BalowC.E., & JulianoD.B. (1987). Stability and predictive validity of the Matrix Analogies Test and Bracken Basic Concept Scale with low achievers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2.
BoehmA.E. (1971). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
BrackenB.A. (1986). Bracken Concept Development Program.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
7.
BrackenB.A., & CatoL.A. (1986). Rate of conceptual development among deaf preschool and primary children as compared to a matched group of nonhearing impaired children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 95–99.
8.
BrackenB.A., HowellK.K., HarrisonR.E., StanfordL.D., & ZahnB.H. (1990). Ipsative profile stability of the Bracken Basic Concept Scale and the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children in a preschool sample. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Farrar-FoleyG.M. (1987). Performance of primary level learning disabled children on Bracken Basic Concept Scale and Matrix Analogies Test: Possibility of a test profile. Unpublished masters thesis. The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
11.
JastakS., & WilkinsonG.S. (1984). Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised.Wilmington, DE: Jastak Assessment Systems.
12.
KaufmanA.S., & KaufmanN.L. (1983). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
SternerA.G. (1988). The relationship of the Gesell Developmental Exam and Bracken Basic Concept Scale to academic achievement. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Southern Mississippi.
16.
WilliamsK.T., GridleyB., & PowersA.D. (1988). Using parental input to predict kindergarten performance. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.
17.
ZuckerS., & RiordanJ. (1987). Assessing kindergarten readiness: The validity of new and revised measures. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of School Psychologists, New Orleans.
