The Perceptions of RtI Skills Survey is a self-report measure that assesses educators’ perceptions of their data-based problem-solving skills—a critical element of many Response-to-Intervention (RtI) models. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to evaluate the underlying factor structure of this tool. Educators from 68 (n = 2,397) and 60 (n = 1,961) schools in a southeastern state participated during the spring of 2008 and spring of 2010, respectively. Results supported a correlated three-factor model with the following dimensions: Perceptions of RtI Skills Applied to Academic Content, Perceptions of RtI Skills Applied to Behavior Content, and Perceptions of Data Display Skills. Internal consistency estimates for all factors exceeded .90. In addition, significant associations between factor scores and data-based problem-solving fidelity at Tiers I and II were found. Implications for educators facilitating RtI implementation are discussed.
BandalosD. L.FinneyS. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 93–114). New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BaruchY.HoltomB. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139–1160. doi:10.1177/0018726708094863
3.
BatscheG. M.ElliotJ.GradenJ. L.GrimesJ.KovaleskiJ. F.PrasseD.. . . TillyW. D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
4.
BentlerP. M.ChouC. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Social Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.
5.
BerganJ. R. (1970). A systems approach to psychological services. Psychology in the Schools, 8, 315–319.
6.
BerganJ. R.KratochwillT. R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York, NY: Plenum.
7.
BerganJ. R.TombariM. L. (1976). Consultant skill and efficiency and the implementation and outcomes of consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 3–14.
8.
BerkeleyS.BenderW. N.PeasterL. G.SaundersL. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95. doi:10.1177/0022219408326214
9.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
Brown-ChidseyR.SteegeM. W. (2010). Response to intervention: Principles and strategies for effective practice (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
BurnsM. K.GibbonsK. (2012). Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to ensure scientific-based practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
CaffarellaR. S. (1994). Planning programs for adult learners: A practical guide for educators, trainers, and staff developers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CastilloJ. M.BatscheG. M.CurtisM. J.StockslagerK.MarchA.MinchD. (2010). Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project: Evaluation tool technical assistance manual. Tampa, FL: Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project, University of South Florida.
15.
CastilloJ. M.BatscheG. M.CurtisM. J.StockslagerK.MarchA.MinchD.HinesC. (2012). Problem Solving/Response to Intervention evaluation tool technical assistance manual–revised. Tample, FL: Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project, University of South Florida.
16.
CastilloJ. M.HinesC. M.BatscheG. M.CurtisM. J. (2011). The Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project: Year 3 evaluation report. Florida Problem Solving/Response to Intervention Project, University of South Florida.
17.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
19.
DanielsonL.DoolittleJ.BradleyR. (2007). Professional development, capacity building, and research needs: Critical issues for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 632–637.
20.
DedrickR. F.GreenbaumP. E. (2011). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interagency collaboration of children’s mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 27–40. doi:10.1177/1063426610365879
21.
DentonC. A. (2012). Response to Intervention for reading difficulties in the primary grades: Some answers and lingering questions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 232–243. doi:10.1177/0022219412442155
22.
DesimoneL. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38, 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
23.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
24.
FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2009). Response to Intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
FlugumK. R.ReschlyD. J. (1994). Prereferral interventions: Quality indices and outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 1–14. doi:10.1016/0022-4405(94)90025-6
27.
FreemanR.LohrmannS.IrvinL. K.KincaidD.VosslerV.FerroJ. (2009). Systems change and the complementary roles of in-service and preservice training in schoolwide positive behavior support. In SailorW.DunlapG.SugaiG.HornerR. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior supports (pp. 603–629). New York, NY: Springer.
28.
FullanM. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
29.
GloverT. A.DiPernaJ. C. (2007). Service delivery for Response to Intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36, 526–540.
30.
GreenwoodC. R.Min KimJ. (2012). Response to Intervention (RTI) services: An ecobehavioral perspective. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 22, 79–105. doi:10.1080/10474412.2011.649648
31.
GreshamF. M. (2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326–343.
32.
GuskeyT. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51.
33.
GutkinT. B.CurtisM. J. (2009). School-based consultation: The science and practice of indirect service delivery. In GutkinT. B.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed., pp. 591–635). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
34.
HallG. E.HordS. M. (2015). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
35.
HaslamM. B. (2010, January). Teacher professional development evaluation guide. Oxford, OH: National Skill Development Corporation.
36.
HauerwasL. B.BrownR.ScottA. N. (2013). Specific learning disability and response to intervention: State-level guidance. Exceptional Children, 80, 101–120. doi:10.1177/001440291308000105
37.
HeathB.LakshmananA.PerlmutterA.DavisL. (2010). Measuring the impact of professional development on science teaching: A review of survey, observation, and interview protocols. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33, 3–20. doi:10.1080/17437270902947304
38.
HollenbeckA. F. (2007). From IDEA to implementation: A discussion of foundational and future responsiveness-to-intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 137–146. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00238.x
39.
HordS. M.RoussinJ. L. (2013). Implementing change through learning: Concerns-based concepts, tools, and strategies guiding change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
40.
HoxJ. J.de LeeuwE. D. (1994). A comparison of nonresponse in mail, telephone, and face to face surveys: Applying multilevel modeling to meta-analysis. Quality & Quantity, 28, 329–344.
41.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structure Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
KratochwillT. R.VolpianskyP.ClementsM.BallC. (2007). Professional development in implementing and sustaining multitier prevention models: Implications for response to intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 618–631.
45.
Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
46.
LodicoM. G.SpauldingD. T.VoegtleK. H. (2010). Methods in educational research: From theory to practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
47.
LukeD. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
48.
MayerD. P. (1999). Measuring instructional practice: Can policymakers trust survey data?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 29–45. doi:10.3102/01623737021001029
49.
MerriamS. B.SimpsonE. L. (2000). A guide to research for educators and trainers of adults (2nd ed.). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
50.
MuijsD. (2006). Measuring teacher effectiveness: Some methodological reflections. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 53–74. doi:10.1080/13803610500392236
51.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
52.
NoellG. H.GansleK. A. (2006). Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Instruction, 32, 32–39. doi:10.1177/15345084060320010501
53.
NoellG. H.WittJ. C.SliderN. J.ConnellJ. E.GattiS. L.WilliamsK. L.. . . DuhonG. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87–106.
54.
O’ConnorE. P.FreemanE. W. (2012). District-level considerations in supporting and sustaining RtI implementation. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 297–310. doi:10.1002/pits.21598
PluymertK. (2014). Problem-solving foundations for school psychological services. In HarrisonP. L.ThomasA. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 25–40). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
57.
Riley-TillmanT. C.BurnsM. K.GibbonsK. (2012). RTI applications, Vol. 2: Assessment, analysis, and decision-making. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58.
RoachA. T.LawtonK.ElliottS. N. (2014). Best practices in facilitating and evaluating the integrity of school-based interventions. In HarrisonP. L.ThomasA. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 133–146). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
59.
RossJ. A.McDougallD.Hogaboam-GrayA.LeSageA. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers’ implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 344–363. doi:10.2307/30034787
60.
SailorW.DunlapG.SugaiG.HornerR. (2009). Handbook of positive behavior support. New York, NY: Springer.
61.
SanettiL. M.KratochwillT. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445–459.
62.
SansostiF. J.NoltemeyerA.GossS. (2010). Principals’ perceptions of the importance and availability of Response to Intervention practices within high school settings. School Psychology Review, 39, 286–295.
63.
SchwartzG. T. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
64.
SnyderP.WolfeB. (2008). The big three process components of effective professional development: Needs assessment, evaluation, and follow-up. In WintonP. J.McCollumJ. A.CatlettC. (Eds.), Practical approaches to early childhood professional development: Evidence, strategies, and resources (pp. 13–51). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
65.
Spear-SwerlingL.CheesmanE. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge-base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1691–1723. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9338-3
66.
Spectrum K12 School Solutions. (2011). Response to intervention adoption survey 2011. Bellevue, WA: Global Scholar.
67.
StoiberK. C. (2014). A comprehensive framework for multitiered systems of support in school psychology. In HarrisonP. L.ThomasA. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology: Data-based and collaborative decision making (pp. 41–70). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
68.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Responsiveness-to-Intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237. doi:10.1080/09362830903235375
69.
TelzrowC. F.McNamaraK.HollingerC. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443–461.
70.
VujnovicR. K.FabianoG. A.MorrisK. L.NormanK.HallmarkC.HartleyC. (2014). Examining school psychologists’ and teachers’ application of approaches within a Response to Intervention framework. Exceptionality, 22, 129–140. doi:10.1080/09362835.2013.865530
71.
YsseldykeJ. E.ChristensenS. L. (1987). Evaluating students’ instructional environments. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 17–24. doi:10.1177/074193258700800305
72.
YsseldykeJ. E.McLeodS. (2007). Using technology tools to monitor response to intervention. In JimersonS.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 396–407). New York, NY: Springer.
73.
ZirkelP. A.ThomasA. B. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 56–63. doi:10.1177/004005991004200306
