In this editorial we introduce two new types of manuscript submissions: registered reports and research to practice. We provide a brief overview on the history and benefits of registered reports and how to submit these to AEI. Next we introduce research to practice pieces and invite past authors to consider how they might reframe their academic article published in AEI to be applicable to practitioners.
GelmanA.LokenE. (2014). The statistical crisis in science: Data-dependent analysis—A “garden of forking paths”—Explains why many statistically significant comparisons don’t hold up. American Scientist, 102(6), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1511/2014.111.460
2.
KazakA. E. (2018). Editorial: Journal article reporting standards. American Psychologist, 73(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000263
3.
KleinR. A.VianelloM.HasselmanF.AdamsB. G.AdamsR. B.Jr.AlperS.AveyardM.AxtJ.BabaloiaM.BahníkŠ.BerkicsM.BernsteinM. J.BerryD. R.BialobrzeskaO.BocianK.BrandtM.BuschingR.CaiH.CambierF.. . .NosekB. A. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting. PsyArXiv Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9654g
4.
National Academies of Sciences, Policy, Global Affairs, & Committee on Responsible Science. (2017). Fostering integrity in research. National Academies Press.
5.
NosekB. A.CohoonJ.KidwellM.SpiesJ. R. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
6.
TosteJ. R.TalbottE.CummingM. M. (2023). Special issue preview: Introducing the next generation of quality indicators for research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 357–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231174106
