We extend our 2003 paper on instrumental variables and generalized method of moments estimation, and we test and describe enhanced routines that address heteroskedasticity- and autocorrelation-consistent standard errors, weak instruments, limited-information maximum likelihood and k-class estimation, tests for endogeneity and Ramsey's regression specification-error test, and autocorrelation tests for instrumental variable estimates and panel-data instrumental variable estimates.
AhnS. C.1997. Orthogonality tests in linear models. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics59: 183–186.
2.
AndersonT. W.1951. Estimating linear restrictions on regression coefficients for multivariate normal distributions. Annals of Mathematical Statistics22: 327–351.
3.
AndersonT. W.1984. Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
4.
AndersonT. W., and RubinH.1949. Estimation of the parameters of a single equation in a complete system of stochastic equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics20: 46–63.
5.
AndrewsD. W. K.1991. Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation. Econometrica59: 817–858.
6.
BaumC. F.2006. An Introduction to Modern Econometrics Using Stata.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
7.
BaumC. F., SchafferM. E., and StillmanS.2003. Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal3: 1–31.
8.
BaumC. F.2004. Software updates: Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal4: 224.
9.
BaumC. F.2005. Software updates: Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata Journal5: 607.
10.
BoundJ., JaegerD., and BakerR.1995. Problems with instrumental variable estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variables is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association90: 443–450.
11.
BreuschT., QianH., SchmidtP., and WyhowskiD.1999. Redundancy of moment conditions. Journal of Econometrics91: 89–111.
12.
ChernozhukovV., and HansenC.2005. The reduced form: A simple approach to inference with weak instruments. Working Paper, University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business.
13.
CraggJ. G., and DonaldS. G.1993. Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variables models. Econometric Theory9: 222–240.
14.
CumbyR. E., and HuizingaJ.1992. Testing the autocorrelation structure of disturbances in ordinary least squares and instrumental variables regressions. Econometrica60: 185–195.
15.
CushingM., and McGarveyM.1999. Covariance matrix estimation. In Generalized Methods of Moments Estimation, ed. MatyasL.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DavidsonR., and MacKinnonJ. G.1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
DufourJ.-M.2003. Identification, weak instruments and statistical inference in econometrics. Working Paper 2003s-49, CIRANO.
18.
FrischR., and WaughF. V.1933. Partial time regressions as compared with individual trends. Econometrica1: 387–401.
19.
FullerW. A.1977. Some properties of a modification of the limited information estimator. Econometrica45: 939–53.
HahnJ., and HausmanJ.2002. Notes on bias in estimators for simultaneous equation models. Economics Letters75: 237–41.
22.
HahnJ., HausmanJ., and KuersteinerG.2004. Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of higher-order bias and MSE approximations. Econometrics Journal7: 272–306.
23.
HallA. R.2005. Generalized Method of Moments.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
HallA. R., and PeixeF. P. M.2003. A consistent method for the selection of relevant instruments. Econometric Reviews22: 269–287.
25.
HallA. R., RudebuschG. D., and WilcoxD. W.1996. Judging instrument relevance in instrumental variables estimation. International Economic Review37: 283–298.
26.
HansenL.1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica50: 1029–1054.
27.
HansenL., HeatonJ., and YaronA.1996. Finite sample properties of some alternative GMM estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics14: 262–280.
28.
HayashiF.2000. Econometrics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
KleibergenF., and PaapR.2006. Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular-value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics127: 97–126.
30.
KleibergenF., and SchafferM.2007. ranktest: Stata module to test the rank of a matrix using the Kleibergen–Paap rk statistic. Boston College Department of Economics, Statistical Software Components S456865. Downloadable from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456865.html.
31.
LovellM.1963. Seasonal adjustment of economic time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association58: 993–1010.
32.
MikushevaA., and PoiB. P.2006. Tests and confidence sets with correct size when instruments are potentially weak. Stata Journal6: 335–347.
33.
MoreiraM. J., and PoiB. P.2003. Implementing tests with correct size in the simultaneous equations model. Stata Journal3: 57–70.
34.
NagarA. L.1959. The bias and moment matrix of the general k-class estimators of the parameters in simultaneous equations. Econometrica27: 575–595.
35.
NeweyW. K., and WestK. D.1987a. Hypothesis testing with efficient method of moments estimation. International Economic Review28: 777–787.
36.
NeweyW. K.1987b. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica55: 703–708.
37.
NeweyW. K.1994. Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. Review of Economic Studies61: 631–653.
38.
PaganA. R., and HallD.1983. Diagnostic tests as residual analysis. Econometric Reviews2: 159–218.
39.
PesaranM. H., and TaylorL. W.1999. Diagnostics for IV regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics61: 255–281.
40.
PoskittD., and SkeelsC.2002. Assessing instrumental variable relevance: An alternative measure and some exact finite sample theory. Technical report, Monash University and University of Melbourne.
41.
SarganJ.1988. Testing for misspecification after estimation using instrumental variables. In Contributions to econometrics: John Denis Sargan, ed. MaasoumiE., vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
StaigerD., and StockJ. H.1997. Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica65: 557–86.
43.
StockJ., and WatsonM.2003. Introduction to Econometrics.Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley.
44.
StockJ. H., and WrightJ. H.2000. GMM with weak identification. Econometrica68: 1055–1096.
45.
StockJ. H., WrightJ. H., and YogoM.2002. A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics20: 518–529.
46.
StockJ. H., and YogoM.2005. Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, ed. AndrewsD. W. K., and StockJ. H., 80–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
WooldridgeJ. M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
WooldridgeJ. M.2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 2nd ed. New York: Thomson Learning.
