Purpose. The purpose of this study is to describe the essential features of the transformative experience among people living with cancer who are seeking integrative care and to identify factors supporting this process. It is hoped that after establishing the nature and meaning of this change or shift, one will better understand what is most meaningful in terms of providing appropriate care and support to patients seeking integrative care. Study Design. An interpretational, qualitative approach guided sampling, data collection, and analysis with 11 individuals. A purposeful sample was drawn from selected integrative care facilities according to sociodemographics and type of cancer. Due to the complexity of this subject, second interviews were conducted with 5 participants to enhance the richness and validity of the data. Results. The experience of transformation is a dynamic 4-stage process in which participants learned about themselves and became more aware of who they are and how they relate to the world. Participants found that 4 dimensions of integrative medicine played a fundamental role in supporting this process. These dimensions include (1) having access to a range of appropriate therapies to support individual journeys, (2) care that focuses on one’s overall well-being, (3) control over cancer management, and (4) developing healing relationships with care providers. Conclusion. Although practitioners may not be able to create transformative experiences for patients, they may be able to establish and maintain conditions that support this process.
1. Paterson B, Thorne S.Living with diabetes as a transformational experience. Qual Health Res. 1999;9:786-803.
2.
2. Lindsey E.Health within illness: experiences of chronically ill/disabled people. J Adv Nurs. 1996;24:465-472.
3.
3. Coward DD, Reed PG.Self transcendence: a resource for healing at the end of life. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1996;17:275-288.
4.
4. Paterson BL.The shifting perspectives model of chronic illness. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33:21-26.
5.
5. Barroso J.Reconstructing my life: becoming a long-term survivor of AIDS. Qual Health Res. 1999;7:57-74.
6.
6. Schaefer KM.Women living in paradox: loss and discovery in chronic illness. Holist Nurs Pract. 1995;9:63-74.
7.
7. Maizes V, Caspi O.The principles and challenges of integrative medicine. West J Med. 1999;3:148-149.
8.
8. Ballentine R. Radical healing and the rebirth of science. Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients. 2001; Feb/March.
9.
9. Bell IR, Caspi O, Schwartz G, et al.Integrative medicine and systemic outcomes research. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:133-140.
10.
10. Verhoef M, Findlay B.Maturation of complementary and alternative healthcare in Canada. Healthc Pap. 2003;3:56-61.
11.
11. Pope A, Mulkins A, Verhoef M.A mixed-methods approach to evaluating a group yogic breathing and meditation intervention for individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Unpublished manuscript.
12.
12. Mulkins A, Morse J, Best A.Complementary therapy use in HIV/AIDS. Can J Public Health. 2002;93:308-312.
13.
13. Mitchell A, Cormack M.The therapeutic relationship in complementary health care. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1998.
14.
14. Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J.Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:169-177.
15.
15. Glaser BG, Strauss AL.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine; 1967.
16.
16. Jonas WB, Chez RA, Duffy B, Strand D.Investigating the impact of optimal healing environments. Altern Ther Health Med. 2003; 9:36-40.
18. Tedeschi RG, Park CL, Calhoun LG.Trauma and Transformation: Growing in the Aftermath of Suffering. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications; 1995.
19.
19. Lechner SC, Zakowski SG, Antoni MH, Greenhawt M, Block K, Block P.Do sociodemographic and disease-related variables influence benefit-finding in cancer patients?Psychooncology. 2003;12:491-499.
