Abstract
Introduction:
Effectively managing biological risk in a research setting requires a strong organizational commitment to promoting safe practices and adhering to established protocols, a concept known as a “culture of biosafety.” Although a sound culture of biosafety is critical for responsible conduct of research, its assessment remains challenging, relying on self-reporting and qualitative and subjective evaluations.
Methods:
To determine if a laboratory’s culture of biosafety could be evaluated objectively, we examined historical biosafety violation data at three U.S. universities, including biosafety cabinet recertification violations at one university and a range of violations at two other universities. These data were analyzed to determine the distribution of violations among investigators.
Results:
At all three institutions, we found that a majority of investigators operate laboratories with low rates of biosafety violations and few repeat violations; however, a minority of investigators operate laboratories that are repeatedly in violation of established biosafety guidelines and standards. Repeat violations were unequally distributed amongst laboratories, with only 20% of laboratories accounting for 70–90% of total repeat violations.
Discussion:
We found that a vast majority of investigators operate laboratories with commendable cultures of biosafety that manifest as low rates of violations and repeat violations.
Conclusion:
This research establishes metrics for evaluating a laboratory’s culture of biosafety with an objective evidence basis and transparent approach, laying the foundation for future research to understand the drivers of biosafety culture, create interventions to improve biosafety culture, and creating a near-term mechanism to promote biosafety culture at institutions via data-driven retention and recruitment strategies.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
