Multilevel Academic Survey Test (MAST)

Bacon E.H. (1989). Review of the Multilevel Academic Survey Test. In Conoley J.C. & Kramer J.J. (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 526–530). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute for Mental Measurement.

Friedrich D. , Fuller G.B. , & Davis D. (1984). Learning disability: Fact and fiction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 205–209.

Haring T.G. (1989). Review of the Multilevel Academic Survey Test. In Conoley J.C. & Kramer J.J. (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 526–530). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute for Mental Measurement.

Hieronymus A.N. , Hoover H.D. , & Lindquist E.F. (1986). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Chicago: Riverside.

Hopkins K.D. , Stanley J.C. , & Hopkins B.R. (1990). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Howell K.W. , Kaplan J.S. , & Serapiglia T. (1980). Diagnosing basic skills: A handbook for deciding what to teach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Howell K.W. , & Morehead M.K. (1987). Curriculum-based evaluation for special and remedial education. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Howell K.W. , Zucker S. , & Morehead M.K. (1982). The Multilevel Academic Survey Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

Naglieri J.A. (1985). Matrix Analogies Test–Short Form. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

Powers S. , & Crowder C. (1982). Redundancy in the California Achievement Test. Educational and Psycholgical Measurement, 42, 1253–1258.

Salvia J. , & Ysseldyke J.E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Shepard L.A. , Smith M.L. , & Vojir C.P. (1983). Characteristics of pupils identified as learning disabled. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 309–331.

Torgeson J.K. (1989). Why IQ is relevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 484–486.

Ysseldyke J.E. , Algozzine B. , Richey L. , & Graden J. (1982). Declaring students eligible for learning disability services: Why bother with the data? Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 37–44.