Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Women with gynecological cancer often experience psychological distress, particularly in response to surgical procedures. The impact of mandala art therapy (MAT) during the perioperative period for gynecological cancer patients remains uncertain. We aimed to examine the effects of the MAT program in women with gynecological cancer.

Methods:

Employing a quasi-experimental design, we recruited 126 gynecological cancer patients from a university hospital through convenience sampling. Participants were assigned to either receive the MAT program or standard perioperative care. The interventions comprised a three-session MAT program guided by a team of trained mandala psychologists. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to analyze the effects of MAT over time.

Results:

A total of 126 patients were enrolled, and 118 completed the entire study. Over 90% of participants completed the perioperative MAT interventions, reporting relatively high satisfaction with the program (7.70 out of 10). Individuals in the MAT group exhibited improved therapeutic effects on STAI-S, VASS, and vital signs over time. Notably, significant group*time interaction effects were noted in STAI-S scores at both the first evaluation, T1 (β = −4.220, P < .005) and the third evaluation, T3 (β = −3.797, P < .05), and VASS scores at T1 (β = −11.186, P < .005), T2 (β = −9.915, P < .05) and T3 (β = −9.831, P < .05). Regarding vital signs, the multivariate GEE model revealed significant interaction effects in systolic blood pressure values at both T1 (β = −7.102, P < .05) and T3 (β = −10.051, P < .005), diastolic blood pressure values at T3 (β = −6.441, P < .005), and pulse values at T1 (β = −6.085, P < .005). No significant differences were observed between groups for pain, hope, or self-acceptance.

Conclusion:

This study posited that MAT could serve as a valuable complementary approach in perioperative care for addressing the psychological needs of women with gynecological cancer. Subsequent research employing more robust methodologies and larger, more diverse participant samples will be necessary to validate these conclusions.

Keywords

mandala art therapy gynecological cancer perioperative psychological well-being

Introduction

Gynecological malignancies encompass cancers originating in women’s reproductive organs, including cervix uteri, corpus uteri, ovary, vulva, and vagina cancers, collectively ranking among the leading causes of female mortality globally. In 2020, 1 398 601 women were diagnosed, and 671 875 succumbed to gynecological cancers worldwide,¹ while in China alone, there were an estimated 252 010 new cases and 115 096 deaths in 2020.² The standard treatment for women with gynecological cancers often involves surgical procedures, such as hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. However, women diagnosed with gynecological cancers endure prolonged physical and mental burdens. Psychological challenges, including anxiety, depression, distress, heightened nervousness about the diagnosis and treatments, and even suicidal ideation are common.^3
-5 Physical burdens encompass pain, fatigue, and memory loss.⁵ Tumor resection, resulting in the partial loss of organs, can lead to functional and psychological disorders, characterized by alterations in body image, diminished self-esteem, and sexual dysfunction.⁶ Psychological disorders directly impact treatment adherence, endocrine and immune function, and overall survival rates in cancer patients.^7,8

The advent of art therapy, within the realm of complementary and alternative medicine, has significantly improved psychological outcomes for cancer patients. Expressive arts, which includes various forms such as music therapy, dance/movement therapy, poetry therapy, drama therapy, writing therapy, and mandala therapy, aim to enhance psychological well-being and inner peace through artistic expression. Individuals in the process of creating art explore their feelings, express emotions and thoughts, recharge and rediscover themselves, and achieve inner calm through artistic symbols and signs. Art therapy has gained recognition as a practical and applicable approach in addressing a variety of physical and psychological conditions, providing benefits such as improved affective conditions, relief from anxiety and depression symptoms, remission of cancer-related fatigue, enhanced quality of life, and increased perception of well-being and helpfulness in cancer patients.^9,10

Mandala, originating from Sanskrit, represents a circle, center, integrity, and completion. Drawing a mandala involves starting from a fixed point in the center and gradually expanding to cover the entire circle of the mandala, offering a meditative approach for relaxation, release, and rejuvenation. The creation of a mandala is categorized into 2 broad types: coloring a given template inside or outside a circle (structured mandala), and drawing free figures in a blank circle (unstructured mandala). Mandala art therapy (MAT) is practiced in various settings, including hospitals, psychiatric centers, community health centers, long-term care centers, care homes, and schools.¹¹

In recent years, the application of MAT as a complementary approach for cancer patients has gained recognition. Studies have shown significant effects of an 8-session MAT program in alleviating anxiety and distress symptoms and promoting emotional awareness and acceptance.^12,13 Additionally, a single-session MAT was found to alleviate anxiety and distress in breast cancer women undergoing chemotherapy.¹⁴ A randomized controlled study demonstrated that mandala drawing effectively relieved anxiety and depression symptoms in hospitalized adolescents with cancer.¹⁵ Women with gynecological cancer often experience psychological distress, particularly in response to surgical procedures. However, rapid rehabilitation shortens hospital stays, which may overlook the mental burdens experienced by patients. Therefore, a short complementary or alternative therapy during hospitalization is vital for establishing psychological well-being in gynecological cancer patients. Moreover, MAT intervention is simple and accessible, and requires no special equipment or artistic ability of individuals. However, the effects of MAT during the perioperative period in gynecological cancer patients remain uncertain due to a lack of evidence-based support from relevant studies.

This study hypothesized that individuals receiving MAT would experience an improvement in psychological distress through both subjective and objective measures. The primary objective was to assess whether MAT could alleviate perioperative anxiety and stress, relieve postoperative pain, and promote hope and self-acceptance in women with gynecological cancer.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

This was a prospective, non-randomized, controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of mandala art therapy on the psychological well-being of gynecological cancer patients during the perioperative period. This trial was conducted at a university hospital in Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China, which is one of the largest women's and children's hospitals in southwest China. A convenience sampling technique was used.

Women were considered eligible if they met all of the inclusion criteria: (1) diagnosed with any type or stage of gynecological cancer; (2) undergoing surgery; (3) aged 18 years or older; (4) capable of participating in this intervention; and (5) able to complete questionnaires in Chinese. Exclusion criteria included: (1) a serious physical or mental disease that could interfere with the intervention; (2) intellectual or cognitive impairment; (3) current engagement in mandala art therapy (MAT) practice; (4) severe perioperative medical complications; and (5) early withdrawal from the study. All participants provided written informed consent, and ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. 2021-189).

Procedure

Recruitments spanned from October 2021 to November 2022 at the Jinjiang District of the West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, employing a convenience sampling technique. Research assistants screened potential participants for interest and eligibility. If a woman satisfied the inclusion criteria, showed an interest in this study, and was available for the scheduled activities, an enrollment visit was carried out to sign the informed consent and complete the admission assessments. On enrollment, participants were given the choice to participate in the MAT program. Participants who did not select to participate in MAT formed the control group and received standard care.

Methods

Formation of the mandala art therapy team

The MAT program was executed by a team comprising 4 clinical nurses, among whom 2 had received training in professional psychological counseling techniques, and 3 had completed accredited coursework in mandala drawing or drawing psychotherapy and obtained a drawing certificate. Prior to the intervention, all team members received unified training to ensure the homogeneity of implementation. Researchers also participated in each training.

Development of the mandala art therapy protocol

The three-session MAT protocol was developed under the guidance of Prof. Chen Canrui, a leading figure of mandala art in China and a senior consultant psychiatrist from Guangzhou Medical University. The interventions took place before surgery following preoperative preparation (T1), on postoperative day 2 or day 3 (depending on patient availability) (T2), and on the discharge day (T3). The mandala templates were selected from “The Road of Mind: Mandala Growing and Healing Picture Book,”¹⁶ which was compiled by Prof. Chen Canrui. According to the different stages of psychological differentiation, it is organized into 7 chapters, namely, protection, differentiation, cohesion, integration, guidance, transcendence, and enlightenment. Considering the limited art-making experience of most patients, a structured mandala was initially chosen to improve the involvement of patients and provide a sense of security. In addition, 10 patients were selected for the trial test and their feedback was collected to modify the study protocol. The pilot data were not included in the final data analysis due to the revision of the protocol after the pilot study. The final intervention protocol is listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Intervention Protocol of Three-Session Mandala Art Therapy Program.

Contents	The first session	The second session	The third session
Theme	Stress Relief	Strength and Seeking Support	Future and Hope
Time point	Before surgery following preoperative preparation	On postoperative day 2 or day 3 (depending on patient availability)	On the discharge day
Objective	Relieve preoperative anxiety and stress, establishing a sense of security	Help patients seek positive strength and support during postoperative recovery	Enhance patients’ ability to cope with postoperative life and establish positive outlooks
Templates selection	Selected from the “protection” chapter, characterized by embracing and protecting, which can repair the internal self-nature function, enhance self-strength, improve the sense of security, reduce anxiety and fear, and improve the ability to resist pressure in a safe environment	Selected from the “cohesion” chapter, characterized by centricity and rotation, which can maintain the stability of self, improve attention and concentration, and increase psychological depth	Selected from the “transcendence” chapter, characterized by emptiness and sacredness, which can expand the psychological container and enhance the ability of love
Structured mandala coloring	Guide patients to color the selected patterns	Guide patients to color the selected patterns	Guide patients to color the selected patterns
Unstructured mandala drawing	Guide patients to draw the mandala under the subtheme of “safe place”	Guide patients to draw the mandala under the subtheme of “people I adore”	Guide patients to draw the mandala under the subtheme of “my dream”

Implementation of intervention and control

Participants in the control group received standard perioperative care as suggested at West China Second University Hospital, and completed measurements at 3 time points (T1, T2, and T3), mirroring the intervention group’s schedule. Standard perioperative care included basic nursing and caring, medication and parenteral treatments, diet and nutritional care, symptom management, illness and health education, and maintenance of psychological integrity at patients’ bedsides. For the intervention group, the MAT program was implemented alongside standard care. The MAT program comprised the following steps:

(a) Releasing and Relaxing the Body: Participants followed a music-based progressive relaxation.

(b) Selecting a Pre-drawn Mandala Template: Patients chose a mandala template prepared in advance.

(c) Coloring the Mandala: Colored pencils with 36 colors, A4 picture books, and erasers were provided for participants to color the mandala.

(d) Drawing Free Figures in a Given Circle: Patients engaged in free-form drawing within a designated circle.

(e) Sharing and Expressing Reflections: Participants shared their work and expressed reflections during the creation process.

The MAT team brought the three-session program to the patient’s bedside, allowing for convenient implementation. After initiating the activity, the researcher periodically left the bedside but returned every 10 to 15 minutes to monitor the patient’s progress and provide further assistance if necessary. Permission was obtained to share mandala drawings and their opinions about the work with the MAT team members. Each session lasted for 40 to 60 minutes, with the music progressive relaxation step taking around 5 to 10 minutes, the mandala coloring and drawing step lasting 30 to 40 minutes, and the artwork expression step spanning 5 to 10 minutes.

Outcome Assessment

Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at the time of enrollment (T0). Patient-reported outcome measures (STAI-S, and VASS) and vital signs (blood pressure, and pulse) were gathered before surgery (T1), on postoperative day 2 or day 3 (T2), and on the discharge day (T3). Additionally, the Herth Hope Index (HHI) and Self-Acceptance Questionnaire (SAQ) were collected at T0 and T3, perceived waiting time was collected at T1, and pain intensity was collected at T2.

The state-trait anxiety inventory-state scale (STAI-S)

The STAI-S, developed by Spielberger et al¹⁷ in 1970, comprises 20 items measuring immediate anxiety. The Chinese version (C-STAI) was translated by Li W et al¹⁸ in 1995 and scored on a 4-point Likert scale (1 = almost never, 4 = almost always), with high reliability and validity among Chinese populations.¹⁹ Overall, sufficient evidence of the reliability and validity of the STAI-S has been reported.^18
-21

The visual analog scale for stress (VASS)

A single-question tool recommended by Mitchell et al²² in 2008, the VASS uses a 100 mm line labeled from “no stress at all” to “most stress imaginable.” Participants rate their perceived stress on this ruler, providing a subjective score between 0 and 100. The evidence on the reliability and validity of the VASS has been well verified.^23
-25 It is a reliable and valid tool widely used in both clinical and research settings.^25
-27

Herth hope index (HHI)

Originally developed by Herth²⁸ and translated by Zhao et al,²⁹ the HHI comprises 12 items divided into 3 dimensions: temporality and future, positive readiness and expectancy, and interconnectedness. The Chinses version of HHI has been verified among Chinese patients and also showed good reliability and validity.³⁰ Scores range from 12 to 48 points, with higher scores meaning greater psychological hope. The HHI is a multi-dimensional scale, widely used in cancer patients.^31
-33

Self-acceptance questionnaire (SAQ)

Developed by Cong et al³⁴ in 1999, the SAQ is a 16-item self-report scale with 2 dimensions: self-evaluation and self-acceptance. Scores range from 16 to 64 with higher scores meaning better self-acceptance. It has indicated good reliability and validity in Chinese populations and is frequently used in cancer patients.^35,36

Pain intensity and satisfaction with MAT

Pain intensity was measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a 10 cm line, where participants mark the severity of their pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most extreme pain imaginable).³⁷ The benefit of MAT was also assessed using the VAS, scoring from 0 (no benefit with MAT) to 10 (full benefit with MAT).

Perceived waiting time

Perceived waiting time was assessed by inquiring about patients’ feelings when waiting for surgery after preoperative preparation. Patients indicated their perceived waiting time on a 30-minute scale when the actual waiting time was 30 minutes.

Statistical Analysis

The sample size, determined using G*Power 3.1.9³⁸ and preliminary study data, indicated that 102 patients would provide sufficient power (α = .05, 1 − β = .8) to observe a moderate effect (f = 0.5) of MAT. With an estimated 20% loss to follow-up, 122 patients were enrolled.

Continuous variables were presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR) based on distribution, while categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Differences in baseline characteristics were assessed using the Pearson Chi-square or Fisher’s Exact test.

For single measurement data, independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests were applied to compare between-group changes in continuous variables. For repeated measurement data, generalized estimating equations (GEE) were employed to assess MAT effects over time. Dependent variables included anxiety, stress, and vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse). Independent variables comprised groups (intervention vs control), time points (T0, T1, T2, and T3), and group*time interactions. All multivariable models were adjusted for potential confounders, including demographic variables (age, education level, marital status, residence, and diagnosis), and baseline variables imbalanced between groups (surgical mode and stress).

Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS) ver.23, and significance was set at 2-sided P < .05.

Results

Patients Characteristics

A total of 126 patients were enrolled, with 118 completing the study (59 in the intervention group and 59 in the control group; Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were largely similar between groups, except for surgical mode (Table 1). Predominantly, the patients were married (84.7%), lived with family or friends (91.5%), and possessed a lower education level (51.7% with junior high school or below). Almost a third of patients had open laparotomy (31.4%). Of the included patients, 54 (45.8%) patients had cervical, 30 (25.4%) had ovarian, 21 (17.8%) had endometrial, and 13 (11.0%) had other gynecological cancer. Baseline comparison of outcome variables showed no significant differences between groups, except for the Visual Analog Scale for Stress (VASS) score. Detailed characteristics are summarized in Tables 2 and 5.

Figure 1.

Flowchart on the study participants over the study period.

Table 2.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics at Baseline.

Variable	No. (%)			P Value
Variable	Overall (n = 118)	Intervention group (n = 59)	Control group (n = 59)	P Value
Age (M, SD)	45.42, 9.53	45.03, 9.39	45.81, 9.73	.659
Educational level
Primary school or below	24 (20.3)	8 (13.6)	16 (27.1)
Junior high school	37 (31.4)	18 (30.5)	19 (32.2)
Senior high school	19 (16.1)	13 (22.0)	6 (10.2)
Junior college	20 (16.9)	10 (16.9)	10 (16.9)
Bachelor or above	18 (15.3)	10 (16.9)	8 (13.6)	.240
Marital status
Married	100 (84.7)	49 (83.1)	51 (86.4)
Unmarried	8 (6.8)	3 (5.1)	5 (8.5)
Divorced/widowed	10 (8.5)	7 (11.9)	3 (5.1)	.334^a
Residence
Living alone	10 (8.5)	6 (10.2)	4 (6.8)
Living with family or friends	108 (91.5)	53 (89.8)	55 (93.2)	.509
Diagnosis
Cervical cancer	54 (45.8)	22 (37.3)	32 (54.2)
Ovarian cancer	30 (25.4)	18 (30.5)	12 (20.3)
Endometrial cancer	21 (17.8)	13 (22.0)	8 (13.6)
Other gynecological cancers	13 (11.0)	6 (10.2)	7 (11.9)	.229
Surgical mode
Open laparotomy	37 (31.4)	12 (20.3)	25 (42.4)
Not open laparotomy	81 (68.6)	47 (79.7)	34 (57.6)	.017*
STAI-S score (M, SD)	43.47, 11.13	42.92, 11.62	44.02, 10.69	.593
VASS score, median (IQR)	30 (10, 50)	40 (20, 50)	20 (0, 40)	.002^b**
SBP (M, SD)	116.85, 15.68	117.22, 16.92	116.48, 14.47	.797
DBP (M, SD)	73.20, 9.72	73.81, 10.85	72.58, 8.49	.492
Pulse (M, SD)	83.43, 12.48	84.76, 11.48	82.10, 13.37	.248

Abbreviations: M, mean; SD, standard deviation.

Fisher Exact Test.

Mann–Whitney U-test.

P < .05. **P < .001.

Anxiety, Stress, and Vital Signs Changes During Interventions

As shown in Table 3, the multivariate GEE model revealed a significant group*time interaction effect in the STAI-S score at T1 and T3. The STAI-S score was reduced more in the intervention group than in the control group from baseline at both T1 (β = −4.339, 95% CI = −6.158, −2.520; β = −.119, 95% CI = −0.372, 0.135) and T3 (β = −8.339, 95% CI = −10.903, −5.775; β = −4.542, 95% CI = −7.203, −1.881).

Table 3.

Effects of the Mandala Art Therapy on Anxiety, Stress, and Vital Signs.

Variables	Time	Intervention (n = 59)Mean (SE)	Control (n = 59)Mean (SE)	Group effects β (95% CI)	Time effects β (95% CI)	GxT intervention effectβ (95% CI)
Anxiety
	T0	41.24 (1.12)	45.69 (1.20)		Ref.	Ref.
	T1	36.90 (1.10)	45.57 (1.21)		−0.119 (−0.372, 0.135)	−4.220** (−6.057, −2.383)
	T2	36.67 (1.19)	39.69 (1.16)		−6.000** (−8.907, −3.093)	1.424 (−2.658, 5.506)
	T3	32.90 (1.15)	41.15 (1.20)	−4.446* (−7.772, −1.121)	−4.542** (−7.203, −1.881)	−3.797* (−7.492, −0.101)
Stress
	T0	34.87 (1.41)	30.05 (1.18)		Ref.	Ref.
	T1	24.02 (1.76)	30.38 (1.42)		0.339 (−1.068, 1.746)	−11.186** (−15.600, −6.773)
	T2	15.63 (1.95)	20.72 (2.57)		−9.322* (−15.178, −3.466)	−9.915* (−17.975, −1.856)
	T3	13.18 (2.39)	18.18 (2.19)	4.826* (0.988, 8.663)	−11.864* (−17.241, −6.488)	−9.831* (−18.160, −1.501)
Systolic blood pressure
	T0	117.45 (2.03)	114.49 (2.38)		Ref.	Ref.
	T1	112.41 (1.63)	116.55 (1.78)		2.068 (−1.534, 5.670)	−7.102* (−12.257, −1.946)
	T2	109.62 (1.73)	112.13 (1.79)		−2.356 (−6.560, 1.849)	−5.475 (−11.287, 0.338)
	T3	105.11 (1.49)	112.20 (1.75)	2.963 (−3.168, 9.094)	−2.288 (−6.884, 2.308)	−10.051** (−16.048, −4.053)
Diastolic blood pressure
	T0	73.94 (1.32)	72.33 (1.02)		Ref.	Ref.
	T1	73.69 (1.14)	73.25 (1.08)		0.915 (−0.059, 1.890)	−1.169 (−4.030, 1.691)
	T2	70.03 (1.14)	71.57 (1.16)		−0.763 (−3.191, 1.666)	−3.153 (−6.682, 0.377)
	T3	69.03 (1.04)	73.86 (1.16)	1.609 (−1.729, 4.947)	1.525 (−0.895, 3.945)	−6.441** (−10.105, −2.776)
Pulse-Adjusted
	T0	84.69 (1.55)	82.07 (1.50)		Ref.	Ref.
	T1	77.08 (1.26)	80.54 (1.63)		−1.525 (−3.283, 0.232)	−6.085** (−9.921, −2.249)
	T2	83.24 (1.26)	79.12 (1.27)		−2.949 (−6.166, 0.267)	1.492 (−3.114, 6.097)
	T3	79.59 (1.25)	78.71 (1.42)	2.624 (−1.533, 6.780)	−3.356 (−6.876, 0.164)	−1.746 (−6.366, 2.874)

Abbreviations: M, Mean; SE, Standard Error; β, Beta coeficien; GxT, Group*Time; CI, Confidence Interval.

P < .005. *P < .05.

VASS score showed a significant group*time interaction effect at each time point, with greater reductions in the intervention group than in the control group at T1 (β = −10.847, 95% CI = −15.031, −6.664; β = .339, 95% CI = −1.068, 1.746), T2 (β = −19.237, 95% CI = −24.775, −13.699; β = −9.322, 95% CI = −15.178, −3.466), and T3 (β = −21.695, 95% CI = −28.057, −15.333; β = −11.864, 95% CI = −17.241, −6.488).

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) value exhibited a significant group*time interaction effect at both T1 and T3, indicating greater reductions in the intervention group than in the control group from baseline at both T1 (β = −5.034, 95% CI = −8.723, −1.345; β = 2.068, 95% CI = −1.534, 5.670) and T3 (β = −12.339, 95% CI = −16.192, −8.486; β = −2.288, 95% CI = −6.884, 2.308). Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) value showed a significant group*time interaction effect at T3, with more reduction in the intervention group at T3 (β = −4.915, 95% CI = −7.667, −2.164; β = 1.525, 95% CI = −0.895, 3.945).

Pulse value demonstrated a significant group*time interaction effect at T1, indicating greater reductions in the intervention group at T1 (β = −7.610, 95% CI = −11.020, −4.200; β = −1.525, 95% CI = −3.283, 0.232).

These findings suggest that the MAT program had positive effects on anxiety, stress, and certain vital signs during the perioperative period for gynecological cancer patients.

Pain Intensity, Perceived Waiting Time, and Satisfaction with MAT

The intervention group experienced significantly shorter perceived waiting time compared to the control group (30.40 minutes [SD 10.25] vs 48.22 minutes [SD 12.38]). No significant differences in pain intensity at T2 between groups. The mean patient satisfaction score was 7.70 ± 1.65 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Pain Intensity, Perceived Waiting Time, and Satisfaction with MAT (Mean ± Standard Deviation).

Variable	Intervention group (n = 59)	Control group (n = 59)	Cohen’s d	P Value
Pain intensity^a	1.97 ± 1.25	2.36 ± 1.31	0.30	.100
Perceived waiting time (min)	30.40 ± 10.25	48.22 ± 12.38	1.57	<.001
Satisfaction with MAT	7.70 ± 1.65	NA	NA	NA

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable.

Pain intensity was measured at T2.

Hope and Self-acceptance Outcomes

No statistical difference in Herth Hope Index (HHI) and Self-acceptance Questionnaire (SAQ) scores between groups, though the intervention group showed higher average HHI scores (Table 5).

Table 5.

Hope and Self-Acceptance Outcomes (Mean ± Standard Deviation).

Variable	Baseline				After intervention
Variable	Intervention group (n = 59)	Control group (n = 59)	Cohen’s d	P Value	Intervention group (n = 59)	Control group (n = 59)	Cohen’s d	P Value
HHI score	39.59 ± 4.99	37.93 ± 4.98	0.33	.073	40.85 ± 4.93	39.22 ± 4.61	0.34	.067
Positive attitude toward reality and the future	12.97 ± 1.76	12.51 ± 1.62	0.27	.145	13.46 ± 1.80	12.90 ± 1.83	0.31	.097
Positive action	13.24 ± 1.77	12.54 ± 1.95	0.38	.055	13.53 ± 1.73	13.08 ± 1.48	0.28	.139
Maintaining close relations with others	13.39 ± 1.76	12.88 ± 1.83	0.28	.127	13.86 ± 1.81	13.24 ± 1.63	0.36	.051
SAQ score	45.93 ± 5.26	45.68 ± 5.15	0.05	.791	46.00 ± 5.77	46.64 ± 5.15	0.12	.524
Self-evaluation factor	23.31 ± 3.65	23.24 ± 3.69	0.02	.920	23.00 ± 3.67	23.59 ± 3.69	0.16	.383
Self-acceptance factor	22.63 ± 2.88	22.44 ± 3.16	0.06	.738	23.00 ± 3.09	23.05 ± 2.68	0.02	.924

Discussion

This study is the first clinical examination of the MAT program’s impact on perioperative anxiety, stress, pain, and hope in gynecological cancer patients. The findings indicate positive effects, with patients experiencing lower anxiety and stress scores, reduced vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pulse values), and shorter perceived waiting time.

Positive Effects of the MAT on Perioperative Anxiety, Stress, and Vital Signs

The MAT program significantly reduced anxiety in the intervention group as compared to controls, consistent with previous studies on breast cancer patients^12
-14 (Table 3). Mandala coloring in early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated a significant reduction in state anxiety scores.¹⁴ A randomized clinical trial found MAT to be a feasible intervention for improving emotional processing in breast cancer patients.¹³ MAT has also shown effectiveness in reducing anxiety in pediatric populations, as observed in hospitalized adolescents with cancer. A study performed by Gürcan et al¹⁵ showed that mandala drawings had positive benefits on anxiety and other psychological symptoms. A qualitative study revealed that unstructured mandala drawings could help patients cope better with cancer, with respect to hope for healing and psychological growth.³⁹

Stress scores decreased significantly over time in the MAT group, aligning with the therapeutic goals of the intervention (Table 3). This result adds to the very limited evidence on stress relief in gynecological cancer patients. Only 2 reports suggest effectiveness in relieving stress in management employees with chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain⁴⁰ and multiple sclerosis patients.⁴¹

The MAT group exhibited lower diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and pulse values compared with the control group (Table 3). Art therapy is associated with relaxation, increasing parasympathetic tone, and decreasing sympathetic activity.⁴² Anxiety and stress are identified to increase blood catecholamine concentrations⁴³ and cause sympathetic hyperactivation and parasympathetic withdrawal.⁴⁴ Excitement of the sympathetic nerve is usually characterized by increased heart rate and blood pressure, while parasympathetic excitation is associated with a relaxation response. The perioperative period for gynecological cancer patients is marked by psychological distress, making MAT a valuable complementary therapy. MAT’s positive impact on psychological well-being and physiological responses suggests its potential as part of comprehensive perioperative care.

Impact of MAT on Perceived Waiting Time, Hope and Self-Acceptance

MAT participants showed significant improvements in stress and anxiety, aligning with the study focus. Perceived waiting time for surgery also significantly improved in the MAT group (Table 4). Long perceived waiting time is strongly associated with overall dissatisfaction.⁴⁵ Prolonged waiting time could induce greater uncertainty, which in turn affects patients’ anxiety.⁴⁶ Preoperative anxiety, generated by the unpredictable and threatening situations of surgery procedures, is highly frequent in patients awaiting surgery.⁴⁷ A higher degree of preoperative anxiety is associated with a surgical delay or cancellation, severe postoperative pain, frequent readmission, and even higher mortality.^48,49 During the MAT program, preoperative anxiety significantly co-varied with perceived waiting time, with both manifesting an improvement in emotional burden.

However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding hope and self-acceptance (Table 5), which is contrary to the findings of the 8-session MAT program by Kim et al.⁵⁰. This indicates that intervention duration is an important influential factor. The intervention’s limited duration during the perioperative period may contribute to the lack of significant differences in hope and self-acceptance, as longer sessions may needed. According to previous studies, at least 8 sessions were recommended for cancer patients.^12,13,51 The concept of “Enhanced recovery after surgery” (ERAS) has been increasingly developed in gynecological cancer surgery, aiming to shorten the length of stay and promote perioperative recovery.⁵² In such a short hospital stay the psychological burdens of cancer patients could be neglected. In this study, the sessions are limited by the length of stay in perioperative patients, indicating that follow-up with MAT services once discharged is necessary.

Mechanism of the Positive Impacts of MAT

The theoretical foundations of art therapy remain underexplored, with art often seen as a clinical treatment, creative activity, or projective and analytical tool.^53,54 The therapeutic process involves the creative interaction between the client and the therapist,⁵⁵ utilizing art as a non-verbal medium to gain insight into individuals’ inner worlds. Mandala art therapy, as a drawing language, emphasizes the expression of inner emotions and feelings, allowing individuals to forget past negative experiences and focus on the present.⁵⁶

Music progressive relaxation served to relax participants, divert mental focus from unpleasant experiences, and concentrate on the MAT. Tailored MAT programs, based on 3 different themes (“stress relief,” “strength and seeking support,” and “future and hope”), addressed the psychological needs of gynecological cancer patients during the perioperative period. Subthemes like “safe place” aimed at providing a sense of security, while “people I adore” encouraged seeking strength and support, fostering coping strategies with postoperative pain. Meaning-focused strategy is developed as an essential coping strategy during particularly stressful events,⁵⁷ by which individuals try to search for the meaning of life and re-establish personal resources. The MAT program represented a progressive process, gradually increasing internal strength and reducing external disturbances. Psychological disorders related to fear of cancer, death, organ loss, and treatment uncertainty were addressed through nonverbal cues and metaphors in the creative process.

Limitations

Despite the promising findings, the study has limitations. The study design, lacking randomization, might introduce selection bias as participants’ willingness and acceptance of the MAT program influenced group assignment. While this approach aimed to improve compliance and reduce withdrawal rates, it may limit the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, this study was conducted in a single university hospital, limiting the generalizability of our results. The relatively small sample size (126 patients) might impact the statistical power and the ability to detect smaller effect sizes. Additionally, the non-blinding of participants and study staff introduces the potential for performance bias. While blinding in behavioral interventions can be challenging,⁵⁸ efforts to blind outcome assessors could minimize assessment bias.

Conclusion

This study contributes valuable insights into the potential benefits of the MAT program for enhancing the psychological well-being of gynecological cancer patients during the perioperative period. The findings suggest that the MAT program, implemented by a trained team of clinical nurses, may offer a promising avenue for addressing perioperative anxiety, stress, and physiological responses. While the non-randomized design and single-center focus introduce certain limitations, the high adherence rate among participants in the MAT group underscores a positive acceptance of this complementary therapeutic approach. As this study offers a preliminary understanding of the positive effects, there is room for further investigation into the optimal frequency and duration of MAT sessions to maximize its therapeutic impact.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the women for participating in this study and all the nurses in the gynecological ward who delivered the intervention (Jiang Shasha, Tan Yan, and Hou Xinnan). We appreciate Prof. Chen Canrui from Guangzhou Medical University for his guidance on the research protocol of this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: ZMQ, LX, HY, RJH; Design: ZMQ, LX, HY, RJH; Investigation: ZMQ, LX; Data management and analysis: ZMQ, LX; Manuscript first draft preparation: ZMQ, LX; Supervision and Manuscript Revision: HY, RJH. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

The data from this study are available from the corresponding author.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Zhang Mengqin

References

Sung

Ferlay

Siegel

, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660

World Health Organization. All cancers. 2020. Accessed Dec 1, 2023. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/160-china-fact-sheets.pdf

Tang

Yan

, et al. Determinants of suicidal ideation in gynecological cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2016;25:97-103. doi:10.1002/pon.3880

Mawardika

Afiyanti

Rahmah

Gynecological cancer inpatients need more supportive nursing care than outpatients: a comparative study. BMC Nurs. 2019;18:28. doi:10.1186/s12912-019-0355-x

Seland

Skrede

Lindemann

, et al. Distress, problems and unmet rehabilitation needs after treatment for gynecological cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101:313-322. doi:10.1111/aogs.14310

Hertrampf

R-S

Wärja

The effect of creative arts therapy and arts medicine on psychological outcomes in women with breast or gynecological cancer: a systematic review of arts-based interventions. Arts Psychotherapy. 2017;56:93-110. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2017.08.001

Wang

Shi

, et al. Depression and anxiety in relation to cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Mol Psychiatry. 2020;25:1487-1499. doi:10.1038/s41380-019-0595-x

Jian

Yan

, et al. Coping, mood and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in Chinese patients with advanced lung cancer. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e023672. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023672

Collette

Sola

Bonfill

, et al. Art therapy in advanced cancer. a mapping review of the evidence. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24:1715-1730. doi:10.1007/s11912-022-01321-0

10.

Zhou

, et al. The effects of art therapy on quality of life and psychosomatic symptoms in adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23:434. doi:10.1186/s12906-023-04258-4

11.

Zhang

Liu

Huang

Does mandala art improve psychological well-being in patients? a systematic review. J Integr Complement Med. 2023;30:25-31. doi:10.1089/jicm.2022.0780

12.

Yakar

Yilmaz

Ozkol

, et al. Effects of art-based mandala intervention on distress and anxiety in cancer patients. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021;43:101331. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101331

13.

Czamanski-Cohen

Wiley

JFP

Sela

, et al. The role of emotional processing in art therapy (REPAT) for breast cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019;37:586-598. doi:10.1080/07347332.2019.1590491

14.

Akbulak

Can

Effectiveness of mandala coloring in reducing anxiety in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy for the first time. Explore (NY). 2023;19:42-47. doi:10.1016/j.explore.2022.04.007

15.

Gürcan

Atay Turan

The effectiveness of mandala drawing in reducing psychological symptoms, anxiety and depression in hospitalised adolescents with cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021;30:e13491. doi:10.1111/ecc.13491

16.

Chen

Gao

YH.

The Road of Mind: Mandala Growing and Healing Picture Book. Jinan University Press; 2014.

17.

Spielberger

CD.

Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.

18.

Qian

MY.

Revision of the state-trait anxiety inventory with sample of Chinese college students. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis. 1995;1:108-112. doi:10.13209/j.0479-8023.1995.014

19.

Liu

Chen

, et al. Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Chinese Mandarin version State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y form in Taiwanese outpatients with anxiety disorders. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013;20:499-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2012.01945.x

20.

Bann

Parker

Grobman

, et al. Psychometric properties of stress and anxiety measures among nulliparous women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:53-62. doi:10.1080/0167482x.2016.1252910

21.

Ortuño-Sierra

García-Velasco

Inchausti

, et al. New approaches on the study of the psychometric properties of the STAI. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2016;44:83-92.

22.

Mitchell

Crane

Kim

Perceived stress in survivors of suicide: psychometric properties of the Perceived Stress Scale. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31:576-585. doi:10.1002/nur.20284

23.

Lesage

Berjot

Validity of occupational stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2011;61:434-436. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqr037

24.

Lesage

Chamoux

Berjot

Stability of the visual analogue scale in stress assessment. Arch Mal Prof Enviro. 2009;70:619-622.

25.

Lesage

Berjot

Deschamps

Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2012;62:600-605. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqs140

26.

Gebhart

Buchberger

Klotz

, et al. Distraction-focused interventions on examination stress in nursing students: effects on psychological stress and biomarker levels. A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020;26:e12788. doi:10.1111/ijn.12788

27.

Rosamond

Giarratano

Orlando

, et al. Healing touch: a strategy for acute care nurses' stress reduction. J Holist Nurs. 2023;41:347-359.

28.

Herth

Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs. 1992;17:1251-1259. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x

29.

Zhao

Wang

Social support and hope of hemodialysis patients. Chin J Nurs 2000;35:306-308.

30.

Chan

, et al. Herth hope index: psychometric testing of the Chinese version. J Adv Nurs. Sep 2012;68:2079-2085. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05887.x

31.

Liu

Zhang

, et al. Fear of cancer recurrence and hope level in patients receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a study on the mediating role of social support. Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:9453-9460. doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07318-6

32.

Nikoloudi

Tsilika

Parpa

, et al. Herth hope index: a psychometric evaluation study within a sample of greek patients with cancer. Indian J Palliat Care. 2021;27:367-374. doi:10.25259/ijpc_364_20

33.

Sharif Nia

Moshtagh

Khoshnavay Fomani

, et al. The Persian version of herth hope index in Iranian patients with cancer: a psychometric study. Palliat Support Care. Published online Jun 23, 2022. doi:10.1017/s1478951522000736

34.

Zhong

Weng

FG.

The development of self-acceptance questionnaire and the test of its reliability and validity. Chin J Behav Med & Brain Sci. 1999;8:20-22.

35.

Zhou

, et al. Relationships between dispositional mindfulness, self-acceptance, perceived stress, and psychological symptoms in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2017;26:2157-2161. doi:10.1002/pon.4437

36.

Zhou

Short report: the mediator effect of meaning in life in the relationship between self-acceptance and psychological wellbeing among gastrointestinal cancer patients. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24:725-731. doi:10.1080/13548506.2018.1554252

37.

Carlsson

. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983;16:87-101. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-x

38.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175-191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146

39.

Gürcan

Atay Turan

The experiences of adolescents receiving cancer treatment in Turkey: a qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020;29:e13239. doi:10.1111/ecc.13239

40.

Choi

Hahm

Jeon

, et al. The effects of mindfulness-based mandala coloring, made in nature, on chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain: randomized trial. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:642. doi:10.3390/healthcare9060642

41.

Barati

Sarchahi

Khaniki

, et al. Effect of software-based therapeutic coloring on stress and anxiety in patients with multiple sclerosis: a quasi-experimental study. Rom J Neur. 2020;19:262-267. doi:10.37897/RJN.2020.4.7

42.

Connell

Something Understood: Art Therapy in Cancer Care. Wrexham Publications; 1998.

43.

Thurston

Rewak

Kubzansky

LD.

An anxious heart: anxiety and the onset of cardiovascular diseases. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;55:524-537. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2013.03.007

44.

Friedman

BH.

An autonomic flexibility-neurovisceral integration model of anxiety and cardiac vagal tone. Biol Psychol. 2007;74:185-199. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.009

45.

Nairn

Whotton

Marshal

, et al. The patient experience in emergency departments: a review of the literature. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004;12:159-165. doi:10.1016/j.aaen.2004.04.001

46.

Maner

Schmidt

NB.

The role of risk avoidance in anxiety. Behav Ther. 2006;37:181-189. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2005.11.003

47.

Boker

Brownell

Donen

The Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale provides a simple and reliable measure of preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49:792-798. doi:10.1007/bf03017410

48.

Pinto

McIntyre

Nogueira-Silva

, et al. Risk factors for persistent postsurgical pain in women undergoing hysterectomy due to benign causes: a prospective predictive study. J Pain. 2012;13:1045-1057. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.07.014

49.

Williams

Alexander

Morin

, et al. Preoperative anxiety as a predictor of mortality and major morbidity in patients aged >70 years undergoing cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111:137-142. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.060

50.

Kim

Choe

, et al. Effects of mandala art therapy on subjective well-being, resilience, and hope in psychiatric inpatients. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;32:167-173. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2017.08.008

51.

Joly

Pasquier

Levy

, et al. Impact of creative art therapy on fatigue and quality of life in patients treated for localized breast cancer: a randomized study. Psychooncology. 2022;31:1412-1419. doi:10.1002/pon.5940

52.

Schneider

Armbrust

Spies

, et al. Prehabilitation programs and ERAS protocols in gynecological oncology: a comprehensive review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:315-326. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05321-7

53.

Huss

“A coat of many colors”: towards an integrative multilayered model of art therapy. Arts Psychotherapy. 2009;36:154-160. doi:10.1016/j.aip.2009.01.003.

54.

Schaverien

Transference and Countertransference. The Revealing Image: Analytical Art Psychotherapy in Theory and Practice. Tavistock/Routledge, 1992.

55.

Edwards

Art Therapy. Sage; 2004.

56.

Fincher

Johnson

Creating Mandalas: For Insight, Healing, and Self-Expression. Shambhala; 1991.

57.

Van den

Hewstone

Schut

HAW

, et al. The Scope of Social Psychology: Theory and Applications. Psychology Press; 2007.

58.

Grant

Pedersen

Osilla

, et al. It is time to develop appropriate tools for assessing minimal clinically important differences, performance bias and quality of evidence in reviews of behavioral interventions. Addiction. 2016;111:1533-1535. doi:10.1111/add.13380

Does Mandala Art Therapy Improve Psychological Well-Being of Gynecological Cancer Patients During the Perioperative Period? A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

Procedure

Methods

Formation of the mandala art therapy team

Development of the mandala art therapy protocol

Implementation of intervention and control

Outcome Assessment

The state-trait anxiety inventory-state scale (STAI-S)

The visual analog scale for stress (VASS)

Herth hope index (HHI)

Self-acceptance questionnaire (SAQ)

Pain intensity and satisfaction with MAT

Perceived waiting time

Statistical Analysis

Results

Patients Characteristics

Anxiety, Stress, and Vital Signs Changes During Interventions

Pain Intensity, Perceived Waiting Time, and Satisfaction with MAT

Hope and Self-acceptance Outcomes

Discussion

Positive Effects of the MAT on Perioperative Anxiety, Stress, and Vital Signs

Impact of MAT on Perceived Waiting Time, Hope and Self-Acceptance

Mechanism of the Positive Impacts of MAT

Limitations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Author Contributions

Data Availability Statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References