Assessing response to intervention (RTI) is a complex process that requires selecting interventions, identifying a reasonable strength of intervention, implementing the intervention, assessing progress, and applying decision rules to the resulting data. Appropriate standards and practices are critically important for all of these activities. However, the implementation of interventions has received scant attention in the RTI literature to date despite emerging empirical evidence that assuring intervention implementation may be one of the most challenging aspects of implementing RTI. This article discusses the critical role of plan implementation within RTI. Documentation that interventions were implemented is both a substantive necessity for implementing an entitlement process in which services are integrated with assessment (RTI) and a due process protection for students. The current data regarding the assessment and improvement of intervention plan implementation is also briefly reviewed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnett, D.W., Daly, E.J., Jones, K.M., & Lentz, F.E. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity . The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66—79.
2.
Bergan, J.R., & Kratochwill, T.R. (1990). Behavioral consultation and therapy. New York: Plenum Press .
3.
Daly, E.J., III, Lentz, F.E., Jr., & Boyer, J. (1996). The instructional hierarchy: A conceptual model for understanding the effective components of reading interventions. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 369—386.
4.
Dawes, R.M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. The American Psychologist, 34, 571—582.
5.
DiGennaro, F.D., Martens, B.K., & McIntyre, L.L. (2005). Increasing treatment integrity through negative reinforcement: Effects on teacher and student behavior. School Psychology Review, 34, 220— 231.
6.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Morris, R.D., & Lyon, G.R. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and AdolescentPsychology, 34, 506—522.
7.
Foster, S.L., & Cone, J.D. (1986). Design and use of direct observation procedures . In A. R. Ciminero, K. S. Calhoun, & H. E. Adams (Eds.), Handbook of behavioral assessment (2nd ed.; pp.253—324). New York: Wiley.
8.
Fuchs, D., Deshler, D.D., & Reschly, D.J. (2004). National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Multimethod studies of identification and classification issues. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 189— 195.
9.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429—438.
10.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1989b). Effects of instrumental use of curriculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43—52.
11.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Allinder, R.M. (1989). The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique , 14, 203—221.
12.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617—641.
13.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Speece, D.L. (2002). Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly , 25, 33—45.
14.
Gansle, K.A., & McMahon, C.M. (1997). Component integrity of teacher intervention management behavior using a student self-monitoring treatment: An experimental analysis. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 7, 405—419.
15.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In C. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 347—360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
16.
Graner, P.S., Faggetta-Luby, M.N., & Fritschmann, N.S. (2005). An overview of responsiveness to intervention: What practitioners ought to know. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 93—105.
17.
Greenwood, C.R., Terry, B., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Finney, R. (1992). The classwide peer tutoring program: Implementation factors moderating students' achievement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 101—116.
18.
Gresham, F.M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37—50.
19.
Gresham, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson , & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467—519). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Gresham, F.M., & Witt, J.C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 249—267.
21.
Henggeler, S.W., Melton, G.B., Brondino, M.J., Scherer, D.G., & Hanley, J.H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 65, 821—833.
22.
Heward, W.L. (2006). Exceptional children: An introduction to special education (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
23.
Hintze, J.M., & Matthews, W.J. (2004). The generalizability of systematic direct observations across time and setting: A preliminary investigation of the psychometrics of behavioral observation. School Psychology Review, 33, 258—270.
24.
Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Snyder, E. (1994). Effects of two levels of procedural fidelity with constant time delay on children's learning. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 4, 49—73.
25.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
26.
Jacob-Timm, S., & Hartshorne, T.S. (2003). Ethics and law for school psychologists (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
27.
Jones, K.M., Wickstrom, K.F., & Friman, P.C. (1997). The effects of observational feedback on treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 316—326.
28.
Kavale, K.A., Holdnack, J.A., & Mostert, M.P. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of Specific Learning Disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 2—16.
29.
Kazdin, A.E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., & Bocian, K.M. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and what schools use: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314—326.
31.
MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., Bocian, K.M., & Siperstein, G.N. (1997). The role of assessment in qualifying students as eligible for special education: What is and what's supposed to be. Focus onExceptional Children, 30, 1—20.
32.
Martens, B.K., Hiralall, A.S., & Bradley, T.A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly , 12, 33—41.
33.
McEvoy, M.A., Shores, R.E., Wehby, J.H., Johnson, S.M., & Fox, J.J. (1990). Special education teachers' implementation of procedures to promote social interaction among children in integrated settings . Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 25, 267—276.
34.
Mellard, D.F., Byrd, S.E., Johnson, E., Tollefson, J.M., & Boesche, L. (2004). Foundations and research on identifying model responsiveness-to-intervention sites. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 243—256.
35.
Mortenson, B.P., & Witt, J.C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a prereferral academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 27, 613—627.
36.
Noell, G.H. (in press). Research examining the relationships among consultation process, treatment integrity, and outcomes. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation: Empirical foundations for the field. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
37.
Noell, G.H., Duhon, G.J., Gatti, S.L., & Connell, J.E. (2002). Consultation, follow-up, and behavior management intervention implementation in general education. School Psychology Review, 31, 217—234.
38.
Noell, G.H., & Gresham, F.M. (1993). Functional outcome analysis: Do the benefits of consultation and prereferral intervention justify the costs?School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 200—226.
39.
Noell, G.H., Gresham, F.M., & Gansle, K.A. (2002). Does treatment integrity matter? A preliminary investigation of instructional implementation and mathematics performance. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 11, 51—67.
40.
Noell, G.H., Witt, J.C., Gilbertson, D.N., Ranier, D.D., & Freeland, J.T. (1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 77—88.
41.
Noell, G.H., Witt, J.C., LaFleur, L.H., Mortenson, B.P., Ranier, D.D., & LeVelle, J. (2000). A comparison of two follow-up strategies to increase teacher intervention implementation in general education following consultation . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 271—284.
42.
Noell, G.H., Witt, J.C., Slider, N.J., Connell, J.E., Gatti, S.L., Williams, K.L., et al. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87—106.
43.
Sterling-Turner, H.E., Watson, T.S., Wildmon, M., Watkins, C., & Little, E. (2001). Investigating the relationship between training type and treatment integrity. School Psychology Quarterly , 16, 56—67.
44.
Taylor, J., & Miller, M. (1997). When timeout works some of the time: The importance of treatment integrity and functional assessment. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 4—22.
45.
Telzrow, C.F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C.L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443—461.
46.
Vermilyea, B.B., Barlow, D.H., & O'Brien, G.T. (1984). The importance of assessing treatment integrity: An example in the anxiety disorders. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 6, 1—11.
47.
Vollmer, T.R., Roane, H.S., Ringdahl, J.E., & Marcus, B.A. (1999). Evaluating treatment challenges with differential reinforcement of alternative behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 9—23.
48.
Watson, T.S., & Robinson, S.L. (1996). Direct behavioral consultation: An alternative to traditional behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 267—278.
49.
Wickstrom, K.F., Jones, K.M., LaFleur, L.H., & Witt, J.C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioural consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141—154.
50.
Witt, J.C., Noell, G.H., LaFleur, L.H., & Mortenson, B.P. (1997). Teacher usage of interventions in general education: Measurement and analysis of the independent variable . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 693—696.
51.
Yeaton, W.H., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 156—167.
