Changes Over the Past Decade in Special Education Referral to Placement Probability

Abstract

Over a decade ago, Algozzine, Christenson and Ysseldyke (1982) presented data that indicated a very high percentage of referred students were determined eligible for special education. Assessment and decision making practices have changed significantly over the past 10 years. For example, there is a greater reliance on pre-referral practices, problem solving and curriculum-based assessment. In this paper we examine the extent to which there have been changes in the number of referred students assessed, and the number of assessed students declared eligible and served. Rates were consistent with earlier results: 90 to 92% of referred students were tested and 70 to 74% of tested students were declared eligible. Implications for practice, alternative explanations and future directions for research are provided.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine, B. , & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1987). In defense of different numbers. Remedial and Special Education, 8 (2), 53–56.

Algozzine, B. , Christenson, S. L. , & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1982). Probabilities associated with the referral to placement process. Teacher Education and Special Education, 5 (3), 19–23.

Algozzine, B. , Ysseldyke, J. E. , & Christenson, S.L. (1983). An analysis of the incidence of special education placement: The masses are burgeoning. Journal of Special Education, 17, 141–147.

Council for Exceptional Children , (1995). Record number of special education students served in 1993–1994. CEC Today, 2(6), 1–5.

Flugum, K.R. , & Reschly, D. J. (1994). Pre-referral interventions: Quality indices and outcomes. Journal of School Psychology,, 32 (1), 1–14.

Fugate, D. J. , Clarizio, H. F. , & Phillips, S.E. (1993). Referral-to-placement ratio: A finding in need of reassessment?. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 413–416.

Graden, J.L. , Casey, A.M. , & Bonstrom (1985). Implementing a pre-referral intervention system: Part II. The data, Exceptional Children, 51(5), 387–396.

Graden, J.L. , Casey, A. M. , & Christenson, S.L. (1985). Implementing a pre-referral intervention system: Part I. The model. Exceptional Children, 51 (5), 377–386.

Hallahan, D.P. (1992). Some thoughts on why the prevalence of learning disabilities has increased. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 523–528.

10.

Hallahan, D.P. , Keller, C. E. , & Ball, D.W. (1986). A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education. Remediat and Special Education, 7 (2), 8–14.

11.

Kavale, K.A. (1995). Setting the record straight on learning disability and low achievement: The tortuous path of ideology. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 145–152.

12.

Lopez-Reyna, N.A. , Bay, M. , & Patrikakou, E.N. (1996). Use of assessment procedures: Learning disabilities teachers' perspectives. Diagnostique, 21(2), 35–49.

13.

Swanson, H.L. (1996). Classification and dynamic assessment of children with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28 (9), 1–20.

14.

U.S. Department of Education , (1995). Seventeenth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, D.C.: Office of Special Education Programs