Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Is it all the Same?

Abstract

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (OM) requires a longer duration of therapy, a greater need for surgery and implies a higher rate of recidivism, a higher amputation risk, and lower treatment success. But do all bone infections behave the same way, require the same treatment, or imply the same prognosis? Actually, in clinical practice we can verify there are different clinical presentations of OM. The first one is that associated with the infected diabetic foot attack. It requires urgent surgery and debridement since “time is tissue.” Clinical features and radiographs are enough for the diagnosis, and treatment should not be delayed. The second one is related to a sausage toe. It affects phalanges and it can be treated with a 6- or 8-week antibiotic course with a high rate of success. Clinical features and radiographs are sufficient for the diagnosis in this case. The third presentation is OM superimposed to Charcot's neuroarthropathy, which mainly comprises midfoot or hindfoot. It starts with a plantar ulcer in a foot that has developed a deformity. The treatment is based on an accurate diagnosis that often includes magnetic resonance, and requires a complex surgery to preserve the midfoot and to avoid recurrent ulcers or foot instability. The final presentation is that of an OM without large soft tissue compromise secondary to a chronic ulcer or a previous unsuccessful surgery secondary to minor amputation or debridement. There is often a small ulcer with a positive probe to bone test over a bony prominence. Diagnosis is made by clinical features, radiographs, and laboratory tests. Treatment includes antibiotic therapy guided by surgical or transcutaneous biopsy, but this presentation often requires surgery. Different presentations of OM mentioned above need to be recognized because the diagnosis, type of culture, antibiotic treatment, surgical treatment, and prognosis are different upon the presentation.