BenderL. (1938). A visual motor Gestalt test and its clinical use (Research Monograph No. 3). New York: American Orthopsychiatry Association.
2.
BurgemeisterB.B., BlumL.H., & LorgeI. (1972). Columbia Mental Maturity Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
3.
CarvajalH. (1988). Relationships between scores of gifted children on the Stanford-Binet IV and Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Diagnostique, 14, 22–25.
CarvajalH., McVeyS., SellersT., WeynandK., & McKnabP. (1987). Relationship between scores on the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of Stanford-Binet IV, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised, Columbia Mental Maturity Scale, and Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test. The Psychological Record, 61, 127–130.
6.
CarvajalH., & WeaverK.A. (1988). Relationship between scores of gifted children on Stanford-Binet IV and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Diagnostique, 14, 89–93.
7.
DunnL., & DunnL. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
8.
HarrisD. (1963). Children's drawings as measures of intellectual maturity.Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
9.
HartwigS.S., SappG.L., & ClaytonG.A. (1986). Comparison of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Form L-M and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Fourth Edition. Psychological Reports, 60, 1215–1218.
10.
HaydenDC., FurlongM.J., & LinnemeyerS. (1988). A comparison of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children and the Stanford-Binet IV for the assessment of gifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 239–243.
11.
KaufmanA., & KaufmanN. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, interpretive manual.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
12.
KeithT.Z., CoolV.A., NovakC.G., WhiteL.J., & PottebaumS.M. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition: Testing the theory-test match. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 253–274.
13.
KrohnE.J., & LampR.E. (1989). Concurrent validity of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition and K–ABC for Head Start children. Journal of School Psychology, 27, 59–67.
14.
McCarthyD. (1972). Manual for the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
15.
PhelpsL. (1989). Comparison of scores for intellectually gifted students on the WISC–R and the Fourth Edition of the Stanford-Binet. Psychology in the Schools, 26125–129.
16.
PhelpsL., BellM.C., & ScottM.J. (1988). Correlations between the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition and the WISC–R with a learning disabled population. Psychology in the Schools, 25, 38–383.
17.
ReynoldsC.R., KamphausR.W., & RosenthalB.L. (1988). Factor analysis of the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition for ages 2 years through 23 years. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 52–63.
18.
SattlerJ.M. (1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Sattler.