This is a straightforward case in which several interrelated components nevertheless called for specific therapeutic attention. Matters pertaining to racial discrimination, cultural limits, and readiness for change had to be factored into the treatment trajectory. The anxiety, depression, and self-denigrating tendencies that had brought the client to therapy called for careful timing, some audacious advice, and several standard cognitivebehavioral procedures.
Bandura, A.
(1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Bandura, A.
(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Chambless, D.
(1995). Training in and dissemination of empirically-validated psychological treatments: Report and recommendations. The Clinical Psychologist, 48, 3-23.
4.
Herman, S. M.
(1992a). A demonstration of the validity of the Multimodal Structural Profile Inventory through a correlation with theVocational Preference Inventory. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 11, 71-80.
5.
Herman, S. M.
(1992b). Predicting psychotherapists' treatment theories by multimodal structural profile inventories: An exploratory study. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 11, 85-100.
6.
Herman, S. M.
(1994). The diagnostic utility of the Multimodal Structural Profile Inventory. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 13, 55-62.
Kwee, M.G.T.
,& Kwee-Taams, M. K. (1994). Klinische gedragstherapie in Nederland& vlaanderen[Clinical behavior therapy in the Netherlands]. Delft, Holland: Eubron.
9.
Lazarus, A. A.
(1967). In support of technical eclecticism. Psychological Reports, 21, 415-416.
10.
Lazarus, A. A.
(1989). The practice of multimodal therapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Lazarus, A. A.
(1992). Multimodal therapy: Technical eclecticism with minimal integration. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration(pp. 231-263). New York: Basic Books.
12.
Lazarus, A. A.
(1995). Different types of eclecticism and integration: Let's be aware of the dangers. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 5, 27-39.
13.
Lazarus, A. A.
(1997). Brief but comprehensive psychotherapy: The multimodal way. New York: Springer.
14.
Lazarus, A. A.
,& Beutler, L. E. (1993). Ontechnical eclecticism. Journal of Counseling& Development, 71, 381-385.
15.
Lazarus, A. A.
, Beutler, L. E., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). The future of technical eclecticism. Psychotherapy, 29, 11-20.
16.
Lazarus, A. A.
,& Lazarus, C. N. (1991). Multimodal life historyinventory. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
17.
Lazarus, A. A.
,& Lazarus, C. N. (1998). Clinical purposes of the Multimodal Life History Inventory. InG. P. Koocher, J. C. Norcross, & S. S. Hill, III (Eds.), Psychologists' desk reference(pp. 15-21). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Prochaska, J. O.
, & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). The transtheoretical approach. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Handbook of eclectic psychotherapy(pp. 163-200). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
19.
Rosen, R. C.
, & Leiblum, S. R. (1995). Case studies in sex therapy. New York: Guilford.
20.
Rotter, J. B.
(1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Williams, T. A. (1988). A multimodal approach to assessment and intervention with children with learning disabilities. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow.
22.
Wilson, G. T.
(1995). Empirically validated treatments as a basis for clinical practice: Problems and prospects. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, R. M. Dawes,& K. E. Grady (Eds.), Scientific standards of psychological practice: Issues and recommendations(pp. 163-196). Reno, NV: Context.
