Research evaluating the variables that influence learning has devoted inadequate attention to the influence of the amount of new material presented at one time. The current study evaluated the impact of varying instructional set size (ISS) on the rate at which elementary school students mastered multiplication facts while receiving constant time delay (CTD) instruction. Instructional time was equated across conditions. Instruction was provided for an ISS of five and 20 using CTD instruction for multiplication facts. ISS 20 was more efficient for two out of the three participants. This suggests a much larger efficient ISS than previous research. The implications of this finding for the importance of the instructional method in attempting to identify an efficient ISS, as well as the study’s connection to prior research, in this area are discussed.
BradenJ. P.ShawS. R. (2009). Intervention validity of cognitive assessment: Knowns, unknowables, and unknowns. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 106–115. doi:10.1177/1534508407313013
2.
BramlettR.CatesG. L.SavinaE.LauingerB. (2010). Assessing effectiveness and efficiency of academic interventions in school psychology journals: 1995-2005. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 114–125.
3.
BurnsM. K. (2001). Measuring sight-word acquisition and retention rates with curriculum-based assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 148–157. doi:10.1177/073428290101900204
4.
BurnsM. K.HelmanL. A. (2009). Relationship between language skills and acquisition rate of sight words among English language learners. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 221–232. doi:10.1080/19388070802291547
5.
BurnsM. K.Sterling-TurnerH. E. (2010). Comparison of efficiency measures for academic interventions based on acquisition and maintenance. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 126–134. doi:10.1002/pits.20458
6.
BurnsM. K.ZaslofskyA. F.MakiK. E.KwongE. (2015). Effect of modifying intervention set size with acquisition rate data while practicing single-digit multiplication facts. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 41, 131–140. doi:10.1177/1534508415593529
7.
CapaR. L.AudiffrenM.RagotS. (2008). The effects of achievement motivation, task difficulty, and goal difficulty on physiological, behavioral, and subjective effort. Psychophysiology, 45, 859–868.
8.
CarrollJ. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
9.
CatesG. L.SkinnerC. H.WatsonT. S.MeadowsT. J.WeaverA.JacksonB. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 32, 601–616.
10.
ChengT.LuY.YangC. (2015). Using the multi-display teaching system to lower cognitive load. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18, 128–140.
11.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.FishmanB.GiulianiS.LuckM.UnderwoodP. S.. . . SchatschneiderC. (2011). Testing the impact of child characteristics × instruction interactions on third graders’ reading comprehension by differentiating literacy instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 189–221. doi:10.1598/RRQ.46.3.1
12.
CookeN. L.GuzaukasR.PressleyJ. S.KerrK. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213–234.
13.
CookeN. L.ReichardS. M. (1996). The effects of different interpersal drill ratios on acquisition and generalization of multiplication and division facts. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 124–142.
14.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
15.
CrossleyM. J.MaddoxW. T.AshbyF. G. (2018). Increased cognitive load enables unlearning in procedural category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 1845–1853. doi:10.1037/xlm0000554
16.
DalyE.WittJ. C.MartensB. K.DoolE. J. (1997). A model for conducting a functional analysis of academic performance problems. School Psychology Review, 26, 554–574.
17.
D’IncauB. J. (2015). Introduction to the special issue on school psychology and the Common Core State Standards. Contemporary School Psychology, 19, 63–65. doi:10.1007/s40688-015-0052-z
18.
ForbesB. E.SkinnerC. H.BlackM. P.YawJ.BooherJ.DelisleJ. (2013). Learning rates and known-to-unknown flash-card ratios: Comparing effectiveness while holding instructional time constant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 832–837. doi:10.1002/jaba.74
19.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2009). On the importance of a unified model of responsiveness to intervention. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 41–43. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00074.x
20.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
21.
GastD. L.WoleryM.MorrisL. L.DoyleP. M.MeyerS. (1990). Teaching sight word reading in a group instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Exceptionality, 1, 81–96. doi:10.1080/09362839009524745
22.
HaegeleK.BurnsM. K. (2015). Effect of modifying intervention set size with acquisition rate data among students identified with a learning disability. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 33–50. doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9201-0
23.
HaringN. G.LovittT. C.EatonM. D.HansenC. L. (1978). The fourth R: Research in the classroom. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
24.
JosephL. M.NistL. M. (2006). Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 69–79. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9008-8
25.
KelleyB.HospJ. L.HowellK. W. (2008). Curriculum-bases evaluation and math: An overview. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 250–256. doi:10.1177/1534508407313490
26.
KirschnerP. A.AyresP.ChandlerP. (2011). Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 99–105. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.025
27.
KisamoreA. N.KarstenA. M.MannC. C. (2016). Teaching multiply controlled intraverbals to children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49, 826–847. doi:10.1002/jaba.344
28.
KnightM. G.RossD. E.TaylorR. L.RamasamyR. (2003). Constant time delay and interspersal of known items to teach sight words to students with mental retardation and learning disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 179–191.
29.
KupzykS.DalyE. J.AndersonM. N. (2011). A comparison of two flash-card methods for improving sight-word reading. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 781–792. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-781
30.
MaceF. C.HockM. L.LalliJ. S.WestB. J.BelfioreW. P.PinterE.BrownK. D. (1988). Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 123–141. doi:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-123
31.
MacNamaraB. N.FrankD. J. (2018). How do task characteristics affect learning and performance? The roles of variably mapped and dynamic tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 764–778. doi:10.1037/xlm0000487
32.
MattinglyJ. C.BottD. A. (1990). Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning problems. Exceptional Children, 56, 438–449.
33.
MazurJ. E. (2002). Learning and behavior (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
34.
NistL.JosephL. M. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency in flashcard drill instructional methods on urban first-graders’ word recognition, acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. School Psychology Review, 37, 294–308.
35.
NoellG. H.FreelandJ. T.WittJ. C.GansleK. A. (2001). Using brief assessments to identify effective interventions for individual students. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 335–355. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00072-3
36.
PhanH. P.NguB. H.YeungA. S. (2017). Achieving optimal best: Instructional efficiency and the use of cognitive load theory in mathematical problem solving. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 667–692. doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9373-3
37.
PhillipsE. R.KaneR. B. (1973). Validating learning hierarchies for sequencing mathematical tasks in elementary school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 141–151. doi:10.2307/748508
38.
RosenshineB. (2009). The empirical support for direct instruction. In TobiasS.DuffyT. M.TobiasS.DuffyT. M. (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 201–220). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
ShaughnessyJ. J. (1973). Verbal discrimination learning and two-category classification learning as a function of list length and pronunciation instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 202–209. doi:10.1037/h0035477
40.
SkinnerC. H. (2010). Applied comparative effectiveness researchers must measure learning rates: A commentary on efficiency articles. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 166–172. doi:10.1002/pits.20461
41.
SzadokierskiI.BurnsM. K. (2008). Analogue evaluation of the effects of opportunities to respond and ratios of known items within drill rehearsal of Esperanto words. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 593–609.
42.
UttlB. (2005). Measurement of individual differences: Lessons from memory assessment research and clinical practice. Psychological Science, 16, 460–467. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01557.x
43.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.LyonG. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ–achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223–238. doi:10.1177/002221940003300302
44.
VolpeR. J.MuleC. M.BrieschA. M.JosephL. M.BurnsM. K. (2011). A comparison of two flashcard drill methods targeting word recognition. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 117–137.
45.
WoleryM.HolcombeA.CybriwskyC.DoyleP. M.SchusterJ. W.AultM. J.GastD. L. (1992). Constant time delay with discrete responses: A review of effectiveness and demographic, procedural, and methodological parameters. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 13, 239–266. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(92)90028-5
