Is a Picture Worth 1,000 Words? Investigating Fraction Magnitude Knowledge Through Analysis of Student Representations

Abstract

The present study examines the features and quality of visual representations (VRs) created by middle school students with learning disabilities and difficulties in mathematics in response to a released fraction item from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Relations between VR quality and scores on other measures of fraction knowledge are also investigated. Results show that students used circular area models most frequently to represent the NAEP item, but used bar models most accurately. Based on results, bar models may be the most efficient and effective area model VRs for use in fractions instruction. Representation quality was associated with problem-solving accuracy, as well as with performance on fraction number line estimation and fraction magnitude comparison. Implications for practice are discussed.

Keywords

visual representations learning disabilities fraction magnitude understanding

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey

D. H.

Hoard

M. K.

Nugent

Geary

D. C.

(2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 447–455. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004

Beswick

Callingham

Watson

(2012). The nature of middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15, 131–157.

Chow

J. C.

Jacobs

(2016). The role of language in fraction performance: A synthesis of literature. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 252–257.

Flores

M. M.

Hinton

V. M.

Meyer

J. M.

(2018). Teaching Fraction Concepts Using the Concrete-Representational-Abstract Sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 0741932518795477. doi:10.1177/0741932518795477

Fuchs

L. S.

Schumacher

R. F.

Long

Namkung

Hamlett

C. L.

Cirino

P. T.

. . .Changas

(2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 683–700. doi:10.1037/a0032446

Gersten

Beckmann

Clarke

Foegen

Marsh

Star

J. R.

Witzel

(2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Science, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/rti_math_pg_042109.pdf

Gersten

Schumacher

R. F.

Jordan

N. C.

(2016). Life on the number line: Routes to understanding fraction magnitude for students with difficulties learning mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 655–657.

Hecht

S. A.

(1998). Toward an information-processing account of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 545–559. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.3.545

Hecht

S. A.

Santisi

(2003). Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 277–302.

10.

Hecht

S. A.

Vagi

K. J.

(2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 843–859.

11.

Jitendra

A. K.

Nelson

Pulles

S. M.

Kiss

A. J.

Houseworth

(2016). Is mathematical representation of problems an evidence-based strategy for students with mathematics difficulties? Exceptional Children, 83, 8–25. doi:10.1177/0014402915625062

12.

Jordan

N. C.

Resnick

Rodrigues

Hansen

Dyson

(2016). Delaware longitudinal study of fraction learning implications for helping children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 621–630. doi:10.1177/0022219416662033

13.

Mazzocco

M. M.

Devlin

K. T.

(2008). Parts and “holes”: Gaps in rational number sense among children with vs. without MD. Developmental Science, 11, 681–691.

14.

Mazzocco

M. M.

Myers

G. F.

Lewis

K. E.

Hanich

L. B.

Murphy

M. M.

(2013). Limited knowledge of fraction representations differentiated middle school students with mathematics learning disability vs. low mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 371–387. doi:10.1016/j/jecp.2013.01.005

15.

Mix

K. S.

Levine

S. C.

Cheng

Y. L.

Young

Hambrick

D. Z.

Ping

Konstantopoulos

(2016). Separate but correlated: The latent structure of space and mathematics across development. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 145, 1206–1227.

16.

Montague

(1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164–177.

17.

National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2016). NAEP data explorer. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/

18.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). NAEP data explorer.

19.

National Council for Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

20.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics: Common core state standards initiative. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/

21.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: Final report of the national mathematics advisory panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

22.

Okamoto

Case

(1996). Exploring the microstructure of children’s central conceptual structures in the domain of number. Monographs of the Society for research in Child Development, 61, 27–58.

23.

Resnick

Jordan

N. C.

Hansen

Rajan

Rodrigues

Siegler

R. S.

Fuchs

L. S.

(2016). Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 52, 746–757.

24.

Siegler

Carpenter

Fennell

Geary

Lewis

Okamoto

Wray

(2010). Developing effective fractions instruction for kindergarten through 8th grade (IES Practice Guide, NCEE 2010-4039). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/fractions_pg_093010.pdf

25.

Siegler

R. S.

Lortie-Forgues

(2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 144–150. doi:10.1111/cdep.12077

26.

Siegler

R. S.

Pyke

A. A.

(2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1994–2004.

27.

Siegler

R. S.

Thompson

C. A.

Schneider

(2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296.

28.

Swanson

Schwartz

Ginsburg

Kossan

(1981). The clinical interview: Validity, reliability and diagnosis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 31–38.

29.

Valles

J. R.

(2014). Using multiple representations. Mathitudes, 1, 1–14.

30.

van Garderen

Montague

. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving, and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 246–254. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00079

31.

van Garderen

Scheuermann

Jackson

. (2012). Examining how students with diverse abilities use diagrams to solve mathematics word problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 145–160. doi:10.1177/0731948712438558

32.

(2014). Teaching fractions according to the common core standards. Retrieved from http://math.berkeley.edu/~wu/CCSS-Fractions.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.80 MB