Are Supplemental Branched-Chain Amino Acids Beneficial During the Oncological Peri-Operative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background:

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs; leucine, isoleucine, and valine) are essential amino acids involved in immune responses, and may have roles in protein malnutrition and sarcopenia. Furthermore, certain liver diseases have been associated with a decreased Fischer’s ratio (BCAAs to aromatic amino acids; phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan). We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BCAAs use in patients with cancer undergoing surgery.

Methods:

MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched (inception to July 24, 2020) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies in English evaluating BCAAs (alone or in combinations) during the oncological peri-operative period. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal were done in duplicate. RCT risk-of-bias was appraised using Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, and observational studies’ quality assessment was conducted with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate.

Results:

20 articles were included comprising 13 RCTs and 6 observational cohort studies in 7 reports and 2019 total participants overall. Among 13 RCTs, 77% involved liver cancer. Methodological study quality scored substantial risk-of-bias across most RCTs. Meta-analysis of RCTs found a 38% decreased risk of post-operative infections in BCAAs group compared to controls (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.87; P = .006; number of RCTs, k = 6; total sample size, N = 389; I² = 0%). BCAAs were also found to be beneficial for ascites (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.86; P = .008; k = 4; N = 296; I² = 0%), body weight (MD = 3.24 kg; 95% CI = 0.44 to 6.04; P = .02; k = 3; N = 196; I² = 24%), and hospitalization length (MD = −2.07 days; 95% CI = −3.97 to −0.17; P = .03; k = 5; N = 362; I² = 59%). No differences were found between BCAAs and controls for mortality, recurrence, other post-operative complications (liver failure, edema, pleural effusion), blood loss, quality of life, ammonia level, and prothrombin time. No serious adverse events were related to BCAAs; however, serious adverse events were reported due to intravenous catheters. No safety concerns from observational studies were identified.

Conclusions:

Branched-chain amino acids during the oncological surgical period demonstrated promise in reducing important post-operative morbidity from infections and ascites compared to controls. Blinded, placebo-controlled confirmatory trials of higher methodological quality are warranted, especially using oral, short-term BCAAs-enriched supplements within the context of recent ERAS programs.

PROSPERO registration:

CRD42018086168.

Keywords

cancer surgery branched-chain amino acids leucine isoleucine valine nutritional supplements liver post-operative complications enhanced recovery after surgery

Introduction and Background

Advanced malignant disease paired with persistent physiologic stress from surgery can lead to systemic catabolism. A catabolic state induced by disease and surgery may cause malnutrition and weight loss. This phenomenon is commonly observed in both patients with cancer and those undergoing surgery with an estimated >50% of hospitalized surgical patients having or being at risk for malnutrition, and >50% of patients with cancer experiencing weight loss.^1,2 Furthermore, these issues are epitomized most severely in certain subgroups of patients, such as those with liver disease who are more often in a hypercatabolic state. Liver cirrhosis is a common underlying condition among most patients with hepatocellular carcinoma due to the high rate of carrier status of hepatitis B surface antigen.³ Liver cirrhosis is associated with an increase in basal energy expenditure, and this may be related to increased sympathetic nervous system activity, decreased glycogen stores, and impaired glycogenolysis.⁴ Malnutrition is prevalent among cirrhotic patients, and negatively affects prognosis.⁵ Liver cirrhosis is often associated with increased protein breakdown in the body and also a decreased protein synthesis response following a meal.⁶ In addition, protein-energy malnutrition has been found to be common among patients with end-stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation.⁴

The branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) leucine, isoleucine and valine are essential amino acids in humans, meaning that an exogenous intake is required for normal cellular function.¹ BCAAs are essential substrates for maintenance of protein synthesis and they are also important regulators of protein turnover.⁷ Additionally, the requirement for BCAAs often increases as a result of certain disease states, such as is observed in patients with liver disease.⁸ A number of studies have explored the utility of BCAAs and examined multiple possible mechanisms of action, including in liver diseases, and these may elucidate the rationale for their potential use in oncological surgery. A selection of these studies is briefly outlined here, and they suggest that BCAAs’ effects are multifactorial and are suggestive of complex effects in various body systems and pathology.

BCAAs were shown to improve immune system responses in several cell culture and animal feeding studies by facilitating protein synthesis and enhancing lymphocyte function.⁹ In cirrhotic patients, BCAAs improved the phagocytic function of neutrophils and natural killer cell activity.^10,11 Moreover, a study on chemically-induced cirrhotic rats found that BCAAs had stimulatory effects on the local immune systems of the liver.¹² The immunoregulatory effects of BCAAs may be a result of activating myeloid dendritic cell function, as was demonstrated in 2 ex vivo studies with cirrhotic patients.^13,14

BCAAs have also been shown to be crucial for regulating protein metabolism and play a key role in protein synthesis, acting as precursors in the replenishment of alanine and glutamine that are depleted in catabolic states such as prolonged surgical stress and advanced malignant disease.¹ In a chemically-induced rat model of liver injury, BCAAs-enriched nutrients stimulated antioxidant DNA repair.¹⁵ And in a study of food-deprived rats, leucine was unique among the BCAAs in its ability to stimulate protein synthesis in muscle.¹⁶ Furthermore, BCAAs circumvent metabolism by the liver, so they are available in the circulation for protein synthesis, which is advantageous in patients with compromised liver function.¹⁷

There has been a long debate on the usefulness of BCAAs supplementation in patients with liver cirrhosis due to inconsistent results.¹⁸ Advanced cirrhosis is often accompanied by alterations in amino acid metabolism resulting in low plasma levels of BCAAs, whereas the molar concentrations of aromatic amino acids (i.e., phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan) and methionine are high, resulting in a decreased “‘Fischer’s ratio.”^19
-23 Therefore, BCAAs administration might correct this imbalance and confer benefits.^6,24,25 In addition to some of the potential effects in cirrhosis already noted above, 2 studies in cirrhotic patients found that BCAAs improved cerebral circulation.^26,27

A Cochrane review of 16 randomized trials concluded that BCAAs have a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy.²⁸ The hypothesis for this effect is that BCAAs compete with aromatic amino acids (AAAs) to cross the blood-brain barrier, and they may facilitate ammonia detoxification.^7,29 One in vivo and 2 in vitro studies with cirrhotic rats found that BCAAs promote albumin synthesis in the liver, likely due to a normalization of the low Fischer’s (BCAAs/AAAs) ratio and via mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signal transduction.^23,30,31 Finally, preclinical studies have also found that BCAAs may have a role in liver regeneration. Two controlled studies on partially hepatectomized rats showed favourable effects on liver repair with BCAAs administration.^32,33 It has been suggested that BCAAs’ effects on liver regeneration are related to their effect on protein synthesis (along with an inhibitory effect on proteolysis), stimulation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) secretion, and glutamine production.^7,34 Inconsistent results have also been observed regarding possible adverse effects from long-term, high-dose, or excessive BCAAs use, particularly in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholism, diabetes, epilepsy, and certain cancers such as pancreatic, ovarian, and breast.^35
-41

The wide array and complexity of this literature suggests a need to summarize and critically assess the evidence to inform healthcare providers, researchers and patients. To our knowledge, a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence from human controlled studies on the supplemental use of BCAAs during the oncology peri-operative period has not been published. Our objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the adjunctive use of BCAAs in patients with cancer undergoing surgery by conducting a rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Protocol details were registered a priori on the PROSPERO website (CRD42018086168). This systematic review was conducted following the main guidelines advised by the Cochrane Collaboration.⁴² The report was written following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidance.⁴³ This project is part of a large endeavour to prepare a suite of 10 systematic reviews that was based on a prioritization exercise⁴⁴ conducted by our institute to refine our research agenda in which preliminary scoping research mapped target evidence points from systematic reviews of the integrative oncology literature.⁴⁵ The current report describes the BCAAs stream of this larger research agenda.

The study inclusion criteria (PICOS) for this systematic review were: patients undergoing cancer-related surgery, and evaluating branched-chain amino acids (i.e., leucine, isoleucine, and/or valine), using any route of administration, dose, duration, and formulation (i.e., used alone or in combinations), compared to placebo, active control, or no adjunctive treatment (e.g., usual care, standard nutrition). The primary outcomes of the review were: mortality, cancer treatment response, recurrence, remission, metastasis/disease progression, and stable disease. Secondary outcomes of interest were: adverse events, post-operative infections and other post-operative complications (i.e., ascites/edema/pleural effusion, liver failure/flapping tremor/encephalopathy, ammonia and albumin levels, and prothrombin time), bleeding, length of hospitalization, quality of life/performance status, wound healing, pain, weight/body mass index (BMI)/arm and waist circumferences, fatigue, and cancer biomarkers (e.g., PSA, CEA, AFP, etc.), immune cells, and inflammatory markers levels. Eligible study designs were differentiated between assessing efficacy outcomes and safety signals. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included for evaluation of efficacy. For only the safety evaluation, a broader evidence base was synthesized of RCTs, non-randomized and quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials, controlled observational cohort and case-control studies. Both published and unpublished reports were eligible. Exclusion criteria were studies with concomitant chemotherapy, radiation or radiofrequency ablation, and non-English reports.

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for English language records without date limits. The search was initially executed on April 6, 2018 and subsequently 2 update searches were conducted on August 14, 2019 and then on July 24, 2020. The literature search was peer reviewed by an expert librarian (JM) using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) checklist.⁴⁶ The MEDLINE search strategy is available in Supplemental Appendix 1. A supplemental gray literature search was also conducted of the clinicaltrials.gov trials registry, the Natural Medicine (formerly Natural Standard) database, and Health Canada’s Natural Health Product Monographs. In addition, the reference lists of all included studies along with of related systematic reviews were scanned for other potentially relevant studies.

Study selection and data extraction were done independently in duplicate. Discrepancies were resolved by a third person or consensus. Screening of titles/abstracts and full-text articles and data extraction were conducted after pilot calibration exercises with the review team. Data items collected into a pre-specified MS Excel form included: study characteristics (study design, sample size, follow-up time, funding source, country, year of publication, etc.), patient characteristics (cancer type/site, cancer stage/severity, age, sex, concomitant therapies, etc.), intervention details (substance, dose, duration, timing around surgery, route of administration, comparator, etc.), and data on relevant outcomes, including variance measures.

Risk-of-bias (ROB) was appraised for RCTs using the original Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool,^47,48 and quality assessment of observational studies was conducted with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.⁴⁹ This stage of the systematic review was done in duplicate after pilot testing, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus or a third person.

Results were first synthesised descriptively and evidence summary tables created. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible and appropriate using STATA 12.⁵⁰ Heterogeneity was first assessed clinically and methodologically, and then statistically with the I² measure of inconsistency and the P-value of the Chi² test. A random effects model was employed when there was substantial heterogeneity, a fixed effects model was used for low heterogeneity, and moderate heterogeneity was dealt with following guidance from Cochrane and the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS Working Group X).^42,51 The main meta-analysis results were presented graphically using forest plots. The summary effect measures used were relative risk (RR) for binary outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. When appropriate, missing measures of variance were derived or imputed following methods advised by the Cochrane Handbook.⁴² Studies with “all-zero” results in all relevant study arms were not included in the meta-analysis for that outcome (i.e., when no events of interest were observed). Zero events in 1 arm were replaced with a fixed value (i.e., 0.5) for the meta-analysis based on accepted methods.^42,51 Pre-specified possible subgroup analyses were not feasible due to the limited number of studies in each meta-analysis.⁴² Publication bias was explored with visualisation for funnel plot asymmetry, created using Review Manager 5 (RevMan5.4.1).^42,52

Results

Included Studies

The literature search for the overarching project of 10 natural health products (NHPs) produced 4171 total records after duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening, 404 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The reasons for study exclusions are described in the study flow diagram in Figure 1. A total of 276 studies were included in the larger project, with 20 relevant BCAAs articles included here reporting on 19 studies. These comprised 13 RCTs^53
-65 and 6 observational cohort studies in 7 reports^66
-72 on BCAAs, and included 2019 total participants overall across the studies.

Figure 1.

Study flow diagram.

Tables 1 and 2 report the study and patient characteristics of the included RCTs and observational cohort studies, respectively. Tables 3 and 4 outline details of the interventions and comparators utilized in the RCTs and observational cohort studies, respectively. Table 5 presents summary characteristics across all studies. The RCTs were published from 1984 to 2016, with 7 (54%) since 2010. All except 1 were conducted in Asia, and 62% of the RCTs were from Japan. Five of the RCTs (38%) did not report funding source, while 5 were publicly funded. Six RCTs (46%) had sample sizes <50, while the largest 3 had 145, 124, and 96 total randomized participants.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Included RCTs.

Study Author, Year (Study period)	Country	Funding	Sample size*	Surgical period of BCAAs exposure	Post-op BCAAs initiation timing^†	Cancer types	Cancer/ disease severity	Age (y, var.)	Female (%)	Adjunct tx
Beppu et al., 2015 (2011–2013)⁵³	Japan	NR	30	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma (most); also intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal liver mets	Child-Pugh classes A and B	NR (range 47–83)	32	NR
Bonau et al., 1984^‡ (NR)⁵⁴	USA	mixed private & public	19	Post-operative	1 day after	bladder cancer	stage I	63.5 (SE 1.6)	0	¹⁵N glycine (100%)
Fan et al., 1994 (1990–1993)⁵⁵	Hong Kong	private	124	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma	TNM stages I-VI B (most II & III)^§	54 (range 28–79)	12	cefotaxime (100%); albumin (100%)
Ichikawa et al., 2013 (2007–2012)⁵⁶	Japan	public	56	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma	solitary tumour	65 (NR)	32	NR
Ishikawa et al., 2010 (2006–2007)⁵⁷	Japan	NR	24	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic liver tumor	most did not have mets	62 (range 35–78)	42	NR
Kikuchi et al., 2016 (2011–2014)⁵⁸	Japan	public	77	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma	all 4 stages of HCC	NR (range 48–80)	22	antibiotics (100%)
Meng et al., 1999 (1994–1998)⁵⁹	Hong Kong	private	44	Post-operative	7 days after	hepatocellular carcinoma	Child-Pugh gradings A and B (most A)	53 (NR)	16	NR
Nagasue, 1997 (1988–1994)⁶⁰	Japan	NR	145	Post-operative	2–3 weeks after	hepatocellular carcinoma	all stages (most I & II)	NR (range: most 50–70)	17	NR
Okabayashi et al., 2010 (2007–2008)⁶¹	Japan	public	26	Pre-operative	NA	hepatocellular carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of liver	Child-Pugh classes A (81%) and B; no distant mets	66 (NR)	35	NR
Okabayashi et al., 2011 (2007–2009)⁶²	Japan	public	96	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of liver	Child-Pugh classes A (71%) and B; no distant mets	67 (NR)	29	diabetes meds (30%)
Sun et al., 2008 (2004–2005)⁶³	Taiwan	NR	64	Post-operative	immediate	colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancer	UICC stages I-III	65 (NR)	31	NR
Togo et al., 2005 (1999–2003)⁵³	Japan	NR	43	Post-operative	2–3 weeks after	primary hepatocellular carcinoma	TNM stages 1–4A (most stage 2)	66 (NR)	21	NR
Wu et al., 2015 (2014)⁶⁵	China	public	61	Intra-operative	NA	gastrointestinal tumor	NR	56 (range 18–68)	42	intestinal antibacterial drugs (100%)

Abbreviations: BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; meds, medications; mets, metastasis; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; TNM, tumor node metastasis; tx, treatment; UICC, Union for International Cancer Control; var, variance; y, year.

Number randomized.

†

Denotes how long after surgery the BCAAs were started.

‡

One arm was not randomized so that comparator was not included.

According to Liver Cancer Study group of Japan.

Table 2.

Characteristics of Included Observational Studies.

Study Author, Year (Study period)	Country	Funding	Sample size	Surgical period of BCAAs exposure	Post-op BCAAs initiation timing*	Cancer types	Cancer/ disease severity	Age (y, var.)	Female (%)	Adjunct tx
Ardito et al., 2020 (2016–2018)^{† 66}	Italy	NR	374	Mixed periods	continuous	Hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic disease in the liver, cholangiocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer	NR	NR	NR	NR
Huang et al., 2014 (2008–2009)⁶⁷	Taiwan	NR	61	Post-operative	1 day	colorectal cancer	stages 0, I & II	67 (NR)	44	NR
Nakajima et al., 2019 (2014–2017)⁶⁸	Japan	none	152	Pre-operative	NA	Majority biliary tract cancer. Also pancreatic cancer, HCC, other HPB cancers	All cancer stages	69 (range 60–76)	32	NR
Nanno et al., 2019 (2008–2016)⁶⁹	Japan	none	275	Pre-operative	NA	Most HCC. Also cholangio-carcinoma, metastatic liver tumor, other liver disease	Majority were Child-Pugh grade A	63 (NR)	25	antimicrobial (100%), operative vasopressor (20%), intraoperative insulin (12%)
Okabayashi et al., 2008a^‡ (2000–2007)⁷⁰	Japan	NR	112	Mixed periods	continuous	hepatocellular carcinoma	Majority were Child-Pugh class A (>80%); also class B	67.2 (range 50–86)	25	NR
Shirabe et al., 2011 (1996–2010)⁷²	Japan	NR	236	Pre-operative	NA	hepatocellular carcinoma	all undergoing liver transplant; 59% Child-Pugh class C	52 (NR)	46	tacrolimus (68%), cyclosporine A (32%), renal replacement tx (8%)

Abbreviations: BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HPB, hepato-pancreato-biliary; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; tx, treatment; var, variance; y, year.

Denotes how long after surgery the BCAA was started.

†

Only the 2 ERAS groups were included (not the pre-ERAS comparisons).

‡

Companion report is Okabayashi, 2008b.⁷¹

Table 3.

Interventions and Comparators Evaluated in the RCTs.

Study Author, Year	Group/ Brand name	Ingredients & Comparators & Dose per unit	Dosage frequency	Route of admin	Tx duration Pre-op	Tx duration Post-op	Tx duration TOTAL
Beppu et al., 2015⁵³	Livact granules	4 g of BCAAs (L-isoleucine 952 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, L-valine 1144 mg) per packet	BID	oral	46	180	116 days (median)
Beppu et al., 2015⁵³	Control	no added tx
Bonau et al., 1984⁵⁴	45% BCAA-enriched low-leucine TPN + dextrose	45% BCAAs (low-leucine formula containing leucine 22 mmol/L, isoleucine 90 mmol/L, and valine 140 mmol/L), delivering a total of 30 Cal/kg/day and 1.5 g/kg/day of protein	per day	IV	NA	7	7 days
	Aminosyn 7% (standard TPN) + dextrose	25% BCAAs (leucine 50 mmol/L, isoleucine 39 mmol/L, and valine 48 mmol/L), delivering a total of 30 Cal/kg/day and 1.5 g/kg/day of protein	per day	IV	NA	7	7 days
	5% Dextrose in water	D5W, 150 g/day in 3 L	per day	IV	NA	7	7 days
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs combination PN solution	35% BCAAs + MCTs, other lipids, dextrose, vitamins & trace minerals; and 25 g/day albumin; and usual diet. 1.5 g/kg/day of AAs. Total volume limited to 1.75 L/day, providing 30 Cal/kg/day	per day	IV	7	7	14 days
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	Control	Pre-op was usual diet. Post-op was 5% Dextrose and normal saline; and 25 g/day albumin; and usual diet. Total volume & sodium were equal to that in the PN group	per day	IV	7	7	14 days
Ichikawa et al., 2013⁵⁶	Livact granules	4.74 g packets containing 4 g of BCAAs, specifically L-valine (1144 mg), L-leucine (1904 mg), and L-isoleucine (952 mg), and carbohydrates	TID	oral	0.5	6	6.5 months
Ichikawa et al., 2013⁵⁶	Control	Conventional diet adjusted to match total caloric intake
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	Aminoleban EN	BCAAs	BID	oral	14	7	21 days
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	Control	no added tx
Kikuchi et al., 2016⁵⁸	Livact granules	BCAAs, 4.74 g	TID	oral	1	12	13 months
Kikuchi et al., 2016⁵⁸	Control	no added tx
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Aminoleban EN	Each packet contains valine (1.6 g), leucine (2.0 g) and isoleucine (1.9 g), complemented with other amino acids, various minerals and 14 types of vitamins. It also comprises 6.5 g of gelatin hydrolysate, 3.5 g of rice oil and 31 g of dextrin	TID	oral	NA	12	12 weeks
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Control	Conventional diet adjusted to match total protein (80 g) and caloric intake
Nagasue, 1997⁶⁰	Aminoleban EN	50 g. High amounts of BCAAs, small amounts of other AAs, 10 minerals & 14 vitamins. Total daily dose provided 27 g protein (13 g as peptides, 13 g as AAs & 1 g as casein), 62 g dextrin & 7 g rice oil (420 Cal)	BID	oral	NA	12	12 months
Nagasue, 1997⁶⁰	Control	no added tx
Okabayashi et al., 2010⁶¹	Aminolevan EN	50 g combination of BCAAs + other NHPs. Total daily dose provided 13 g of free AAs, 13 g of gelatin hydrolysate, 1 g of casein, 62 g carbohydrates, 7 g lipids, and glycyrrhizin and other components (420 Cal)	BID	oral	2	NA	2 weeks
Okabayashi et al., 2010⁶¹	Control	Conventional diet adjusted to match total caloric intake
Okabayashi et al., 2011⁶²	Aminoleban EN	50 g combination of BCAAs + other NHPs. Total daily dose provided 13 g of free AAs, 13 g of gelatin hydrolysate, 1 g of casein, 62 g carbohydrates, 7 g lipids, and glycyrrhizin and other components (420 Cal)	BID	oral	0.5	6	6.5 months
Okabayashi et al., 2011⁶²	Control	Conventional diet adjusted to match total caloric intake
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Amiparen 10% (BCAAs-enriched TPN)	BCAAs 30% of total amino acids. 30 Cal/kg per day composed of 1.4 g/kg per day AAs + 1.0 g/kg per day fat with remaining calories administered with 50% glucose	per day	IV	NA	6	6 days
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Aminosyn 10% (standard TPN)	BCAAs 24% of total amino acids. 30 Cal/kg per day composed of 1.4 g/kg per day AAs + 1.0 g/kg per day fat with remaining calories administered with 50% glucose	per day	IV	NA	6	6 days
Togo et al., 2005⁶⁴	Livact granules	4 g of BCAAs (L-isoleucine 952 mg, L-leucine 1904 mg, L-valine 1144 mg) per packet	TID	oral	NA	12	12 months
Togo et al., 2005⁶⁴	Control	no added tx
Wu et al., 2015⁶⁵	BCAAs	39 g (mean)	NA	IV	NA	NA	Intra-operative
	Aminoplasmal (4% AAs solution in NS)	38 g (mean)	NA	IV	NA	NA	Intra-operative
	Control	Normal saline	NA	IV	NA	NA	Intra-operative

Abbreviations: AAs, amino acids; admin, administration; BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; BID, twice per day; D5W, 5% dextrose in water; IV, intravenous; MCTs, medium-chain triglycerides; NA, not applicable; NHPs, natural health products; NS, normal saline; PN, parenteral nutrition; Post-op, post-operatively; Pre-op, pre-operatively; TID, 3 times per day; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; tx, treatment.

Table 4.

Exposures and Comparators Evaluated in the Observational Studies.

Study Author, Year	Group/ Brand name	Ingredients & Comparators & Dose per unit	Dosage frequency	Route of admin	Tx duration Pre-op	Tx duration Post-op	Tx duration TOTAL
Ardito et al., 2020*⁶⁶	ERAS + BCAAs + personalized diet	ERAS + 1 g BCAAs (500 mg leucine, 250 mg isoleucine & 250 mg valine) + personalized diet	TID	oral	14	30	44 days
Ardito et al., 2020*⁶⁶	ERAS program	Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program (including the avoidance of pre-operative fasting, with maltodextrins & clear liquids allowed until 2 hours before surgery)
Huang et al., 2014⁶⁷	high-dose BCAAs + fat	80 g AAs providing 24 g BCAAs (10% Amiparen) + 50 g fat (Lipofundin MCT/LCT) + dextrose + electrolytes; 2850 ml; 1239 Cal	per day	IV	NA	7	7 days
	low-dose BCAAs + fat	40 g AAs providing 12 g BCAAs (10% Amiparen) + 50 g fat (Lipofundin MCT/LCT) + dextrose + electrolytes; 2450 ml; 1079 Cal	per day	IV	NA	7	7 days
	traditional fluid management	Dextrose (155 g) + electrolytes (Velip & Taita No. 5); 2300 ml; 527 Cal	per day	IV	NA	7	7 days
Nakajima et al., 2019⁶⁸	Exercise + BCAAs + Vitamin D	6 g AAs providing 3.6 g BCAAs (Amino L40) + 1600 IU vitamin D. Exercise therapy comprised 60 min. of home-based, unsupervised exercise at least 3 times/week, combining moderate aerobic exercise and resistance training.	3x per week	oral	32 (median)	NA	32 days (median)
Nakajima et al., 2019⁶⁸	no prehabilitation	no added tx
Nanno et al., 2019⁶⁹	AminoValue	4 g BCAAs (1 g valine, 2 g leucine & 1 g isoleucine)	once	oral	1	NA	1 day
Nanno et al., 2019⁶⁹	no added tx	no added tx
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷⁰ & Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷¹	Aminoleban EN	50 g of mixture providing 6.5 g free AAs, 6.5 g gelatin hydrolysate, 0.5 g casein, 31 g carbohydrate, 3.5 g lipid, glycyrrhizin, & other components; producing 210 Cal	BID	oral	0.5	6	6.5 months
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷⁰ & Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷¹	no added tx	no added tx
Shirabe et al., 2011⁷²	BCAAs	2/3 patients took Livact (12 g BCAAs). 1/3 patients took Aminoleban EN (50–150 g of mixture; details above).	per day	oral	>1	NA	>1 month
Shirabe et al., 2011⁷²	no added tx	no added tx

Abbreviations: AAs, amino acids; admin, administration; BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; BID, twice per day; IV, intravenous; LCT, long-chain triglycerides; MCT, medium-chain triglycerides; NA, not applicable; Post-op, post-operatively; Pre-op, pre-operatively; TID, 3 times per day; tx, treatment.

Only the 2 ERAS groups were included (not the pre-ERAS comparisons).

Table 5.

Summary Characteristics of Included Studies.

Characteristic	RCTs (13)		Observational (6)
Characteristic	No.	%	No.	%
Year of publication
1984–1999	4	31	0	0
2000–2009	2	15	1	17
2010–2020	7	54	5	83
Country
Japan	8	62	4	67
China, Taiwan, Hong Kong	4	31	1	17
USA	1	8	0	0
Italy	0	0	1	17
Cancer types
Liver	10	77	4	67
Gastrointestinal	2	15	1	17
Bladder	1	8	0	0
Biliary tract	0	0	1	17
Surgical period of BCAAs use
Pre-operative only	1	8	3	50
Intra-operative only	1	8	0	0
Post-operative only	5	38	1	17
Mixed periods	6	46	2	33
BCAAs route of administration
Oral	9	69	5	83
Intravenous	4	31	1	17
Age (y, mean/median)
52–59	3	23	1	17
60–69	7	54	4	67
Not reported	3	23	1	17
Female (%)
0–19	4	31	0	0
20–29	3	23	2	33
30–46	6	46	3	50
Not reported	0	0	1	17
Funding
Public	5	38	0	0
Private	2	15	0	0
Mixed	1	8	0	0
None	0	0	2	33
Not reported	5	38	4	67
Sample size
19–49	6	46	0	0
50–99	5	38	1	17
100–152	2	15	2	33
153–374	0	0	3	50

The large majority of the RCTs dealt with liver cancer (10/13, 77%), 2 were on gastrointestinal cancer,^63,65 and 1 on bladder cancer.⁵⁴ Mean (or median) ages of the study populations were from 53 to 67 years old, and all of the RCTs had a predominantly male population. Nine RCTs (69%) evaluated oral intake of BCAAs and 4 (31%) administered (parenteral) BCAAs intravenously in hospital. Duration of treatment use in the RCTs ranged from intra-operatively (single intravenous administration) up to a maximum duration of 13 months (oral administration). Forty-six percent (6/13) evaluated BCAAs administration during both the pre-operative and post-operative periods, while 5 RCTs (39%) gave BCAAs only post-operatively.

Risk-of-Bias and Methodological Quality

Figure 2 presents the RCT risk-of-bias assessments per study using the Cochrane tool, and Figure 3 reports the aggregate summary across RCTs. The methodological quality appraisals revealed an overall substantial risk-of-bias across most of the included studies. Ten (77%) of the RCTs were judged to possess a high risk-of-bias for at least 1 domain among the 7 assessment elements. The other 3 (23%) RCTs^58,63,64 had an unclear risk-of-bias for at least 1 domain, while they scored a low risk-of-bias on 4 or more domains.

Figure 2.

Risk-of-bias appraisal of each RCT.

Figure 3.

Aggregate risk-of-bias across studies.

The risk-of-bias element that scored worst among the (10/13) RCTs was selective reporting (Figure 3). Most of the RCTs did not report on allocation concealment and random sequence generation, suggesting potential selection bias. The majority of the studies were unclear or high risk regarding blinding of participants and personnel and blinded outcome assessment, indicating performance and detection biases. Additionally, 4 of the 13 (31%) RCTs scored high/unclear risk for incomplete outcome data, suggesting possible attrition bias.

Table 6 presents the quality assessment of the observational cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Overall, these were of low methodological quality. In particular, the “comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis” item was inadequate in the majority (4/6; 67%) of studies that did not control for important potential confounding. Two (33%) observational studies^66,68 used propensity score matching, and both of these studies received higher NOS scores of 7 out of 9 total stars.

Table 6.

NOS Quality Assessment of Observational Cohort Studies.

Study Author, Year	Selection	Comparability	Outcome
Ardito et al., 2020⁶⁶	★★★★	★	★★
Huang et al., 2014⁶⁷	★★★★		★★
Nakajima et al., 2019⁶⁸	★★★★	★★	★
Nanno et al., 2019⁶⁹	★★★★		★★
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷⁰	★★★★		★
Shirabe et al., 2011⁷²	★★★★		★

Mortality and Recurrence

Comprehensive tables of outcome results per study from the RCTs and observational cohort studies are reported in the journal’s online Supplemental Appendices 2 and 4, respectively.

Supplemental Table S2.1 describes the RCT results per study for mortality data. This outcome was evaluated in 9 (69%) of the included RCTs. Follow-up times varied substantially from 1 week to 4 years. Three RCTs reported no deaths, so 6 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Figure 4 displays the forest plot of the meta-analysis. There was low statistical heterogeneity between studies (I² = 0%) in the mortality outcome, and a fixed effects model was utilized. There was no evidence of a difference between the BCAAs and control groups for mortality (number of studies, k = 6; total sample size, N = 497; RR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.34; P = .92).

Figure 4.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on mortality.

Supplemental Table S2.2 presents the results on cancer recurrence, which was reported in 5 RCTs. Follow-up times varied from 12 to 36 months. Figure 5 provides the forest plot of the meta-analysis. There was moderate statistical heterogeneity between studies (I² = 39%) in this outcome, and a fixed effects model was utilized. There was no evidence of a difference between the BCAAs and control groups for recurrence (k = 5; N = 371; RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.07; P = .15). Similar results were also found with a random effects model (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on recurrence.

None of the included RCTs specifically reported extractable data on the following other primary outcomes of the review: cancer treatment response, metastasis, remission, and stable disease.

Liver Failure

Outcome measures of liver failure, including post-operative encephalopathy and flapping tremor, were reported in 4 RCTs (Supplemental Table S2.3). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 1.4 years. One RCT had no events, and another⁶⁰ reported the percentage change from baseline in flapping tremor at 12 months was borderline significant (P = .047) favouring BCAAs compared to usual care. The other 2 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis of post-operative liver failure. There was low statistical heterogeneity (I² = 22%), and a fixed effects model was utilized. There was no evidence of a difference between the BCAAs and control groups for liver failure (k = 2; N = 121; RR = 1.22; 95% CI, 0.39 to 3.76; P = .73).

Post-Operative Infections

Table 7 below presents the RCT results for all post-operative infections, which were reported on in 7 RCTs. Study follow-up times varied from 7 to 513 days. Infections reported included: wound infection, sepsis, biliary fistula (septic), central-catheter sepsis, infected ascites, post-operative pulmonary infection, post-operative subphrenic abscess, urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, liver abscess, infectious complications, chest infection, intra-abdominal abscess, and pneumonia.

Table 7.

Post-Operative Infections (RCTs).

Study Author, Year	Tx Name	Sample size	No. of infections	Follow-up time	Name of outcome
Bonau et al., 1984⁵⁴	45% BCAAs-enriched low-leucine TPN + dextrose	6	0	8 days	wound infection
	25% BCAAs standard TPN (Aminosyn 7%) + dextrose	9	0	8 days	wound infection
	5% Dextrose in water	4	0	8 days	wound infection
Bonau et al., 1984⁵⁴	45% BCAAs-enriched low-leucine TPN + dextrose	6	0	8 days	sepsis
	25% BCAAs standard TPN (Aminosyn 7%) + dextrose	9	0	8 days	sepsis
	5% Dextrose in water	4	0	8 days	sepsis
Fan et al., 1994*⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	4	NR	biliary fistula (septic)
Fan et al., 1994*⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	5	NR	biliary fistula (septic)
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	1	NR	central-catheter sepsis^†
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	0	NR	central-catheter sepsis^†
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	1	NR	infected ascites
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	2	NR	infected ascites
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	5	NR	post-op pulmonary infection^‡
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	15	NR	post-op pulmonary infection^‡
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	4	NR	post-op subphrenic abscess^§
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	5	NR	post-op subphrenic abscess^§
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	3	NR	post-op wound infection^¶
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	5	NR	post-op wound infection^¶
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	0	NR	urinary tract infection
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	2	NR	urinary tract infection
Ichikawa et al., 2013⁵⁶	BCAAs	26	2	NR	surgical site infection
Ichikawa et al., 2013⁵⁶	no added tx	30	3	NR	surgical site infection
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	BCAAs	11	0	7 days	liver abscess
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	no added tx	13	1	7 days	liver abscess
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	BCAAs	11	0	7 days	wound infection
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	no added tx	13	1	7 days	wound infection
Kikuchi et al., 2016⁵⁸	BCAAs	39	5	NR	infectious complications
Kikuchi et al., 2016⁵⁸	no added tx	38	4	NR	infectious complications
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Aminoleban EN	21	1	512 days^#	chest infection
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	no added tx	23	2	513 days^#	chest infection
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Aminoleban EN	21	3	512 days	infected ascites
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	no added tx	23	1	513 days	infected ascites
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Aminoleban EN	21	0	512 days	urinary tract infection
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	no added tx	23	1	513 days	urinary tract infection
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Aminoleban EN	21	4	512 days	wound infection
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	no added tx	23	5	513 days	wound infection
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Amiparen 10% (enriched TPN, 30% BCAAs)	32	0	30 days	intra-abdominal abscess
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Aminosyn 10% (standard TPN, 24% BCAAs)	32	1	30 days	intra-abdominal abscess
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Amiparen 10% (enriched TPN, 30% BCAAs)	32	1	30 days	pneumonia
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Aminosyn 10% (standard TPN, 24% BCAAs)	32	2	30 days	pneumonia
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Amiparen 10% (enriched TPN, 30% BCAAs)	32	1	30 days	urinary tract infection
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Aminosyn 10% (standard TPN, 24% BCAAs)	32	1	30 days	urinary tract infection
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Amiparen 10% (enriched TPN, 30% BCAAs)	32	1	30 days	wound infection
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Aminosyn 10% (standard TPN, 24% BCAAs)	32	2	30 days	wound infection

Abbreviations: BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; No., number; NR, not reported; PN, parenteral nutrition; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; tx, treatment.

Number of patients with infections was 11 (BCAAs) versus 22 (Control) total since some had multiple infections.

†

Defined as positive culture of the catheter tip in the presence of a febrile episode.

‡

Defined as presence of pneumonic or atelectatic changes on radiographs associated with a positive sputum culture.

Defined as a collection of pus with or without necrotic material associated with a positive bacterial culture.

Defined as erythema and induration of a wound associated with purulent discharge that was positive on bacterial culture.

Median value.

One study reported no infections, so the remaining 6 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Figure 6 presents the forest plot of the meta-analysis. There was low statistical heterogeneity between studies (I² = 0%), and a fixed effects model was utilized. The BCAAs group had a 38% decreased risk of post-operative infections compared to controls (k = 6; N = 389; RR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87; P = .006).

Figure 6.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on post-operative infections.

Ascites, Pleural Effusion, and Edema

Ascites, pleural effusion, and edema results were reported in 5, 4, and 2 RCTs, respectively (Supplemental Table S2.4). Follow-up times varied from 7 to 513 days across these studies. One RCT⁶⁴ had 1 case of post-operative edema at 12 months in the BCAAs group compared to none in the controls (P > .05), and the other study⁶⁰ reported no change from baseline in edema in both groups.

One RCT,⁶⁰ which only reported percentage change from baseline, found ascites within the first 3 months was significantly less common in the BCAAs group compared to usual care (P < .0001), however, this effect was not statistically significant during the remainder of the 12-month follow-up. The other 4 RCTs were able to be included in a meta-analysis, and these all included patients with liver cancer. Figure 7 provides the forest plot for ascites, which had low statistical heterogeneity between studies (I² = 0%) so a fixed effects model was utilized. The BCAAs group had a 45% decreased risk of ascites compared to controls (k = 4; N = 296; RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.86; P = .008).

Figure 7.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on ascites.

The meta-analysis for pleural effusion had low statistical heterogeneity between the RCTs (I² = 0%) and a fixed effects model was run (Supplemental Appendix Figure S3.1). There was no evidence of a difference between the BCAAs and control groups for pleural effusion (k = 4; N = 269; RR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.18; P = .21).

Hospitalization Length

Supplemental Table S2.5 presents the RCT results on the length of stay in hospital, which was reported in 5 of the included RCTs. Figure 8 provides the forest plot of the meta-analysis. There was substantial heterogeneity between studies (I² = 59%) and a random effects model was employed. Hospital length of stay was found to be 2 days shorter in the BCAAs group compared to controls (k = 5; N = 362; MD = −2.07 days; 95% CI, −3.97 to −0.17; P = .03).

Figure 8.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on hospital length of stay.

Quality of Life

Supplemental Table S2.6 reports results of 2 RCTs that reported on quality of life measures. One study⁶⁰ using the Karnovsky scale found the percentage change from baseline in the rate of performance status ≤70 at 12 months was borderline significant (P = .047) in favour of the BCAAs group compared to usual care. The other RCT,⁶² which used the SF-36 health survey, only reported on intra-group changes compared to their pre-operative scores (not between group differences). At the 12 month follow-up time point, the control group had no significant change in any of the 8 parameters, while in the BCAAs group all parameters improved significantly compared to baseline.

Anthropometrics

Supplemental Table S2.7 presents the RCT anthropometric measurements results reported across 6 RCTs in total. Follow-up times ranged from 1 week to 1 year. All 6 RCTs reported on body weight, and 4 of them additionally presented results for arm circumference, BMI, and triceps skin-fold thickness outcomes. Three of the RCTs^54,55,60 were not feasible for inclusion in the body weight meta-analysis (due to outcome measure or variance reporting). Two of these RCTs^55,60 found the BCAAs group had significantly greater body weight compared to controls, while one study⁵⁴ reported there was no difference found between groups (Table S2.7). Figure 9 presents the forest plot of the meta-analysis on body weight. There was low statistical heterogeneity (I² = 24%), and a fixed effects model was utilized. Body weight was 3 kg greater in the BCAAs group compared to controls (k = 3; N = 196; MD = 3.24 kg; 95% CI, 0.44 to 6.04; P = .02).

Figure 9.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on body weight.

Immune Cells and Inflammatory Markers

Supplemental Table S2.8 presents the RCT results for the immune cells and inflammatory markers outcomes, which were reported on in 2 RCTs. Follow-up times were from 7 to 15 days. One study⁵⁵ found no difference between groups for serum IgA, IgG, or IgM levels (P > .05). The other RCT⁶³ reported significant improvements in C-reactive protein levels (P = .004) and WBC counts (P = .002) in the BCAAs group compared to controls.

Ammonia Level and Prothrombin Time

Supplemental Table S2.9 presents ammonia level results reported in 2 RCTs. Supplemental Appendix Figure S3.2 provides the forest plot of the meta-analysis. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 0%) and a fixed effects model was used. There was no evidence of a difference between the BCAAs and control groups for ammonia level (k = 2; N = 156; MD = 1.61 mcg/dL; 95% CI, −6.24 to 9.47; P = .69).

Supplemental Table S2.10 reports the results for prothrombin time, which was reported in one study.⁵⁸ This RCT found there was no difference between groups (P > .05).

Blood Loss

Supplemental Table S2.11 lists the surgical blood loss data from 6 RCTs after BCAAs administration. Figure 10 presents the forest plot of the meta-analysis. There was high heterogeneity between studies (I² = 83%), therefore a random effects model was employed. No evidence of a difference was found between the BCAAs and control groups for peri-operative blood loss (k = 6; N = 383; MD = 208.34 ml; 95% CI, −107.76 to 524.44; P = .20). These inconsistent results also included 1 outlier study⁵⁵ of surgeries performed in the early 1990s that used a multi-component formulation including IV lipids, vitamins, etc. (Table 3).

Figure 10.

Forest plot of RCTs meta-analysis on blood loss.

Other Complications and Adverse Events

Table 8 presents the RCT results per study for other post-operative complications not already reported on above and adverse events. One RCT⁵⁵ reported 2 (3%) adverse events related to the use of nutritional intravenous catheters implanted in the superior vena cava, 1 each of pre-operative catheter sepsis and of a badly positioned catheter pre-operatively.

Table 8.

Other Complications and Adverse Events (RCTs).

Study Author, Year	Tx name	Sample size	Follow-up time	OC/AE #1 name (definition) – N	OC/AE #2 name (definition) – N	OC/AE #3 name (definition) – N	OC/AE #s 4-9 name (definition) – N
Beppu et al., 2015⁵³	BCAAs	7	6 months	Complications in hepatic resection (definition NR) – 4
Beppu et al., 2015⁵³	no added tx	10	6 months	Complications in hepatic resection (definition NR) – 3
Bonau et al., 1984⁵⁴	45% BCAAs-enriched low-leucine TPN + dextrose	6	8 days	NR
	Aminosyn 7% (standard TPN) + dextrose	9	8 days	NR
	5% Dextrose in water	4	8 days	NR
Fan et al., 1994⁵⁵	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	NR	Hyperglycemia & diuresis post-operative related to nutritional therapy in the absence of a history of diabetes mellitus (definition NR) – 2	Catheter sepsis pre-operative (related to nutritional IV catheter) (Positive culture of the catheter tip in the presence of a febrile episode) – 1	Badly positioned catheter pre-operative (related to nutritional IV catheter) (definition NR) – 1
	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	NR	NR	NR	NR
	BCAAs-enriched PN	64	NR	Bleeding (intraabdominal, variceal, peptic ulcer) (definition NR) – 6	Wound dehiscence (definition NR) – 1	Myocardial infarction (definition NR) – 0	Intestinal obstruction (definition NR) – 1
	5% Dextrose + normal saline	60	NR	Bleeding (intraabdominal, variceal, peptic ulcer) (definition NR) – 3	Wound dehiscence (definition NR) – 1	Myocardial infarction (definition NR) – 3	Intestinal obstruction (definition NR) – 0
Ichikawa et al., 2013⁵⁶	BCAAs	26	6.5 months	Side effects of Livact (i.e., not “well tolerated”) (definition NR) – 0
Ichikawa et al., 2013⁵⁶	no added tx	30	6.5 months	NR
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	BCAAs	11	21 days	NR
Ishikawa et al., 2010⁵⁷	no added tx	13	21 days	NR
Kikuchi et al., 2016⁵⁸	BCAAs	39	1 year	Total post-operative complications (morbidity) (Complications were defined as any deviation from an uneventful post-operative course, and assessment of complications followed a standardized complication classification system, Clavien–Dindo grades) – 12
Kikuchi et al., 2016⁵⁸	no added tx	38	1 year	Total post-operative complications (morbidity) (Complications were defined as any deviation from an uneventful post-operative course, and assessment of complications followed a standardized complication classification system, Clavien–Dindo grades) – 17
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	Aminoleban EN	21	12 weeks	Adverse reactions associated with Aminoleban EN (i.e., not “significant” adverse reactions) (definition NR) – 3*	Haemorrhage (“Major” complication) – 4^†	Biliary fistula (“Major” complication) – 1	Fever (“Minor” complication) – 9
Meng et al., 1999⁵⁹	no added tx	23	12 weeks	NR	Haemorrhage (“Major” complication) – 2	Biliary fistula (“Major” complication) – 4	Fever (“Minor” complication) – 7
Nagasue, 1997⁶⁰	Aminoleban EN	67	12 months	Adverse reactions to the BCAAs (definition NR) – 7
Nagasue, 1997⁶⁰	no added tx	65	12 months	NR
Okabayashi et al., 2010⁶¹	Aminolevan EN	13	2 weeks	Side effects of Aminolevan EN (i.e., not “well tolerated”) (definition NR) – 0
Okabayashi et al., 2010⁶¹	no added tx	13	2 weeks	NR
Okabayashi et al., 2011⁶²	Aminoleban EN	40	6.5 months	Side effects of Aminoleban EN (i.e., not “well tolerated”) (definition NR) – 0
Okabayashi et al., 2011⁶²	no added tx	36	6.5 months	NR
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Amiparen 10% (BCAAs-enriched TPN)	32	30 days	Anastomotic leakage (definition NR) – 0	Wound dehiscence (definition NR) – 0	Respiratory failure (definition NR) – 0	Ileus (definition NR) – 1
Sun et al., 2008⁶³	Aminosyn 10% (standard TPN)	32	30 days	Anastomotic leakage (definition NR) – 1	Wound dehiscence (definition NR) – 1	Respiratory failure (definition NR) – 1	Ileus (definition NR) – 2
Togo et al., 2005⁶⁴	BCAAs	21	12 months	Side effects of Livact (i.e., adverse reactions) (definition NR) – 0
Togo et al., 2005⁶⁴	no added tx	22	12 months	NR
Wu et al., 2015⁶⁵	BCAAs	20	30 days	Bowel leak after operation (definition NR) – 0
	AAs solution	21	30 days	Bowel leak after operation (definition NR) – 1
	Normal saline	20	30 days	Bowel leak after operation (definition NR) – 0

Abbreviations: AAs, amino acids; AE, adverse events; BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; IV, intravenous; N, number; NR, not reported; OC, other complications not already reported on above; PN, parenteral nutrition; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; tx, treatment.

2 patients experienced occasional diffuse abdominal pain after ingestion and 1 suffered from transient diarrhoea, which all stopped spontaneously.

†

Intervention was started 7 days after surgery in this RCT.

Regarding adverse events related to BCAAs, Fan et al.,⁵⁵ who administered a parenteral nutrition combination of amino acids, lipids, dextrose, vitamins and trace minerals, reported 2 (3%) cases of post-operative hyperglycemia and diuresis in the absence of a history of diabetes mellitus. Nagasue⁶⁰ reported that 7/67 (10%) patients experienced adverse events with the oral Aminoleban EN formula, including nausea and vomiting in 4, diarrhea in 1, abdominal distension in 1, and hypertension in 1. Three (5%) of these patients discontinued BCAAs due to side effects. Meng et al.⁵⁹ found no significant adverse reactions associated with oral Aminoleban EN, and 3 (14%) adverse events deemed by the authors as not significant, including occasional diffuse abdominal pain after ingestion and transient diarrhea, which all resolved spontaneously. Four RCTs^56,61,62,64 reported that there were no side effects to the BCAAs interventions out of 100 total patients. Six RCTs did not report on adverse events related to BCAAs.

None of the RCTs reported usable data on the secondary outcomes of fatigue, pain, general wound healing, and cancer biomarker levels. Albumin level was removed as a review outcome since in several studies it was unclear whether exogenous albumin had been administered (i.e., participant contamination) during the surgical period.

Observational Studies

Supplemental Appendix Table S4.1 includes the observational study results for mortality, which was reported on in all 6 cohort studies. There was no evidence of a safety concern regarding mortality from these observational studies.

One observational study reported on liver failure (Supplemental Table S4.2), and there was no evidence of a safety concern regarding liver failure in this cohort (P = .37).

Supplemental Table S4.3 outlines the observational study results for post-operative infections, which were reported on in 3 studies. There was no evidence of a safety concern regarding infections from the observational data.

One observational study reported on ascites (Supplemental Table S4.4). There was no evidence of a safety concern regarding ascites in this cohort.

Supplemental Table S4.5 includes the observational study results for hospitalization length, which was reported on in 4 studies. There was no evidence of a safety concern regarding hospital length of stay from these cohorts.

One observational study reported on anthropometrics (Supplemental Table S4.6), and there was no evidence of a safety concern regarding BMI.

Supplemental Table S4.7 includes the observational study results for lymphocyte counts, which were reported on in 2 studies. There was no evidence of a safety concern for lymphocyte counts.

Surgical blood loss results were reported on in the 4 observational studies presented in Supplemental Table S4.8. There was no evidence of a safety concern for blood loss from these cohorts.

Table 9 provides the observational cohort results per study for other post-operative complications not already reported on above and adverse events. None of the 6 observational studies reported on adverse events related to BCAAs. Meta-analyses of the observational studies were not feasible due to heterogeneity.

Table 9.

Table of Other Complications and Adverse Events in Observational Studies.

Study Author, Year	Tx name	Sample size	Follow-up time	OC/AE #1 name (definition) – N	OC/AE #2 name (definition) – N	OC/AE #3 name (definition) - N	OC/AE #s 4-9 name (definition) – N
Ardito et al., 2020⁶⁶	ERAS + BCAAs + personalized diet	113	NR	Severe post-operative complications, Grade ≥3 (Complications were scored according to the Clavien grading system) – 7
Ardito et al., 2020⁶⁶	ERAS program	261	NR	Severe post-operative complications, Grade ≥3 (Complications were scored according to the Clavien grading system) – 20
Huang et al., 2014⁶⁷	high-dose BCAAs + fat	21	7 days	Phlebitis (pain, tenderness, swelling, induration, erythema, warmth, and palpable cord-like veins due to inflammation, infection, and/or thrombosis during hospitalization) – 0
	low-dose BCAAs + fat	20	7 days	Phlebitis (pain, tenderness, swelling, induration, erythema, warmth, and palpable cord-like veins due to inflammation, infection, and/or thrombosis during hospitalization) – 1
	traditional fluid management	20	7 days	Phlebitis (pain, tenderness, swelling, induration, erythema, warmth, and palpable cord-like veins due to inflammation, infection, and/or thrombosis during hospitalization) – 0
Nakajima et al., 2019⁶⁸	Exercise + BCAAs + Vitamin D	76	NR	Total major post-operative complications (Severity of post-operative complications was classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. A major complication was defined as a complication with a Clavien grade ≥ 3) – 32	Bile leakage grade ≥ B (Bile leakage was defined according to the definition of ISGLS) – 8	Pancreatic fistula grade ≥ B (Post-operative pancreatic fistula was defined according to the definition of ISGPF) – 13	Delayed gastric emptying grade ≥ B (definition NR) – 7
Nakajima et al., 2019⁶⁸	no pre-habilitation	76	NR	Total major post-operative complications (Severity of post-operative complications was classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. A major complication was defined as a complication with a Clavien grade ≥ 3) – 38	Bile leakage grade ≥ B (Bile leakage was defined according to the definition of ISGLS) – 19	Pancreatic fistula grade ≥ B (Post-operative pancreatic fistula was defined according to the definition of ISGPF) – 12	Delayed gastric emptying grade ≥ B (definition NR) – 6
Nanno et al., 2019⁶⁹	AminoValue	146	NR	Grade III–IV morbidity (Post-operative morbidity was classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and grade ≥ III was considered clinically significant) – 22	Grade I–II morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III was considered clinically significant) – 43	Bile leak (definition NR) – 12
Nanno et al., 2019⁶⁹	no added tx	129	NR	Grade III–IV morbidity (Post-operative morbidity was classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and grade ≥ III was considered clinically significant) – 20	Grade I–II morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III was considered clinically significant) – 46	Bile leak (definition NR) – 14
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷⁰	Aminoleban EN	40	NR	Bile leakage (Post-operative complication; post-operative morbidities were checked by abdominal ultrasonography and/or computed tomography) – 2
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷⁰	no added tx	72	NR	Bile leakage (Post-operative complication; post-operative morbidities were checked by abdominal ultrasonography and/or computed tomography) – 9
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷¹	BCAAs	13	6.5 mos	NR
Okabayashi et al., 2008⁷¹	no added tx	28	6.5 mos	NR
Shirabe et al., 2011⁷²	BCAAs	129	90 days	NR
Shirabe et al., 2011⁷²	no added tx	107	90 days	NR

Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; BCAAs, branched-chain amino acids; ISGLS, International Study Group of Liver Surgery; ISGPF, International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula; mos, months; N, number; OC, other complications not reported on above; PN, parenteral nutrition; TPN, total parenteral nutrition; tx, treatment.

Publication Bias

Figure 11 presents the funnel plot for the largest meta-analysis outcome, post-operative infections, which contained 6 RCTs. Statistical tests for funnel plot asymmetry (e.g., Egger’s test) were not executed as this requires at least 10 studies in a meta-analysis.⁴² Visualization revealed asymmetry of the funnel plot indicating small-study effects, which may be due to publication (i.e., non-reporting) bias.⁴² Additionally, the outlying point was from a small study with a high risk-of-bias.⁵⁷

Figure 11.

Funnel plot for post-operative infections.

Discussion

This comprehensive systematic review included 20 reports comprising 2019 total participants, of which 13 RCTs were synthesized to evaluate BCAAs efficacy. Our results showed encouraging effects of BCAAs intake in patients with cancer undergoing surgery, especially regarding important surgical morbidity. The risk of post-operative infections decreased 38% (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.44 to 0.87), and there was a 45% reduction in the risk of ascites (RR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.86) compared to controls. Additionally, promising results were found for body weight (MD = 3.24 kg; 95% CI = 0.44 to 6.04) and also hospital length of stay (MD = −2.07 days; 95% CI = −3.97 to −0.17). None of the included RCTs provided data on: cancer treatment response, metastasis, remission, stable disease, fatigue, pain, general wound healing, and cancer biomarker levels. The other review outcomes did not have evidence of an effect with BCAAs use among these 13 RCTs. The methodological study quality of most of the included RCTs was at high risk-of-bias, thereby weakening the strength of the findings. Our results clearly demonstrate that further investigation of BCAAs in blinded, placebo-controlled trials is warranted.

For the safety evaluation, observational data from 6 identified comparative cohort studies were also included with the aim of providing a broader safety analysis. No BCAAs safety concerns were identified regarding the review outcomes of interest among the 20 reports. One RCT⁵⁵ reported 2 (3%) adverse events related to the use of nutritional intravenous catheters, which were implanted in the superior vena cava (catheter sepsis and badly positioned catheter). No serious adverse events were reported related to BCAAs. However, adverse events reporting was generally inadequate, with almost half (6/13) of the RCTs and all 6 observational studies not reporting on adverse events related to BCAAs. The adverse events reported related to BCAAs, or to the investigational combinations containing BCAAs, included: hyperglycemia, diuresis, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal distension, hypertension, and abdominal pain.

The strengths of this systematic review and meta-analysis include a priori protocol registration, execution of a comprehensive and up-to-date literature search, critical appraisal of study quality, application of rigorous statistical methods, and transparent reporting of the methods and results. The main review-level limitation of the methodology was the exclusion of non-English reports and not searching Asian databases, which may have introduced language bias. The main study-level limitation of the results was the overall low methodological quality of the evidence due to most of the included RCTs being at high risk-of-bias, thereby weakening the strength of the findings even though clinically relevant effect sizes were found. Additionally, funnel plot asymmetry indicated small-study effects, which may be due to publication (i.e., non-reporting) bias and the inclusion of a small study⁵⁷ with a high risk-of-bias. Furthermore, the appraisal of the observational cohort studies also revealed low methodological quality overall. Also, there was generally poor study reporting on adverse events related to BCAAs. In addition, there was substantial heterogeneity observed between the various interventions, comparators, and durations of treatment evaluated. The conduct of exploratory subgroup analyses was precluded due to potential multiplicity issues. Finally, the large majority (77%) of the RCTs were involving liver cancer.

Hospital peri-operative care has undergone significant changes over the past few years, in particular due to the gradual implementation of new Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS^©) guidelines aimed at improving recovery after major surgery and reducing hospital and societal costs.^73
-76 ERAS programs are multimodal, interdisciplinary and standardized pathways that are patient-focused and include 23 standard items for a variety of surgical specialties. In 2016, ERAS guidelines were published for liver surgery.⁷⁷ Liver cancer surgery is a challenging procedure having statistics of major morbidity of ~27% and an overall mortality risk of up to 5%.⁷⁸ Four of the ERAS topics are relevant to our BCAAs review: peri-operative nutrition, pre-operative fasting and carbohydrate load, nasogastric intubation, and post-operative nutrition and early oral intake. Specifically, these new guidelines recommend against prolonged pre-operative fasting (>6 hours for solids), allowing clear fluids up to 2 hours before surgery.⁷⁷ They also continued current guidance advice for patients at risk of malnutrition to administer 7 days of oral nutrition supplements pre-operatively.⁷⁹ In addition, the 2016 guidelines advise early oral intake of solid foods post-operatively (day 1), with oral nutritional supplementation being reserved for malnourished patients or those with prolonged fasting due to complications and preference in these cases is given to enteral over parenteral nutrition.⁷⁷ However, current clinical practice recommendations for the optimal specific types of oral nutritional supplements are unclear. Our results clearly demonstrate that short-term oral BCAAs-enriched nutritional supplements warrant further investigation within the context of recent ERAS protocols, particularly in patients at risk of malnutrition.

To our knowledge, a comprehensive and rigorously executed systematic review of evidence from human controlled studies that also includes methodological appraisal on the safety and efficacy of BCAAs intake during the oncology peri-operative period has not been published. A 2012 Cochrane systematic review of nutritional interventions before or after liver transplantation found that the use of parenteral nutrition plus BCAAs had benefits compared with standard parenteral nutrition.⁸⁰ Another Cochrane review of 16 RCTs that was published in 2017 concluded that BCAAs have a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy compared to controls.²⁸ Moreover, updated guidance from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) recommends that patients with advanced cirrhosis can use oral BCAAs long-term, and it also states that in hepatic encephalopathy BCAAs-enriched formulas can be used post-operatively when enteral nutrition is needed.⁸¹

Conclusion

The use of branched-chain amino acids during the oncological surgical period showed encouraging effects in reducing important post-operative morbidity from infections and ascites compared to controls. Furthermore, beneficial effects were also found for body weight and hospitalization length. No other effects were observed for the additional systematic review outcomes. Blinded, placebo-controlled confirmatory trials of higher methodological quality are warranted, especially using short-term oral BCAAs-enriched nutritional supplements in patients at risk of malnutrition within the context of recent ERAS programs.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-ict-10.1177_1534735421997551 – Supplemental material for Are Supplemental Branched-Chain Amino Acids Beneficial During the Oncological Peri-Operative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-ict-10.1177_1534735421997551 for Are Supplemental Branched-Chain Amino Acids Beneficial During the Oncological Peri-Operative Period: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Elise Cogo, Mohamed Elsayed, Vivian Liang, Kieran Cooley, Christilynn Guerin, Athanasios Psihogios and Peter Papadogianis in Integrative Cancer Therapies

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We wish to sincerely thank Dr. John and Mrs. Thea Patterson, Dr. Jessie McGowan, and Dr. Nancy Rawling.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Elise Cogo

Kieran Cooley

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Choudry

Pan

Karinch

Souba

WW.

Branched-chain amino acid-enriched nutritional support in surgical and cancer patients. J Nutr. 2006;136:314s-318s. doi:10.1093/jn/136.1.314S

Shpata

Prendushi

Kreka

Kola

Kurti

Ohri

Malnutrition at the time of surgery affects negatively the clinical outcome of critically ill patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Med Arch. 2014;68:263-267. doi:10.5455/medarh.2014.68.263-267

Meng

Leung

Lau

WY.

Prospective randomized control study on the effect of branched-chain amino acids in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:811-815. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01701.x

Hammad

Kaido

Uemoto

Perioperative nutritional therapy in liver transplantation. Surg Today. 2015;45:271-283. doi:10.1007/s00595-014-0842-3

Cheung

Lee

Raman

Prevalence and mechanisms of malnutrition in patients with advanced liver disease, and nutrition management strategies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:117-125. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.016

Charlton

Branched-chain amino acid enriched supplements as therapy for liver disease. J Nutr. 2006;136:295s-298s. doi:10.1093/jn/136.1.295S

Holecek

Three targets of branched-chain amino acid supplementation in the treatment of liver disease. Nutrition. 2010;26:482-490. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2009.06.027

Masuda

Shirabe

Yoshiya

, et al. Nutrition support and infections associated with hepatic resection and liver transplantation in patients with chronic liver disease. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013;37:318-326. doi:10.1177/0148607112456041

Calder

PC.

Branched-chain amino acids and immunity. J Nutr. 2006;136:288s-293s. doi:10.1093/jn/136.1.288S

10.

Nakamura

Ochiai

Imai

Moriyasu

Imawari

Restoration of innate host defense responses by oral supplementation of branched-chain amino acids in decompensated cirrhotic patients. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:1062-1067. doi:10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00166.x

11.

Nakamura

Ochiai

Imawari

Phagocytic function of neutrophils of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis is restored by oral supplementation of branched-chain amino acids. Hepatol Res. 2004;29:207-211. doi:10.1016/j.hepres.2004.04.005

12.

Tsukishiro

Shimizu

Higuchi

Watanabe

Effect of branched-chain amino acids on the composition and cytolytic activity of liver-associated lymphocytes in rats. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:849-859. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02220.x

13.

Kakazu

Ueno

Kondo

, et al. Branched chain amino acids enhance the maturation and function of myeloid dendritic cells ex vivo in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2009;50:1936-1945. doi:10.1002/hep.23248

14.

Kakazu

Kanno

Ueno

Shimosegawa

Extracellular branched-chain amino acids, especially valine, regulate maturation and function of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2007;179:7137-7146. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.7137

15.

Ichikawa

Okabayashi

Shima

, et al. Branched-chain amino acid-enriched nutrients stimulate antioxidant DNA repair in a rat model of liver injury induced by carbon tetrachloride. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:10803-10810. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1974-4

16.

Anthony

Yoshizawa

Anthony

Vary

Jefferson

Kimball

SR.

Leucine stimulates translation initiation in skeletal muscle of postabsorptive rats via a rapamycin-sensitive pathway. J Nutr. 2000;130:2413-2419. doi:10.1093/jn/130.10.2413

17.

Marchesini

Marzocchi

Noia

Bianchi

Branched-chain amino acid supplementation in patients with liver diseases. J Nutr. 2005;135:1596s-1601s. doi:10.1093/jn/135.6.1596S

18.

Henkel

Buchman

AL.

Nutritional support in patients with chronic liver disease. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;3:202-209. doi:10.1038/ncpgasthep0443

19.

Fischer

Rosen

Ebeid

James

Keane

Soeters

PB.

The effect of normalization of plasma amino acids on hepatic encephalopathy in man. Surgery. 1976;80:77-91.

20.

Soeters

Fischer

JE.

Insulin, glucagon, aminoacid imbalance, and hepatic encephalopathy. Lancet. 1976;2:880-882. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90541-9

21.

Tada

Kumada

Toyoda

, et al. Impact of the branched-chain amino acid to tyrosine ratio and branched-chain amino acid granule therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1412-1419. doi:10.1111/jgh.12954

22.

Kinny-Köster

Bartels

Becker

, et al. Plasma amino acid concentrations predict mortality in patients with end-stage liver disease. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159205

23.

Okuno

Moriwaki

Kato

Muto

Kojima

Changes in the ratio of branched-chain to aromatic amino acids affect the secretion of albumin in cultured rat hepatocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995;214:1045-1050. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.2391

24.

Tajiri

Shimizu

Branched-chain amino acids in liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7620-7629. doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7620

25.

Kaido

Mori

Ogura

, et al. Pre- and perioperative factors affecting infection after living donor liver transplantation. Nutrition. 2012;28(11-12):1104-1108. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2012.02.007

26.

Yamamoto

Iwasa

Matsumura

, et al. Improvement of regional cerebral blood flow after oral intake of branched-chain amino acids in patients with cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:6792-6799. doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i43.6792

27.

Iwasa

Matsumura

Watanabe

, et al. Improvement of regional cerebral blood flow after treatment with branched-chain amino acid solutions in patients with cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:733-737. doi:10.1097/01.meg.0000059162.46867.f0

28.

Gluud

Dam

Les

, et al. Branched-chain amino acids for people with hepatic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;5:Cd001939. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001939.pub4

29.

James

Ziparo

Jeppsson

Fischer

JE.

Hyperammonaemia, plasma aminoacid imbalance, and blood-brain aminoacid transport: a unified theory of portal-systemic encephalopathy. Lancet. 1979;2:772-775. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92119-6

30.

Matsumura

Morinaga

Fujitani

Takehana

Nishitani

Sonaka

Oral administration of branched-chain amino acids activates the mTOR signal in cirrhotic rat liver. Hepatol Res. 2005;33:27-32. doi:10.1016/j.hepres.2005.07.001

31.

Ijichi

Matsumura

Tsuji

Eto

Branched-chain amino acids promote albumin synthesis in rat primary hepatocytes through the mTOR signal transduction system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;303:59-64. doi:10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00295-x

32.

Holecek

Simek

Palicka

Zadák

Effect of glucose and branched chain amino acid (BCAA) infusion on onset of liver regeneration and plasma amino acid pattern in partially hepatectomized rats. J Hepatol. 1991;13:14-20. doi:10.1016/0168-8278(91)90857-8

33.

Rigotti

Peters

Tranberg

Fischer

JE.

Effects of amino acid infusions on liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in the rat. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1986;10:17-20. doi:10.1177/014860718601000117

34.

Tomiya

Nishikawa

Inoue

, et al. Leucine stimulates HGF production by hepatic stellate cells through mTOR pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;358:176-180. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.04.093

35.

Holeček

Branched-chain amino acid supplementation in treatment of liver cirrhosis: updated views on how to attenuate their harmful effects on cataplerosis and ammonia formation. Nutrition. 2017;41:80-85. doi:10.1016/j.nut.2017.04.003

36.

Lee

Cho

Kim

, et al. Branched-chain amino acids sustain pancreatic cancer growth by regulating lipid metabolism. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51:1-11. doi:10.1038/s12276-019-0350-z

37.

Mayers

Clish

, et al. Elevation of circulating branched-chain amino acids is an early event in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma development. Nat Med. 2014;20:1193-1198. doi:10.1038/nm.3686

38.

Nair

Short

KR.

Hormonal and signaling role of branched-chain amino acids. J Nutr. 2005;135:1547s-1552s. doi:10.1093/jn/135.6.1547S

39.

Wang

Faddaoui

Bachvarova

, et al. BCAT1 expression associates with ovarian cancer progression: possible implications in altered disease metabolism. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31522-31543. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5159

40.

Ananieva

Wilkinson

AC.

Branched-chain amino acid metabolism in cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2018;21:64-70. doi:10.1097/mco.0000000000000430

41.

Nie

Zhang

Branched chain amino acids: beyond nutrition metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19. doi:10.3390/ijms19040954

42.

Higgins

JPT

Thomas

Chandler

, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane; 2020. www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

43.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

DG.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

44.

El-Harakeh

Lotfi

Ahmad

, et al. The implementation of prioritization exercises in the development and update of health practice guidelines: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0229249. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229249

45.

Cogo

Papadogianis

Characteristics of 218 recent reviews on natural health products in integrative cancer care: a bibliometric analysis of trends in the human research literature. J Orthomolec Med. 2018;33. https://isom.ca/volume-33-number-3-2018/

46.

McGowan

Sampson

Salzwedel

Cogo

Foerster

Lefebvre

PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-46. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021

47.

Higgins

JPT

Green

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.

48.

Higgins

Altman

Gøtzsche

, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928

49.

Wells

Shea

O’Connell

, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

50.

STATA Version 12 [Computer Program] . StataCorp LLC; 2011.

51.

Evidence Synthesis and Meta-Analysis for Drug Safety: Report of CIOMS Working Group X . Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS); 2016.

52.

Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program]. Version 5.4 . The Cochrane Collaboration; 2020.

53.

Beppu

Nitta

Hayashi

, et al. Effect of branched-chain amino acid supplementation on functional liver regeneration in patients undergoing portal vein embolization and sequential hepatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Gastroent. 2015;50:1197-1205.

54.

Bonau

Jeevanandam

Daly

JM.

High-branched chain amino acid solutions: relationship of composition to efficacy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1984;8:622-627.

55.

Fan

Lai

, et al. Perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1547-1552.

56.

Ichikawa

Okabayashi

Maeda

, et al. Oral supplementation of branched-chain amino acids reduces early recurrence after hepatic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Surg Today. 2013;43:720-726.

57.

Ishikawa

Yoshida

Mamada

, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study of short-term perioperative oral nutrition with branched chain amino acids in patients undergoing liver surgery. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57:583-590.

58.

Kikuchi

Hiroshima

Matsuo

, et al. A randomized clinical trial of preoperative administration of branched-chain amino acids to prevent postoperative ascites in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3727-3735.

59.

Meng

Leung

Lau

Meng

WC.

Prospective randomized control study on the effect of branched-chain amino acids in patients with liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:811-815.

60.

Nagasue

Long-term oral administration of branched chain amino acids after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1997;84:1525-1531.

61.

Okabayashi

Nishimori

Yamashita

, et al. Preoperative oral supplementation with carbohydrate and branched-chain amino acid-enriched nutrient improves insulin resistance in patients undergoing a hepatectomy: a randomized clinical trial using an artificial pancreas. Amino Acids. 2010;38:901-907.

62.

Okabayashi

Iyoki

Sugimoto

Kobayashi

Hanazaki

Oral supplementation with carbohydrate- and branched-chain amino acid-enriched nutrients improves postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Amino Acids. 2011;40:1213-1220.

63.

Sun

Shih

, et al. Randomized, controlled study of branched chain amino acid-enriched total parenteral nutrition in malnourished patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing surgery. Am Surg. 2008;74:237-242.

64.

Togo

Tanaka Togo

, et al. Usefulness of granular BCAA after hepatectomy for liver cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2005;21:480-486.

65.

Zhang

Yang

Xue

Intraoperative infusion of branched-chain amino acids in patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:336.

66.

Ardito

Lai

Rinninella

, et al. The impact of personalized nutritional support on postoperative outcome within the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for liver resections: results from the NutriCatt protocol. Updates Surg. 2020;72:681-691. doi:10.1007/s13304-020-00787-6

67.

Huang

Kang

, et al. Postoperative hypocaloric peripheral parenteral nutrition with branched-chain-enriched amino acids provides no better clinical advantage than fluid management in nonmalnourished colorectal cancer patients. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66:1269-1278.

68.

Nakajima

Yokoyama

Inoue

, et al. Clinical benefit of preoperative exercise and nutritional therapy for patients undergoing hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeries for malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:264-272. doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6943-2

69.

Nanno

Toyama

Terai

, et al. Preoperative oral branched-chain amino acid supplementation suppresses intraoperative and postoperative blood lactate levels in patients undergoing major hepatectomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019;43:220-225. doi:10.1002/jpen.1445

70.

Okabayashi

Nishimori

Sugimoto

, et al. Effects of branched-chain amino acids-enriched nutrient support for patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1869-1873.

71.

Okabayashi

Nishimori

Sugimoto

, et al. The benefit of the supplementation of perioperative branched-chain amino acids in patients with surgical management for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary study. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:204-209.

72.

Shirabe

Yoshimatsu

Motomura

, et al. Beneficial effects of supplementation with branched-chain amino acids on postoperative bacteremia in living donor liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:1073-1080.

73.

Gustafsson

Scott

Schwenk

, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:259-284. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0

74.

Lassen

Coolsen

Slim

, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012;31:817-830. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.011

75.

Cerantola

Valerio

Persson

, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:879-887. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014

76.

Nygren

Thacker

Carli

, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013;37:285-305. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6

77.

Melloul

Hübner

Scott

, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg. 2016;40:2425-2440. doi:10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1

78.

Dokmak

Ftériche

Borscheid

Cauchy

Farges

Belghiti

2012 liver resections in the 21st century: we are far from zero mortality. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:908-915. doi:10.1111/hpb.12069

79.

Weimann

Braga

Harsanyi

, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:224-244. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015

80.

Langer

Großmann

Fleischer

, et al. Nutritional interventions for liver-transplanted patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8:Cd007605. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007605.pub2

81.

Plauth

Bernal

Dasarathy

, et al. ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in liver disease. Clin Nutr. 2019;38:485-521. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.022

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.48 MB