The Role of Hyperthermia in the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Malignant Tumors

Abstract

Hyperthermia is often used in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer treatment. Recently, immunotherapy has become a popular research area, breaking exciting new ground with concurrent immunotherapy and hyperthermia. Much evidence has demonstrated the effectiveness of multidisciplinary synergistic therapy, and the underlying mechanism has been gradually explored. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of various cancer treatments in the current literature and recent advances in hyperthermia. Additionally, we review clinical studies of hyperthermia combined with other therapies in the previous 10 years and propose future prospects for hyperthermia in multidisciplinary synergistic therapy.

Keywords

hyperthermia multidisciplinary synergistic therapy mechanism radiotherapy chemotherapy immunotherapy

Introduction

Hyperthermia refers to the use of heat and its secondary effects produced by raising the temperature of the whole body and/or local tumor tissue to treat malignant tumors. In clinical practice, it can be used alone or in combination with other methods such as radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Hyperthermia is mainly divided into 3 categories according to the manner of administration: local, regional, and whole-body hyperthermia. Local hyperthermia is defined as increasing the temperature of local tumors and is often used for skin or natural body surface tumors, such as cervical lymph node metastases and skin tumors. Regional hyperthermia is achieved by increasing the perfusion of organs or limbs with heated liquid, such as intraperitoneal hyperthermia, which is often combined with chemotherapy, and radiofrequency in deep tumors. Whole-body hyperthermia is mostly applied to treat metastatic tumors.¹ According to different heating media, it can be divided into microwave heating therapy, infrared heating therapy, magnetic heating therapy, and photothermic therapy, among others.² Although increasing studies are focusing on the mechanism of hyperthermia, many details still remain unclear. At present, hyperthermia is widely used in the clinic, but how to achieve a more appropriate target temperature, more accurate target location, and an optimal treatment strategy remain a great challenge.

Mechanisms of Hyperthermia Alone or in Combination With Other Therapeutic Methods

Mechanisms of Hyperthermia

Hyperthermia is a therapy that consists of heating the lesion site to treat tumors based on the differential response of tumor tissue and normal tissue to heat.^3,4 Blood vessels in the tumor are different from those in normal tissues. The normal vascular system is a network of arterioles, capillaries, and veins. In contrast, tumor blood vessels assemble into a chaotic network of capillaries, most of which lack smooth muscle layer and innervation.⁵ This vascular abnormality leads to a hypoxic environment inside the tumor, and a mild temperature (37°C to 42°C) can lead to local vascular dilation and increased vascular perfusion to improve oxygenation of tumors, thus mitigating inflammation and deep tissue hyperemia, moreover reducing the excitability of pain-sensing nerves to relieve pain.³ At temperatures above 42°C, the tumor vasculature is directly damaged by increased permeability, which results in fluid and protein accumulation in the microenvironment and contributes to elevated interstitial fluid pressure, in turn leading to vessel compression and further vascular perfusion reduction. Furthermore, the mechanism responsible for the vascular injury is activated, and tumor growth and proliferation are inhibited during the heating process.⁶ In addition, when the temperature exceeds 37°C, the membrane fluidity increases, thereby affecting its permeability. Changes in the cytoskeleton and membrane structure can destroy the tumor cell movement, intracellular signal transduction, and further inhibit tumor growth and metastasis.⁷

Mechanisms of Hyperthermia Combined With Chemotherapy

The combination of hyperthermia and chemotherapy agents can lead to an overall enhancement of drug cytotoxicity. An artificial increase in tissue temperature can lead to higher fluidity of the bilayer of phospholipids in tumor cells, which in turn facilitates their drug permeability.⁸ Moreover, the structure of the cell membrane changes, the membrane viscosity decreases, and cellular uptake of drugs rises in cancer tissue.^9,10 Studies have demonstrated that hyperthermia (43°C) has a synergistic interaction with cisplatin (cPt) on cell growth inhibition, probably because it can modulate the function of the cPt transporter Ctr1, leading to increased cPt uptake with enhanced cytotoxicity.^11-13 Carboplatin and oxaliplatin show only additive effects. Based on the above-mentioned mechanisms, regional chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia has been developed, such as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy (HIVEC) of the bladder, in which heated chemotherapy agents are perfused into the abdominal cavity or bladder to exert antitumor effects by increasing their thermodynamic effects.^14,15

Mechanisms of Hyperthermia Combined With Radiotherapy

Hyperthermia increases the sensitivity of tumor cells to ionizing radiation. First, it is well known that hypoxia is related to radioresistance, and improvement of the hypoxic environment of tumor tissues can lead to increased radiosensitivity of tumors. This phenomenon can be attributed to the ability of hyperthermia to reoxidize hypoxic tumor cells by increasing blood flow, so that tumor cells lose the protection of the hypoxic environment during RT. Only an appropriate temperature can improve oxygenation and vascular perfusion of tumors, resulting in radiosensitization. In contrast, a high temperature will reduce blood perfusion, damage blood vessels, and aggravate cell hypoxia, which is associated with decreased radiosensitivity.¹⁰ Changes in protein structure caused by heat can affect multiple components of cells to varying degrees, thus suppressing DNA damage repair.¹⁶ Hyperthermia induces heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 synthesis and thus interferes with telomere activity. Overexpression of telomerase in tumor cells can stabilize telomeres and prolong the life of cells. Therefore, hyperthermia indirectly inhibits the activity of telomerase and promotes cancer cell apoptosis.¹⁷ The sensitivity of tumor cells to ionizing radiation is influenced by their phases of the cell cycle. G0 and S phase cells are less sensitive to RT injury but more sensitive to hyperthermia.^18,19 Furthermore, RT can reduce the thermal tolerance of tumor cells and improve the curative effect of hyperthermia.

Mechanisms of Hyperthermia Combined With Immunotherapy

Studies have also revealed the role of temperature in facilitating the efficacy of immunotherapy. Accumulating evidence indicates that the immunosuppressive state of the tumor microenvironment is supported by hypoxia within tumors.^20-22 Using the potential ability of heat to modulate reoxygenation of the targeted tumor site plays a fundamental role when coupled with immunotherapy. Furthermore, an elevated temperature can not only induce the immune response at the targeted tumor site, but it can also stimulate an antitumor response throughout the body.

There is a growing appreciation that mild hyperthermia has an effect on the functions of innate immune cells. Previous studies have revealed that macrophages can be activated by mild heat through Hsp-mediated enhanced expression of various signaling pathways and oxides, as well as the direct immunogenic influence of mild hyperthermia.^23,24 For dendritic cells (DCs), which present antigens to adaptive immune cells, hyperthermia can enhance their proliferation, maturation, and antigen presentation.^25-30 Moreover, natural killer cells are activated and show elevated cytotoxicity and recruitment to tumor sites on heating, causing increased tumor cell recognition by natural killer cells.^31,32 Adaptive immune cells can also be targeted by heat. Hsp70 activates T-cells by inducing CD69, interferon-γ, and tumor necrosis factor-α, whereas Hsp90 and Hsp27 play an important role in antigen presentation among T-cells and DCs, and can serve to activate antitumor immune responses.^33-36 The proliferation and activation of B-cells may be enhanced after exposure to elevated temperatures by activating the extracellular signal-regulated kinase and nuclear factor-κβ signaling pathways and inducing heat-shock transcription factor 1 expression.^37-40

During an immune response, lymphocytes and leukocytes infiltrate the tissue and interact with DCs after activation of innate immune cells. Several investigations have revealed a barrier to CD8+ T-cell infiltration in tumor sites. Hyperthermia can increase the trafficking of immune cells across the tumor vascular barrier to access the tumor and immune organs.^41-44 This process probably occurs through elevated integrin- and selectin-mediated adhesion, stable binding to intercellular adhesion molecule-1, as well as increased endothelial cell activation and permeability.^45,46

Clinical Use of Hyperthermia

In the 18th century, doctors found that tumors began to shrink when cancer patients suffered from febrile diseases. Thereafter, research on hyperthermia for tumor treatment never stopped. In the past few decades, hyperthermia has played a benign role in the treatment of multiple cancers, such as head and neck, breast, brain, bladder, rectum, lung, skin and accessory, ovary, various types of sarcomas, and other tumors.

Hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy and RT changed the original single treatment mode and broke through its limitations, thus enhancing the therapeutic effect and becoming a ray of dawn for tumor treatments.^2,47-53 For different tumors, the specific treatment methods and curative effects are also different. In this article, we review the clinical trials and case reports of hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy, RT, chemoradiotherapy, and immunotherapy over the most recent 10 years (Table 1), and we discuss and summarize the results of these existing trials to provide new ideas for clinical practice.

Table 1.

Published Trials of Hyperthermia Combined With Other Therapies.

Author (Year)	Site	Study Type	Study Design	Patients (N)	Clinical Benefit (%)	P	Local Control	Overall Survival
Issels et al⁵² (2010)	Soft tissue sarcoma	Phase III randomized	EIA plus regional HT	169	84.7%	.002	66% (4 years)	59% (4 years)
Issels et al⁵² (2010)	Soft tissue sarcoma	Phase III randomized	EIA	172	70.6%	.002	55% (4 years)	57% (4 years)
Klimanov et al⁵⁷ (2018)	Breast cancer	Retrospective	CT plus RIMH	53	75.5%	—	—	—
Klimanov et al⁵⁷ (2018)	Breast cancer	Retrospective	CT	50	42%	—	—	—
van der Zee et al⁵⁰ (2000)	Pelvic tumors	Prospective, randomized	RT plus HT	182	55% (CR)	<.001	38% (3 years)	30% (3 years)
	Pelvic tumors		RT	176	39% (CR)	<.001	26% (3 years)	24% (3 years)
	Cervical cancer		RT plus HT	58	83% (CR)	.003	61% (3 years)	51% (3 years)
	Cervical cancer		RT	56	57% (CR)	.003	41% (3 years)	27% (3 years)
Huilgol et al⁷¹ (2010)	Head and neck (nonmetastatic)	Prospective randomized	EBRT plus HT	28	78.6% (pCR)	<.05	—	245 days
Huilgol et al⁷¹ (2010)	Head and neck (nonmetastatic)	Prospective randomized	EBRT	26	42.4% (pCR)	<.05	—	141 days
Wittlinger et al⁷⁴ (2009)	Bladder cancer (T1,T2)	Phase II trial	RCT plus RHT	45	96% (pCR)	—	85% (3 years)	80% (3 years)
Schroeder et al⁷⁵ (2012)	Rectal cancer	Retrospective	RCT plus RHT	61	16.4% (pCR)	—	The rate of sphincter-sparing surgery (low-lying tumors located within 8 cm of the anal verge): 57% in no-HT group vs 35% no-HT group
Schroeder et al⁷⁵ (2012)	Rectal cancer	Retrospective	RCT	45	6.7% (pCR)	—
Tsuchiya et al⁸³ (2012)	Pancreatic cancer	Phase II study	CT plus HT	18	61.1%	—	—	33% (1 year), 17.7 m
Mittal BB et al⁸⁷ (1996)	Metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma	Pilot phase I/II study	131I anti-CEA RMoAb and hyperthermia	6	—	—	—	—

Abbreviations: EIA, etoposide, ifosfamide, adriamycin; HT, hyperthermia; CT, chemotherapy; RIMH, regional inductive moderate hyperthermia; RT, radiotherapy; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; pCR, pathological complete response; RCT, radiochemotherapy; RHT, regional deep hyperthermia.

Hyperthermia Combined With Chemotherapy

Hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy is widely used in clinical practice and has been widely studied in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In a retrospective study, 61 cases of high-grade STS patients were included, among whom 28 received preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and 33 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus hyperthermia (HCT). Hyperthermia aiming at a target temperature of 42°C was usually conducted on the first and third days of chemotherapy for 60 minutes, with isocyclophosphamide applied during or immediately after local hyperthermia. There were no significant differences in tumor response between the 2 groups (P = .67), whereas for toxic reactions, postoperative wound dehiscence and complications in the CRT group were markedly higher than in the HCT group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), local control, and freedom from distant metastases over 2 years between the 2 groups.^54,55

In a more recent trial, the prospectively randomized NCT 00003052 phase III multicenter trial, 341 patients with untreated localized high-risk STS were enrolled, of whom 169 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of etoposide, ifosfamide, and adriamycin (EIA) plus regional hyperthermia, and the remainder received EIA alone. After induction therapy, the tumor response was evaluated by imaging, and the best local treatment (surgery and/or RT) was selected, followed by another 4 cycles of induction therapy. Regional hyperthermia was performed on the first and fourth days of each chemotherapy cycle at a target temperature of 42°C for 60 minutes. The relative hazard for local progression or death between patients receiving combined therapy versus EIA alone was 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.84; P = .003), with an absolute difference at 2 years of 15% (95% CI = 6% to 26%; 76% vs 61%). Among them, 169 patients with nonextremity tumor showed a more noteworthy benefit from regional hyperthermia. In the safety evaluation, the combined treatment group did not show an increased incidence of adverse reactions of chemotherapy. Therefore, this trial demonstrated that local hyperthermia could improve the efficacy of chemotherapy for high-risk localized STS.⁵² In addition, subgroup analysis revealed a greater benefit in the patients who underwent surgical resection.⁵⁶ Despite some problems in the above-mentioned clinical trials, for example, the combined treatment group received more chemotherapy than the chemotherapy alone group; this is the first phase III clinical trial to investigate whether chemotherapy combined with hyperthermia or chemotherapy alone is more effective in patients with STS. To some extent, the results have indicated that the combination of hyperthermia and other therapies is a good therapeutic strategy, but the timing of hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy and the method of hyperthermia require further experimental study.

Regional inductive moderate hyperthermia in combination with chemotherapy can improve the therapeutic effect of breast cancer patients with multiple liver metastases.⁵⁷ The MegaTherm apparatus was set in the metastatic lesion to generate electromagnetic irradiation, with a temperature less than 40°C lasting for 30 minutes. The magnetic field generated during regional inductive moderate hyperthermia can significantly accelerate the interaction between chemical molecular oxygen and cellular metabolites, leading to remarkably enhanced oxidative stress in tumors and their microenvironments and increased apoptosis induced by hyperthermia.^58,59

For advanced ovarian and colorectal cancers, extensive peritoneal metastasis is often a sign of a poor prognosis. Among these patients, peritoneal recurrence is a major problem. Owing to the high selectivity of intraperitoneal administration and the pharmacokinetic characteristics of local chemotherapy, a positive effect of HIPEC on the survival of patients with advanced ovarian and colorectal cancer has been reported with increasing frequency.^60,61 HIPEC is a local treatment to clean the abdominal cavity with hyperthermic chemotherapeutic drugs, which is based on the direct cytotoxicity of heat to cancer cells and the indirect increase in the toxicity of anticancer drugs. Moreover, HIPEC must be combined with complete surgical resection of peritoneal cancers.⁶² There is increasing evidence that HIPEC is beneficial for the prognosis of ovarian peritoneal metastasis. In a multicenter retrospective study, 56 cases of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients who were treated with cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC were included. The median follow-up time was 23.1 months. The median OS and progression-free survival were 25.7 months (95% CI = 20.3-31.0) and 10.8 months (95% CI = 5.4-16.2), respectively. The 5-year OS and progression-free survival were 23% and 7%, respectively.⁶³ Nevertheless, the median survival rate was 11.2 months, and the 3-year survival rate was 18% in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who received cytoreductive surgery alone.⁶⁴ For patients with advanced ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastasis, the combination therapy can be beneficial for a wider subset of patients than conventional secondary debulking surgery alone. Nonetheless, these data should be further evaluated in randomized clinical trials due to the limitations of the research program design and the small sample size.

Therefore, regional hyperthermia is often used in combination with chemotherapy, generally not alone, in patients with advanced nonoperative tumors. Regional hyperthermia is usually given on the first and last day of the chemotherapy cycle for 60 minutes at 40°C to 42°C.

Hyperthermia Combined With Radiotherapy

Hyperthermia alone or combined with RT has special significance in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Evidence has shown that hyperthermia can improve the survival and reduce toxicity in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.^65-67 In 2000, the Lancet published a Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Group trial, which was designed to treat locally advanced pelvic tumors with RT alone or combined with hyperthermia. Hyperthermia was prescribed 1 to 4 hours after RT once weekly, for a total of 5 times. Treatment was continued for 60 minutes after the tumor reached 42°C, usually up to 90 minutes. This multicenter phase III trial showed that the 3-year survival rate nearly doubled from 27% to 51% in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer after combining RT with hyperthermia.⁵⁰ Therefore, for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, the combination of hyperthermia and RT should be considered to improve the therapeutic effect. Not only does the temperature of the hyperthermia contribute to the effectiveness of the treatment, but the timing also matters. Moreover, the time interval between the external beam RT and hyperthermia is related to the recurrence risk and OS. The 3-year recurrence rates in the short-term group (<79.2 minutes) and long-term group (>79.2 minutes) were 18% and 53% (P = .021), whereas the 5-year OS rates were 52% and 17%, respectively (P = .015). There was no significant difference in toxicity (P = 1.00) between the 2 groups.⁶⁸ Preclinical evidence indicated that the enhanced radiosensitivity of hyperthermia was remarkably reduced if the interval between RT and hyperthermia was longer than 1 to 2 hours, which may be because most DNA damage was repaired within 2 hours, resulting in a reduction of long-term-interval-heat therapeutic effects.⁶⁹

Concerning head and neck tumors, RT is the main treatment, but only 20% of patients with locally advanced recurrent head and neck tumors can be treated with surgery or re-irradiation therapy, and the disease control rate after retreatment is only 26% to 52%. Although the combination of RT and chemotherapy improved survival, toxicity was increased.⁷⁰ However, there is growing evidence indicating that heat improves the prognosis of head and neck tumors. Huilgol et al reported a phase III clinical trial in which 56 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were randomly admitted for RT either with (n = 28) or without (n = 26) regional hyperthermia. The complete response rate of the RT-alone group and the combination group were 42% and 79% (P < .05), respectively, and no obvious toxicity reaction was observed.⁷¹

Radiotherapy is often combined with deep hyperthermia, mostly for head and neck tumors and other radiosensitive malignant tumors. Hyperthermia is often carried out in the interval of RT, usually 1 to 2 hours after RT, with the temperature reaching 42°C and lasting for 60 to 90 minutes. Special devices are often required to achieve deep hyperthermia. For example, the HYPERcollar applicator was invented and improved continuously to achieve deep local head and neck hyperthermia, with verified therapeutic effects in multiple studies.^70,72,73

Hyperthermia Combined With Chemoradiotherapy

Hyperthermia often increases sensitivity to conventional chemoradiotherapy in some tumors that were previously less sensitive to chemoradiotherapy alone. The combination of hyperthermia and chemoradiotherapy has been widely studied in bladder and rectal cancer, among others.

In 2009, Wittlinger et al published a retrospective study of 45 patients with high-risk T1 and T2 stage bladder cancer. After transurethral resection, the patients received whole bladder and pelvic lymph node RT for 5 consecutive days a week and regional deep hyperthermia (RHT) once a week. RT was started within 60 minutes after RHT. During the whole course of RT, the lowest and highest frequencies of hyperthermia treatment were 5 and 7 times, respectively. Moreover, cPt combined with 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy was scheduled for the first and fifth weeks of treatment, and cPt was also applied to RHT. The median follow-up was 34 months (range = 12-60), and the complete response rate was 96% (43/45). The 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 85%, OS rate was 80%, disease-specific survival rate was 88%, metastasis-free survival rate was 89%, and bladder-preserving rate was 96% (43/45). Overall, the patients were satisfied with their quality of life.⁷⁴

Schroeder et al demonstrated that the potential use of regional hyperthermia in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and selection of better surgical options for rectal cancer. Between 2007 and 2010, 106 patients with locally advanced rectum cancer received neoadjuvant chemoradiation with (n = 61) or without (n = 45) regional hyperthermia. The patients received 5 weeks of RT, 5 times per week. Regional hyperthermia was administered immediately after RT, once or twice a week, with a target temperature of 40.5°C and a duration of at least 60 minutes and no longer than 90 minutes. In addition, continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil was administered in the first and fifth weeks of treatment. Low anterior or abdominoperineal resection with total mesorectal excision were performed 4 to 6 weeks after the end of chemoradiotherapy. The pCR rate reached 6.7% and 16.4% in the radiochemotherapy group and hyperthermia combined with radiochemotherapy group, respectively, and the pCR rate increased 22.5% in patients who received at least 4 cycles of hyperthermia treatments (P = .043). A particularly interesting finding of this study was that patients with low rectal tumors near the anal verge showed better sphincter preservation in the hyperthermia combined with radiochemotherapy group (57% vs 35%, P = .077).⁷⁵ Moreover, several studies have also demonstrated a better local control rate and survival benefit of the combination of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and hyperthermia than chemoradiotherapy alone for rectal cancer patients.^76,77

In clinical practice, RHT combined with radiochemotherapy has been shown to be an effective sensitizer for chemoradiotherapy, which can be applied in various types of tumors. Chemoradiotherapy is carried out according to clinical guidelines, while hyperthermia is usually performed immediately after RT, once or twice a week. Chemotherapeutic drugs are infused into the body during the hyperthermia process. In addition, the regional temperature should be monitored continuously during heating. After reaching the target temperature, hyperthermia should be carried on for at least 60 minutes and not exceed 90 minutes. Typically, the temperature achieved in 90% of tumor-related measurement points (T90) and the cumulative equivalent minutes at a reference temperature of 43°C (CEM T43) serve as effective indices.

Hyperthermia Combined With Immunotherapy

In recent years, immunotherapy has been widely praised, but its curative effect is still limited by tumor immune escape. Tumor immune escape refers to tumor cells that can avoid recognition and attack by the immune system by changing themselves or their microenvironment. The complex network of the tumor microenvironment significantly weakens the efficacy of immunotherapy, making it difficult to initiate immunotherapy in solid tumors. A crucial feature of the microenvironment that promotes tumor immune escape is the lack of tumor antigen recognition and antitumor T-cells.⁷⁸

Recent studies have shown that immunotherapy is more effective when performed in combination with other therapeutic approaches. In 2018, Kleef et al reported a 50-year-old woman with advanced triple-negative breast cancer who had postoperative axillary lymph node metastasis and even bilateral lung metastasis after standard RT. The gene analysis revealed wild-type BRCA1, with a 61% Ki-67 index, suggesting a high proliferation potential. The patient received a combination of low-dose checkpoint inhibitors, nivolumab (0.5 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (0.3 mg/kg), accompanied by local hyperthermia once a week, over 3 weeks, and high-dose interleukin-2–induced whole-body hyperthermia for 5 days. After 1 year of treatment, the total gene expression in the resected metastatic lymph node showed that immune surveillance was enhanced, with several overexpressed checkpoint genes and active cytokines (eg, interleukin-2, interferon-γ, transforming growth factor-β, etc). Overall, the patient was completely relieved, presenting with only temporary Health Organization Grades I-II diarrhea and skin rash, and the OS period was 27 months from the beginning of treatment.⁷⁹

For pancreatic cancer, owing to its anatomical location and histological characteristics, the penetration of cytotoxic drugs is restricted, causing a severe hypoxic microenvironment within the tumor and thus inhibiting the efficacy of RT and chemotherapy, leading to a poorer therapeutic effect compared with other solid tumors.^80,81 Moreover, the effectiveness of immunotherapy is also greatly reduced because of the presence of a large number of immunosuppressive cells in the microenvironment of pancreatic cancers.⁸² There is abundant evidence that hyperthermia can enhance the efficacy of RT and chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.^83-85 A recent study verified that anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy combined with RT and hyperthermia can enhance the antitumor effect.⁸⁶ Nonetheless, there is no published clinical data available on pancreatic cancer based on the tripartite treatment of RT, hyperthermia, and immunotherapy, which is supported by only animal experiments and preclinical data. One explanation for the enhanced antitumor effects of tripartite-combined therapies involves the repair inhibition of RT-induced DNA damage and improvement of the hypoxic environment of tumors, leading to increased radiosensitivity. In contrast, appropriate hyperthermia can also lead to the release of tumor antigen, recruitment of immune cells, and improvement of immune function. Hence, the triple therapy of RT, hyperthermia, and immunotherapy may become a new strategy for the treatment of pancreatic tumors, but more clinical trial data are needed to confirm it.⁸⁷

Conclusions and Future Directions

At present, hyperthermia has been widely used in clinical practice, and it has achieved good efficacy in clinical trials examining a variety of malignant tumors. Moreover, many researchers have tended to explore the combination of hyperthermia and other therapies. Hyperthermia plays an antitumor role by killing cells directly, increasing drug permeability, enhancing radiosensitivity, disrupting DNA repair, releasing antigens, and activating immunity. The key parameters of hyperthermia are the temperature and heating time, and therefore, real-time multipoint temperature measurement is crucial. Currently, conventional local hyperthermia is usually carried out for 60 to 90 minutes at a target temperature of 39.5°C to 43°C, while whole-body hyperthermia often lasts for no less than 90 minutes at 39.5°C to 42°C. In addition, considering individual differences, the duration of hyperthermia should be appropriately extended at a lower temperature for patients with poor tolerance, whereas for patients with good tolerance, the duration can be appropriately shortened at a higher temperature.

A mathematical model has validated a nonlinear relationship between the concentration of extracellular Hsp and the number of dead cells, along with a rising temperature. Through the application of hyperthermia, tumor antigens are released by extracellular Hsps during the process of tumor cell necrosis to activate antitumor immunity. This induced immunity has been further demonstrated to contribute to the control of recurrence and metastasis of tumors.^88,89 With the increase in temperature, the optimal antitumor immune effect can be achieved only in a narrow thermal dose range.⁹⁰ Nevertheless, it is still a great challenge to apply appropriate and sufficient heat energy to the target tumor without affecting normal tissue and accurately detect the temperature of the target position in vivo. Additionally, more data are needed to help guide the clinical practice of hyperthermia, such as how to combine it with other therapies, the sequence, and the interval between therapies, among others.

The recent publication of a large number of clinical trials on tumor immunotherapy has attracted the attention of the medical community. Previous in vivo and in vitro experiments have confirmed that hyperthermia can improve the expression of Hsp and activate nonspecific and specific immune responses in vivo. In a study conducted by Sottile et al, MMR-deficient (MMR−) and MMR-proficient (MMR+) cell lines were exposed to cPt combined or not with hyperthermia. Hyperthermia pretreatment increased cPt resistance in MMR− cells (1.42-fold), whereas enhanced cPt sensitivity and nuclear colocalization of Hsp27 and Hsp72 were observed with MLH1 and MSH2 in MMR+ cells.⁹¹ The sensitization of hyperthermia to chemotherapy or immunotherapy may be related to the status of MMR, and further studies are needed to identify the dominant beneficiaries of hyperthermia and how to more effectively combine chemotherapy with immunotherapy.

Furthermore, hyperthermia involves a variety of heating media to meet clinical needs. At present, photothermic therapy and magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) are the frontiers of this research field. MHT refers to the use of magnetic nanoparticles exposed to a magnetic field to generate heat, thus inhibiting tumor survival through apoptosis and necrosis pathways.⁹² The key of MHT is to select appropriate magnetic nanomaterials, construct a thermomagnetic-induced drug release polymerization platform, and stabilize the local heat transfer and subsequent release of therapeutic drugs. At present, research on MHT has made great progress, which includes nanomagnetic fluid interventional therapy and nanothermosensitive liposome–encapsulated chemotherapy drug–targeted chemotherapy. The former refers to the injection of magnetic nanomaterials into the center of tumors and the application of an alternating magnetic field to produce high temperature above 60°C in the local area of tumors, to achieve the purposes of the tumor treatment. The latter refers to the use of nanothermosensitive liposomes to encapsulate chemotherapeutic drugs and then use the temperature to control drug release. A phase II clinical trial is now being conducted to investigate nanothermo-therapy in glioblastoma multiforme. The challenge of magnetic nanoparticles lies in the associated biological toxicity, detection of the target and surrounding temperature, and more important, the study of the drug release and further immune activation mechanism. Photothermal therapy is a method in which materials is injected with high photothermic conversion efficiency into the human body, followed by its accumulation near tumor tissues through targeted recognition technology and the later conversion of light energy into heat energy under external light source irradiation (usually near-infrared light) to kill cancer cells.

For the different types of hyperthermia mentioned above, hyperthermia alone should be augmented with multiple synergistic strategies, such as MHT combined with phototherapy, to enhance its effect. In the field of cancer treatment, the increasing development of multidisciplinary synergistic therapies and the proposal of precision medicine challenge current treatments. We should take a new look at the development and prospects of hyperthermia in cancer therapy.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

YC and SW analyzed the previous literature regarding hyperthermia, and drafted the manuscript. LY, NZ, and MY provided a critical reading of the manuscript and revised it. YY revised the manuscript and approved the final version of publication. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Ying Yuan

References

Hand

. Technical and clinical advances in hyperthermia treatment of cancer. In: Lin

, ed. Electromagnetic Interaction With Biological Systems. Boston, MA: Springer; 1989:59-80.

van der Zee

. Heating the patient: a promising approach? Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1173-1184.

Bicher

Hetzel

Sandhu

, et al. Effects of hyperthermia on normal and tumor microenvironment. Radiology. 1980;137:523-530.

Vaupel

Kallinowski

Physiological effects of hyperthermia. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1987;104:71-109.

Shchors

Evan

Tumor angiogenesis: cause or consequence of cancer?

Cancer Res. 2007;67:7059-7061.

Brizel

Dodge

Clough

Dewhirst

MW.

Oxygenation of head and neck cancer: changes during radiotherapy and impact on treatment outcome. Radio Oncol. 1999;53:113-117.

Fajardo

Schreiber

Kelly

Hahn

GM.

Thermal sensitivity of endothelial cells. Radiat Res. 1985;103:276-285.

Reinhold

Endrich

Tumour microcirculation as a target for hyperthermia. Int J Hyperthermia. 1986;2:111-137.

Meyer

Braun

Rosner

Dewhirst

MW.

Local 42°C hyperthermia improves vascular conductance of the R3230Ac rat mammary adenocarcinoma during sodium nitroprusside infusion. Radiat Res. 2000;154:196-201.

10.

Song

Park

Lee

Griffin

Implications of increased tumor blood flow and oxygenation caused by mild temperature hyperthermia in tumor treatment. Int J Hyperthermia. 2005;21:761-767.

11.

Gabano

Colangelo

Ghezzi

Osella

The influence of temperature on antiproliferative effects, cellular uptake and DNA platination of the clinically employed Pt(II)-drugs. J Inorg Biochem. 2008;102:629-635.

12.

Wallner

Degregorio

GC.

Hyperthermic potentiation of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) cytotoxicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to the drug. Cancer Res. 1986;46(12 pt 1):6242-6245.

13.

Landon

Benjamin

Ashcraft

Dewhirst

MW.

A role for the copper transporter Ctr1 in the synergistic interaction between hyperthermia and cisplatin treatment. Int J Hyperthermia. 2013;29:528-538.

14.

Owusu

Abern

Inman

BA.

Hyperthermia as adjunct to intravesical chemotherapy for bladder cancer. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:262313.

15.

Passot

Cotte

Brigand

, et al. Peritoneal mesothelioma: treatment with cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy [in French]. J Chir (Paris). 2008;145:447-453.

16.

Seegenschmiedt

Fessenden

Vernon

CC.

Thermoradiotherapy and Thermochemotherapy. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1995.

17.

Kaur

Hurwitz

Krishnan

Asea

Combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2011;3:3799-3823.

18.

Kiefer

Biological Radiation Effects. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1990.

19.

Durante

Gialanella

Grossi

, et al. Radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in mouse 10T1/2 cells: dependence on the cell-cycle stage at the time of irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;65:437-447.

20.

Sitkovsky

MV.

T regulatory cells: hypoxia-adenosinergic suppression and re-direction of the immune response. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:102-108.

21.

Sitkovsky

Lukashev

Regulation of immune cells by local-tissue oxygen tension: HIF1 alpha and adenosine receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:712-721.

22.

Vega

De Maio

Increase in phagocytosis after geldanamycin treatment or heat shock: role of heat shock proteins. J Immunol. 2005;175:5280-5287.

23.

Goldring

Reveneau

Chantome

, et al. Heat shock enhances transcriptional activation of the murine-inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. FASEB J. 2000;15:2393-2395.

24.

Slawinska

Hsieh

Schmidt

Lamont

SJ.

Heat stress and lipopolysaccharide stimulation of chicken macrophage-like cell line activates expression of distinct sets of genes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164575.

25.

Ichiyanagi

Imai

Kajiwara

, et al. Essential role of endogenous heat shock protein 90 of dendritic cells in antigen cross-presentation. J Immunol. 2010;185:2693-2700.

26.

Imai

Kato

Kajiwara

, et al. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) contributes to cytosolic translocation of extracellular antigen for cross-presentation by dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:16363-16368.

27.

Murshid

Gong

Calderwood

SK.

Heat shock protein 90 mediates efficient antigen cross presentation through the scavenger receptor expressed by endothelial cells-I. J Immunol. 2010;185:2903-2917.

28.

Tanaka

Okuya

Kutomi

, et al. Heat shock protein 90 targets a chaperoned peptide to the static early endosome for efficient cross-presentation by human dendritic cells. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:18-24.

29.

Knippertz

Stein

Dörrie

, et al. Mild hyperthermia enhances human monocyte-derived dendritic cell functions and offers potential for applications in vaccination strategies. Int J Hyperthermia. 2011;27:591-603.

30.

Matsumoto

Yamamoto

Hagiwara

, et al. Optimization of hyperthermia and dendritic cell immunotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2011;25:1525-1532.

31.

Ostberg

Dayanc

Yuan

Oflazoglu

Repasky

EA.

Enhancement of natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity by fever-range thermal stress is dependent on NKG2D function and is associated with plasma membrane NKG2D clustering and increased expression of MICA on target cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82:1322-1331.

32.

Farjadian

Norouzian

Younesi

Ebrahimpour

Lotfi

Hyperthermia increases natural killer cell cytotoxicity against SW-872 liposarcoma cell line. Iran J Immunol. 2013;10:93-102.

33.

Qian

Zhang

, et al. Human heat shock protein-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes display potent antitumour immunity in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2015;166:690-701.

34.

de Jong

Koffeman

Meerding

, et al. T cell recognition of naturally presented epitopes of self-heat shock protein 70. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2014;19:569-578.

35.

Skitzki

Repasky

Evans

SS.

Hyperthermia as an immunotherapy strategy for cancer. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;10:550-558.

36.

Breloer

Dorner

Moré

Roderian

Fleischer

von Bonin

Heat shock proteins as “danger signals”: eukaryotic Hsp60 enhances and accelerates antigen-specific IFN-gamma production in T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2015;31:2051-2059.

37.

Reddy

van der Knaap

Bot

, et al. Nucleotide biosynthetic enzyme GMP synthase is a TRIM21-controlled relay of p53 stabilization. Mol Cell. 2014;53:458-470.

38.

Hardy

Goodman

Vasquez

, et al. Activation signals regulate heat shock transcription factor 1 in human B lymphocytes. J Cell Physiol. 1997;170:235-240.

39.

Chen

Wang

Zhou

Zhang

Cao

Heat shock up-regulates TLR9 expression in human B cells through activation of ERK and NF-kappaB signal pathways. Immunol Lett. 2005;98:153-159.

40.

Gandhapudi

Murapa

Threlkeld

, et al. Heat shock transcription factor 1 is activated as a consequence of lymphocyte activation and regulates a major proteostasis network in T cells critical for cell division during stress. J Immunol. 2013;191:4068-4079.

41.

Chen

Wang

Bruce

, et al. Central role of IL-6 receptor signal-transducing chain gp130 in activation of L-selectin adhesion by fever-range thermal stress. Immunity. 2004;20:59-70.

42.

Fisher

Chen

Skitzki

, et al. IL-6 trans-signaling licenses mouse and human tumor microvascular gateways for trafficking of cytotoxic T cells. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:3846-3859.

43.

Mikucki

Fisher

, et al. Preconditioning thermal therapy: flipping the switch on IL-6 for anti-tumour immunity. Int J Hyperthermia. 2013;29:464-473.

44.

Vardam

Zhou

Appenheimer

, et al. Regulation of a lymphocyte-endothelial-IL-6 trans-signaling axis by fever-range thermal stress: hot spot of immune surveillance. Cytokine. 2007;39:84-96.

45.

Wang

Goldman

Schleider

, et al. Fever-range hyperthermia enhances L-selectin-dependent adhesion of lymphocytes to vascular endothelium. J Immunol. 1998;160:961-969.

46.

Evans

Bain

Wang

WC.

Fever-range hyperthermia stimulates alpha4beta7 integrin-dependent lymphocyte-endothelial adhesion. Int J Hyperthermia. 2000;16:45-59.

47.

Gillette

Dewhirst

Gillette

, et al. Response of canine soft tissue sarcomas to radiation or radiation plus hyperthermia: a randomized phase II study. Int J Hyperthermia. 1992;8:309-320.

48.

Vernon

Hand

Field

, et al. Radiotherapy with or without hyperthermia in the treatment of superficial localized breast cancer: results from five randomized controlled trials. International Collaborative Hyperthermia Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35:731-744.

49.

Wessalowski

Kruck

Pape

Kahn

Willers

Göbel

Hyperthermia for the treatment of patients with malignant germ cell tumors: a phase I/II study in ten children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory tumors. Cancer. 1998;82:793-800.

50.

van der Zee

González-González

van Rhoon

van Dijk

van Putten

Hart

AA.

Comparison of radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia in locally advanced pelvic tumours: a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Group. Lancet. 2000;355:1119-1125.

51.

Harima

Nagata

Harima

Ostapenko

Tanaka

Sawada

A randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy versus thermoradiotherapy in stage IIIB cervical carcinoma. 2001. Int J Hyperthermia. 2009;25:338-343.

52.

Issels

Lindner

Verweij

, et al. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone or with regional hyperthermia for localised high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised phase 3 multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:561-570.

53.

Mallory

Gogineni

Jones

Greer

Simone

2nd . Therapeutic hyperthermia: the old, the new, and the upcoming. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;97:56-64.

54.

Cohen

Rúa

Balcarce

Drut

Expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in Helicobacter pylori–associated chronic gastritis in children. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7:180-186.

55.

Zschaeck

Wust

Melcher

, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation versus chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia in high-grade soft tissue sarcomas: a retrospective comparison. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;35:1-9.

56.

Angele

Albertsmeier

Prix

, et al. Effectiveness of regional hyperthermia with chemotherapy for high-risk retroperitoneal and abdominal soft-tissue sarcoma after complete surgical resection: a subgroup analysis of a randomized phase-III multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2014;260:749-756.

57.

Klimanov

Syvak

Orel

, et al. Efficacy of combined regional inductive moderate hyperthermia and chemotherapy in patients with multiple liver metastases from breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018;17:1533033818806003.

58.

Nathan

Cunningham-Bussel

Beyond oxidative stress: an immunologist’s guide to reactive oxygen species. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:349-361.

59.

Tabuchi

Ahmed

Kondo

. Induction of oxidative stress by hyperthermia and enhancement of hyperthermia-induced apoptosis by oxidative stress modification. In: Kokura

Yoshikawa

Ohnishi

, eds. Hyperthermic Oncology From Bench to Bedside. Singapore: Springer; 2016:7-18.

60.

Glehen

Mohamed

Gilly

FN.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis from digestive tract cancer: new management by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5:219-228.

61.

Van der Speeten

Stuart

Sugarbaker

PH.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of perioperative cancer chemotherapy in peritoneal surface malignancy. Cancer J. 2009;15:216-224.

62.

Chua

Liauw

Saxena

, et al. Evolution of locoregional treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis: single-center experience of 308 procedures of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 2011;201:149-156.

63.

Deraco

Virzì

Iusco

, et al. Secondary cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a multi-institutional study. BJOG. 2012;119:800-809.

64.

Spiliotis

Vaxevanidou

Sergouniotis

Lambropoulou

Datsis

Christopoulou

The role of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer: a prospective study. J BUON. 2011;16:74-79.

65.

Prosnitz

Jones

Counterpoint: test the value of hyperthermia in patients with carcinoma of the cervix being treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2002;18:13-18.

66.

Franckena

Lutgens

Koper

, et al. Radiotherapy and hyperthermia for treatment of primary locally advanced cervix cancer: results in 378 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:242-250.

67.

Franckena

Review of radiotherapy and hyperthermia in primary cervical cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28:543-548.

68.

van Leeuwen

Oei

Chin

KWTK

, et al. A short time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia reduces in-field recurrence and mortality in women with advanced cervical cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12:75.

69.

van Leeuwen

Crezee

Oei

, et al. The effect of time interval between radiotherapy and hyperthermia on planned equivalent radiation dose. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;34:901-909.

70.

Verduijn

de Wee

Rijnen

, et al. Deep hyperthermia with the HYPERcollar system combined with irradiation for advanced head and neck carcinoma—a feasibility study. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;34:994-1001.

71.

Huilgol

Gupta

Sridhar

CR.

Hyperthermia with radiation in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer: a report of randomized trial. J Cancer Ther Res. 2010;6:492-496.

72.

Paulides

Bakker

Neufeld

, et al. Winner of the “New Investigator Award” at the European Society of Hyperthermia Oncology Meeting 2007. The HYPERcollar: a novel applicator for hyperthermia in the head and neck. Int J Hyperthermia. 2007;23:567-576.

73.

Paulides

Verduijn

Van Holthe

Status quo and directions in deep head and neck hyperthermia. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:21.

74.

Wittlinger

Rödel

Weiss

, et al. Quadrimodal treatment of high-risk T1 and T2 bladder cancer: transurethral tumor resection followed by concurrent radiochemotherapy and regional deep hyperthermia. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93:358-363.

75.

Schroeder

Gani

Lamprecht

, et al. Pathological complete response and sphincter-sparing surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with regional hyperthermia for locally advanced rectal cancer compared with radiochemotherapy alone. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28:707-714.

76.

Gani

Schroeder

Heinrich

, et al. Long-term local control and survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy in combination with deep regional hyperthermia in locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32:187-192.

77.

Kim

Kang

MK.

Selecting patients for hyperthermia combined with preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23:287-297.

78.

Sanmamed

Chen

A paradigm shift in cancer immunotherapy: from enhancement to normalization. Cell. 2019;176:677.

79.

Kleef

Moss

Szasz

Bohdjalian

Bojar

Bakacs

Complete clinical remission of stage IV triple-negative breast cancer lung metastasis administering low-dose immune checkpoint blockade in combination with hyperthermia and interleukin-2. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1297-1303.

80.

Fukumura

Jain

RK.

Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: targets for anti-angiogenesis and normalization. Microvasc Res. 2007;74:72-84.

81.

Apte

Wilson

Lugea

Pandol

SJ.

A starring role for stellate cells in the pancreatic cancer microenvironment. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:1210-1219.

82.

Feig

Gopinathan

Neesse

Chan

Cook

Tuveson

DA.

The pancreas cancer microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:4266-4276.

83.

Tsuchiya

Ishikawa

Okajima

, et al. Abstract 3695: Efficacy of gemcitabine combined with hyperthermia therapy in the treatment of unresectable pancreatic cancer: phase II study. Cancer Res. 2012;72(8 suppl):3695.

84.

Peng

Guiming

Xianguo

, et al. Clinical efficacy of local hyperthermia in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. J Modern Oncol. 2015;23:655-657.

85.

van der Horst

Versteijne

Besselink

MGH

, et al. The clinical benefit of hyperthermia in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Int J Hyperthermia. 2018;34:969-979.

86.

Wang

Cai

, et al. Surface-functionalized modified copper sulfide nanoparticles enhance checkpoint blockade tumor immunotherapy by photothermal therapy and antigen capturing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:13964-13972.

87.

Mittal

Zimmer

Sathiaseelan

, et al. Phase I/II trial of combined 131I anti-CEA monoclonal antibody and hyperthermia in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1996;78:1861-1870.

88.

Kregel

KC.

Heat shock proteins: modifying factors in physiological stress responses and acquired thermotolerance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002;192:2177-2186.

89.

Frey

Weiss

Rubner

, et al. Old and new facts about hyperthermia-induced modulations of the immune system. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28:528-542.

90.

Lin

Hsu

Lin

YY.

Nano-therapeutic cancer immunotherapy using hyperthermia-induced heat shock proteins: insights from mathematical modeling. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:3529-3539.

91.

Sottile

Losinno

Fanelli

, et al. Hyperthermia effects on Hsp27 and Hsp72 associations with mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and cisplatin toxicity in MMR-deficient/proficient colon cancer cell lines. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31:464-475.

92.

Cazares-Cortes

Cabana

Boitard

, et al. Recent insights in magnetic hyperthermia: from the “hot-spot” effect for local delivery to combined magneto-photo-thermia using magneto-plasmonic hybrids. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;138:233-246.