniN., BelloccoR., BottaiM., WolkA., and GreenlandS.2008. A tool for deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis of epidemiologic studies. Stata Journal8: 29–48.
15.
OrsiniN., RashidKhaniB., AnderssonS.-O., KarlbergL., JohanssonJ.-E., and WolkA.2006. Long-term physical activity and lower urinary tract symptoms in men. Journal of Urology176: 2546–2550.
16.
RoystonP., AltmanD. G., and SauerbreiW.2006. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: A bad idea. Statistics in Medicine25: 127–141.
17.
RoystonP., AmblerG., and SauerbreiW.1999. The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology28: 964–974.
18.
RoystonP., and SauerbreiW.2007. Multivariable modeling with cubic regression splines: A principled approach. Stata Journal7: 45–70.
19.
RoystonP.2008. Multivariable Model-building: A Pragmatic Approach to Regression Analysis Based on Fractional Polynomials for Modelling Continuous Variables.Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
RoystonP.2009. Bootstrap assessment of the stability of multivariable models. Stata Journal9: 547–570.
21.
SmithP. L.1979. Splines as a useful and convenient statistical tool. American Statistician33: 57–62.
22.
SteenlandK., and DeddensJ. A.2004. A practical guide to dose–response analyses and risk assessment in occupational epidemiology. Epidemiology15: 63–70.
23.
WegmanE. J., and WrightI. W.1983. Splines in statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association78: 351–365.