We extend our 2003 paper on instrumental variables and generalized method of
moments estimation, and we test and describe enhanced routines that address
heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent standard errors, weak
instruments, limited-information maximum likelihood and k-class
estimation, tests for endogeneity and Ramsey's regression specification-error
test, and autocorrelation tests for instrumental variable estimates and
panel-data instrumental variable estimates.
AhnS. C.1997. Orthogonality tests in linear
models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and
Statistics59: 183–186.
2.
AndersonT. W.1951. Estimating linear restrictions on regression
coefficients for multivariate normal distributions.
Annals of Mathematical Statistics22: 327–351.
3.
AndersonT. W.1984. Introduction to Multivariate Statistical
Analysis. 2nd ed. New York:
Wiley.
4.
AndersonT. W., and RubinH.1949. Estimation of the parameters of a single
equation in a complete system of stochastic equations.
Annals of Mathematical Statistics20: 46–63.
5.
AndrewsD. W. K.1991. Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation
consistent covariance matrix estimation.
Econometrica59: 817–858.
6.
BaumC. F.2006. An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using
Stata.College Station, TX: Stata
Press.
7.
BaumC. F., SchafferM. E., and
StillmanS.2003. Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and
testing. Stata Journal3: 1–31.
8.
BaumC. F.2004. Software updates: Instrumental variables and
GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal4: 224.
9.
BaumC. F.2005. Software updates: Instrumental variables and
GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal5: 607.
10.
BoundJ., JaegerD., and BakerR.1995. Problems with instrumental variable estimation
when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory
variables is weak. Journal of the American
Statistical Association90: 443–450.
11.
BreuschT., QianH., SchmidtP., and WyhowskiD.1999. Redundancy of moment
conditions. Journal of Econometrics91: 89–111.
12.
ChernozhukovV., and HansenC.2005. The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with
weak instruments. Working Paper, University of
Chicago, Graduate School of Business.
13.
CraggJ. G., and DonaldS. G.1993. Testing identifiability and specification in
instrumental variables models. Econometric
Theory9: 222–240.
14.
CumbyR. E., and
HuizingaJ.1992. Testing the autocorrelation structure of
disturbances in ordinary least squares and instrumental variables
regressions. Econometrica60: 185–195.
15.
CushingM., and McGarveyM.1999. Covariance matrix estimation.
In Generalized Methods of Moments Estimation, ed.
MatyasL.Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
16.
DavidsonR., and MacKinnonJ. G.1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics.
2nd ed. New York: Oxford
University Press.
17.
DufourJ.-M.2003. Identification, weak instruments and statistical
inference in econometrics. Working Paper 2003s-49,
CIRANO.
18.
FrischR., and WaughF. V.1933. Partial time regressions as compared with
individual trends. Econometrica1: 387–401.
19.
FullerW. A.1977. Some properties of a modification of the
limited information estimator. Econometrica45: 939–53.
HahnJ., and HausmanJ.2002. Notes on bias in estimators for simultaneous
equation models. Economics Letters75: 237–41.
22.
HahnJ., HausmanJ., and
KuersteinerG.2004. Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of
higher-order bias and MSE approximations.
Econometrics Journal7: 272–306.
23.
HallA. R.2005. Generalized Method of Moments.Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
24.
HallA. R., and PeixeF. P. M.2003. A consistent method for the selection of
relevant instruments. Econometric Reviews22: 269–287.
25.
HallA. R., RudebuschG. D., and WilcoxD. W.1996. Judging instrument relevance in instrumental
variables estimation. International Economic
Review37: 283–298.
26.
HansenL.1982. Large sample properties of generalized method
of moments estimators. Econometrica50: 1029–1054.
27.
HansenL., HeatonJ., and YaronA.1996. Finite sample properties of some alternative
GMM estimators. Journal of Business and Economic
Statistics14: 262–280.
28.
HayashiF.2000. Econometrics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
29.
KleibergenF., and PaapR.2006. Generalized reduced rank tests using the
singular-value decomposition. Journal of
Econometrics127: 97–126.
30.
KleibergenF., and SchafferM.2007. ranktest: Stata module to test the rank of a matrix
using the Kleibergen–Paap rk statistic. Boston College Department
of Economics, Statistical Software Components S456865. Downloadable from
http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456865.html.
31.
LovellM.1963. Seasonal adjustment of economic time
series. Journal of the American Statistical
Association58: 993–1010.
32.
MikushevaA., and PoiB. P.2006. Tests and confidence sets with correct size
when instruments are potentially weak. Stata
Journal6: 335–347.
33.
MoreiraM. J., and PoiB. P.2003. Implementing tests with correct size in the
simultaneous equations model. Stata Journal3: 57–70.
34.
NagarA. L.1959. The bias and moment matrix of the general
k-class estimators of the parameters in simultaneous
equations. Econometrica27: 575–595.
35.
NeweyW. K., and WestK. D.1987a. Hypothesis testing with efficient method of
moments estimation. International Economic
Review28: 777–787.
36.
NeweyW. K.1987b. A simple, positive semi-definite,
heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance
matrix. Econometrica55: 703–708.
37.
NeweyW. K.1994. Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix
estimation. Review of Economic Studies61: 631–653.
38.
PaganA. R., and HallD.1983. Diagnostic tests as residual
analysis. Econometric Reviews2: 159–218.
39.
PesaranM. H., and TaylorL. W.1999. Diagnostics for IV
regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics &
Statistics61: 255–281.
40.
PoskittD., and SkeelsC.2002. Assessing instrumental variable relevance: An
alternative measure and some exact finite sample theory. Technical
report, Monash University and University of
Melbourne.
41.
SarganJ.1988. Testing for misspecification after estimation
using instrumental variables. In Contributions to
econometrics: John Denis Sargan, ed.
MaasoumiE., vol. 1.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
42.
StaigerD., and StockJ. H.1997. Instrumental variables regression with weak
instruments. Econometrica65: 557–86.
43.
StockJ., and WatsonM.2003. Introduction to Econometrics.Reading, MA:
Addison–Wesley.
44.
StockJ. H., and WrightJ. H.2000. GMM with weak identification.
Econometrica68: 1055–1096.
45.
StockJ. H., WrightJ. H., and YogoM.2002. A survey of weak instruments and weak
identification in generalized method of moments.
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics20: 518–529.
46.
StockJ. H., and YogoM.2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV
regression. In Identification and Inference for
Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, ed.
AndrewsD. W. K., and
StockJ. H.,
80–108.
Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
47.
WooldridgeJ. M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel
Data.Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
48.
WooldridgeJ. M.2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern
Approach. 2nd ed. New York:
Thomson Learning.
