The Compatibility Between State Eligibility Criteria for Developmental Delays and Available Early Childhood Assessment Instrumentation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to survey the 50 state consultants in early childhood special education in the U.S. to evaluate whether they perceived available developmental assessment instrumentation to be satisfactory for the identification of children with developmental delays in the 3- through 5-year-old age range. The survey questions were organized into four main themes: (a) a description of eligibility criteria used to identify children with developmental delays; (b) the general operational characteristics of the early childhood handicapped identification system; (c) satisfaction with the available assessment instrumentation for the identification of developmental delays given state eligibility criteria; and (d) demographic information on the respondents. Results showed a need for assessment instruments that facilitate parent involvement and a need for special norms for minorities and children with physical disabilities. The significance and implications of these and other findings for early childhood practitioners and researchers were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bracken, B.A. (1987). Limitations of preschool instruments and standards for minimal levels of technical adequacy. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5, 313–326.

Bracken, B.A. (1991). The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bristol, M.M. (1987). Methodological concerns in the assessment of single-partner families of handicapped children. Journal of the Division of Early Childhood, 11, 135–142.

Caldwell, B.M. , & Bradley, R.H. (1984). Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.

Dillman, D.A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys. The total design method. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Dunst, C.J. , & Trivette, CM. (1988). An enablement and empowerment perspective of case management. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8, 87–102.

Filsinger, E. , & Lewis, R. (Eds.) (1981). Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Guba, E. , & Lincoln, Y. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Guralnick, M.J. , & Weinhouse, E. (1983). Child-child social interactions: An analysis of assessment instruments for young children. Exceptional Children, 50, 268–271.

10.

Harbin, G.L. (1988). Implementation of P.L. 99–457: State technical assistance needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8, 24–36.

11.

Harrington, R.G. (1984). Preschool screening: The school psychologist's perspective. School Psychology Review, 13, 363–374.

12.

Harrington, R.G. (1984). The Battelle Developmental Inventory. In R. Sweetland & D. Keyser (Eds.), Test Critiques, 2, 72–82. Kansas City, MO: Test Corporation of America.

13.

Kelly, M.F. , & Surbeck, E. (1992). History of preschool assessment. In B. Bracken (Ed.), The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (pp. 1–17). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

14.

Leiter, R.G. (1948). Leiter International Performance Scale. Chicago: Stoelting.

15.

Lidz, C.S. (1991). Issues in the assessment of preschool children. In B. Bracken (Ed.). The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children (pp. 18–31). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

16.

Meisels, S.J. (1987). Uses and abuses of developmental screening and school readiness testing. Young Children, 42, 68–73.

17.

Meisels, S. , Harbin, G. , Modigliani, K. , & Olson, K. (1988). Formulating optimal state early childhood intervention policies. Exceptional Children, 15, 159–165.

18.

Olson, D. , Sprenkle, D. , & Russell, C. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems I: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications. Family Process, 18, 3–28.

19.

Patterson, G. (1976). Some procedures for assessing changes in marital interaction patterns. Oregon Research Institute Bulletin, 16, (7).

20.

Sattler, J.M. (1989). Assessment of children. San Diego: Author.

21.

Sheehan, R. (1988). Implications of P.L. 99–457 for assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 8, (4), 103–115.

22.

Simmeonsson, R. , & Bailey, D. (1988). Essential elements of the assessment process. In T. Wachs & R. Sheehan (Eds.), Assessment of young developmentally disabled children (pp. 25–41). New York: Plenum.