Developing mathematics proficiency requires an understanding of mathematics vocabulary. Although previous research has developed several measures of mathematics vocabulary at different grade levels, no study focused solely on fraction vocabularies. We developed and tested a measure of fraction vocabulary for students in Grade 4 to determine the internal consistency and difficulty level of such a measure. Analysis indicated the measure demonstrated high internal consistency. Students, on average, answered less than one-third of fraction vocabularies correctly. We also detected performance differences between students with and without mathematics difficulty and dual-language learners and their peers.
AnselmiP.ColledaniD.RobustoE. (2019). A comparison of classical and modern measures of internal consistency. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02714
2.
BaumannJ. F.GravesM. F. (2010). What is academic vocabulary? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.54.1.1
3.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurements in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BrunerJ. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
ForsythS. R.PowellS. R. (2017). Differences in the mathematics-vocabulary knowledge of fifth-grade students with and without learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(4), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12144
10.
FuchsL. S.DeSelmsJ.DeasonJ. L. (2012). Word problem-specific language assessment. Vanderbilt University.
11.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.StuebingK.FletcherJ. M.HamlettC. L.LambertW. (2008). Problem solving and computational skill: Are they shared or distinct aspects of mathematical cognition?Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.30
12.
GayA. S. (2008). Helping teachers connect vocabulary and conceptual understanding. The Mathematics Teacher, 102(3), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.102.3.0218
13.
HaladynaT. M.RodriguezM. C. (2013). Developing and validating test items. Routledge.
14.
Hassinger-DasB.JordanN. C.DysonN. (2015). Reading stories to learn math: Mathematics vocabulary instruction for children with early numeracy difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/683986
15.
HughesE. M.PowellS. R.LeeJ. Y. (2020). Development and psychometric report of a middle-school mathematics vocabulary measure. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418820116
KellarW. R. (1939). The relative contribution of certain factors to individual differences in algebraic problem solving ability. The Journal of Experimental Education, 8(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1939.11010144
18.
LiangJ. H.HeckmanP. E.AbediJ. (2018). Prior year’s predictors of eighth-grade algebra achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(3), 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18770172
19.
LinX.PengP.LuoH. J. (2021). The deficit profile of elementary students with computational difficulties versus word problem-solving difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948719865499
20.
LinX.PengP.ZengJ. G. (2021). Understanding the relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 504–540. https://doi.org/10.1086/712504
21.
LinX.PowellS. (2023). Initial efficacy of a fraction vocabulary intervention for students experiencing mathematics difficulty in grade 4. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12321
22.
MilesD. D. (1999). Algebra vocabulary: Domain-specific language as predictor of algebra skills (Publication No. 9221551) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
23.
MoschkovichJ. N. (2015). Scaffolding student participation in mathematical practices. ZDM: Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0730-3
24.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards mathematics. Author.
25.
NelsonG.KissA. J. (2021). Effects of a first-grade mathematics vocabulary intervention: A pilot study for students with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12242
26.
NelsonG.PowellS. R. (2018). A systematic review of longitudinal studies of mathematics difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417714773
27.
Pearson Inc. (2004). Stanford Achievement Test, Tenth Edition (SAT-10).
28.
PengP.LinX. (2019). The relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance among fourth graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 69(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.006
29.
Petersen-BrownS.LundbergA. R.RayJ. E.Dela PazI. N.RissC. L.PanahonC. J. (2019). Applying spaced practice in the schools to teach math vocabulary. Psychology in the Schools, 56(6), 977–991. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22248
30.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A. (2021). Grade 4 word-problem screener.
31.
PowellS. R.BerryK. A.TranL. M. (2020). Performance differences on a measure of mathematics vocabulary for English learners and non-English learners with and without mathematics difficulty. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1677538
32.
PowellS. R.BosS. E.LinX. (2021). The assessment of mathematics vocabulary in the elementary and middle school grades. In Fritz-StratmannA.GürsoyE.HerzogM. (Eds.), Diversity dimensions in mathematics and language learning (pp. 313–330). De Grutyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110661941-016
33.
PowellS. R.DriverM. K. (2015). The influence of mathematics vocabulary instruction embedded within addition tutoring for first-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(4), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0731948714564574
34.
PowellS. R.DriverM. K.RobertsG.FallA.-M. (2017). An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third- and fifth-grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation. Learning and Individual Differences, 57(5), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.011
35.
PowellS. R.NelsonG. (2017). An investigation of the mathematics-vocabulary knowledge of first-grade students. The Elementary School Journal, 117(4), 664–686. https://doi.org/10.1086/691604
36.
PurpuraD. J.LoganJ. A. R. (2015). The nonlinear relations of the approximate number system and mathematical language to early mathematics development. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1717–1724. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000055
37.
PurpuraD. J.NapoliA. R.WehrspannE. A.GoldZ. S. (2017). Causal connections between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge: A dialogic reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1204639
38.
PurpuraD. J.SchmittS. A.NapoliA. R.Dobbs-OatesJ.KingY. A.HornburgC. B.WesterbergL.BorrielloG. A.BryantL. M.AnayaL. Y.KungM.LitkowskiE.LinJ.RolanE. (2021). Engaging caregivers and children in picture books: A family-implemented mathematical language intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1338–1353. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000662
RubensteinR. N.ThompsonD. R. (2002). Understanding and supporting children’s mathematical vocabulary development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(2), 107–113.
41.
RunnelsJ. (2012). Using the Rasch model to validate a multiple choice English achievement test. International Journal of Language Studies, 6(4), 141–153.
42.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
43.
SchumacherR. F.JayanthiM.GerstenR.DiminoJ.SpalloneS.HaymondK. S. (2018). Using the number line to promote understanding of fractions for struggling fifth graders: A formative pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 33(4), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12169
44.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM. I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
45.
SieglerR. S.PykeA. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200
46.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
WuM.AdamsR. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Educational Measurement Solutions.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
