Ashlock. (1990). Error patterns in computation: A semi-programmed approach (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
3.
BachorD. (1990). Towards improving assessment of students with special needs: Expanding the data base to include classroom performance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 36, 65–77.
4.
CawleyJ.F. (1985). Learning disability and mathematics appraisal. In CrawleyJ.F. (Ed.), Practical mathematics appraisal of the learning disabled (pp. 1–40). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
5.
ConnollyA.J. (1988). KeyMath Revised.Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
6.
ConnollyA.J. (in press). KeyMath Revised: Canadian Edition.Toronto, Canada: Psycan.
ConnollyA.J., NachtmanW., & PritchettE.M. (1985). KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test Manual: Canadian Edition.Toronto, Canada: Psycan.
10.
EavesR.C., VanceH.R., MannL., & BohannonA. (in press). Using the Cognitive Levels Test to estimate achievement on the KeyMath Revised, and the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised. Psychology in the Schools.
11.
GoodsteinH.A., KahnH., & CawleyJ.F. (1976). The achievement of educable mentally retarded children on the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test. Journal of Special Education, 10, 61–70.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics for the 1980s.Reston, VA: Author.
13.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
14.
SalviaJ., & YsseldykeJ.E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
TinneyFA. (1975). A comparison of the KeyMath Diagnostic Arithmetic Test and the California Arithmetic Test used with learning-disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 313–315.